Orthogonal experimental design applied for wear characterization of aluminum/Csf metal composite fabricated by the thixomixing method
Source abstract
Abstract
High silicon content aluminum alloy (hypereutectic) possess good tribological characteristics with low coefficients of friction, when embedded with short carbon fiber (Csf), making this composite a good material choice where good wear and high strength properties are required in light weight components. There is no previously published information available, to the knowledge of the authors, regarding the influence of wear parameters and their interactions on the tribological behavior of Csf reinforced metal matrix composites. In this study a Taguchi design of experiment (DoE) was conducted to optimize and analyze the effects of the wear parameters on the tribological properties of Al/Csf metal matrix composite. A novel thixomixing method which was used to process the metal within the semisolid state was employed to embed short carbon fibers homogenously into the metal matrix. The influences of the sliding speed, applied load and volume fraction, of Csf on the specific wear rate and coefficient of friction were examined, with each of these input parameters tested at three levels(0, 4.2, 8.1%vol.). The results were indicated that Al/Csf composite had better tribological properties than Al alloy due to which contains carbon as solid lubricant. According to the statistical analysis, the influence of volume fraction of carbon fiber on wear parameters was ranked first; so the load and sliding speed are at the following rankings. The contribution percentage for each parameter was determined by the analysis of variance. The relatively good interfacial adherence of carbon fiber and matrix alloy were demonstrated. The coherent and adherent graphite-rich layer on the worn surface was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Ravindran P, Manisekar K, Narayanasamy P, Selvakumar N, Narayanasamy R (2012) Mater & Des 39:4210.1016/j.matdes.2012.02.013 ↗
2. L. Liu, W. Li, Y. Tang, B. Shen, W Hu, 266, 733 (2009)10.1016/j.wear.2008.08.009 ↗
3. Ramesh CS, Adarsha H, Pramod S, Khan Z (2013) Mater Des 50:59710.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.031 ↗
4. Suresha S, Sridhara BK (2010) Composites Sci and Technol 70:165210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.013 ↗
5. P. Baumli, J. Sychev, I. Budai, J.T. Szabo, G Kaptay, 44, 47 (2013)10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.021 ↗
6. W. Yu, J Yao, 101, 3175 (2006)10.1002/app.23399 ↗
7. Even C, Arvieu C, Coutand B, Quenisset JM (2010) J of composite mater
8. Bhav Singh B, Balasubramanian M (2009) J of Mater Process Technol 209:210410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.002 ↗
9. Shalu T, Abhilash E, Joseph MA (2009) J of Mater Process Technol 209:480910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.12.012 ↗
10. Chawla N, Chawla KK (2006) JOM 58:6710.1007/s11837-006-0231-5 ↗
11. Deng X, Chawla N (2006) J Mater Sci 41:573110.1007/s10853-006-0100-1 ↗
12. Das P, Samanta SK, Chattopadhyay H, Dutta P, Barman N (2013) In: Rheological characterization of semi-solid A356 aluminium alloy, vol 192-193. Cape Town10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.192-193.329 ↗
13. Akbarzadeh E, Shakib SE (2011) Int J Min Met Mater 18:73110.1007/s12613-011-0504-z ↗
14. Kumar R, Dhiman S (2013) Mater & Des 50:35110.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.038 ↗
15. Seong HG, Lopez HF, Robertson DP, Rohatgi PK (2008) 487, 201
16. Huang X (2009) 2, 2369
17. Burkanudeen A, Krishnan GS, Murali N (2013) J Therm Anal Calorim 112:126110.1007/s10973-012-2706-7 ↗
18. P. Ravindran, K. Manisekar, R. Narayanasamy, P Narayanasamy, 39, 1169 (2013)10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.07.041 ↗
19. Ramesh CS, Prasad TB (2008) J of Tribology 131:01450110.1115/1.2991124 ↗
20. Davis JR (2001) Surface engineering for corrosion and wear resistance. ASM International, Materials Park, OH10.31399/asm.tb.secwr.9781627083157 ↗
21. A. Ureña, J. Rams, M. Campo, M Sánchez, 266, 1128 (2009)10.1016/j.wear.2009.03.016 ↗
22. Chen H, Alpas AT (1996) 192, 186
23. Wilson S, Alpas AT (1997) 212, 41
24. T.Z. Wei, S.R.B. Shamsuri, C.S. Yee, M.W.A. Rashid, Q Ahsan, 68, 703 (2013)10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.242 ↗
25. Koráb J, Štefánik P, Kavecký Š, Šebo P, Korb G (2002) Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 33:57710.1016/S1359-835X(02)00003-9 ↗
26. Mahato A, Xia S, Perry T, Sachdev A, Biswas SK (2010) Tribol Int 43:38110.1016/j.triboint.2009.06.020 ↗
27. Saklakoglu N, Irizalp SG, Ercayhan Y, Birol Y (2014) Ind Lubr Tribol 66:4610.1108/ILT-09-2011-0067 ↗
28. Mbuyaa TO, Oderaa BO, Ng’ang’a SP (2003) Int J CastMetals Res 15:451
29. Abouei V, Saghafian H, Shabestari SG, Zarghami M (2010) Mater Des 31:351810.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.015 ↗
30. Abouei V, Shabestari SG, Saghafian H (2010) Mater Charact 61:108910.1016/j.matchar.2010.07.001 ↗
31. Ye H (2003) J Mater Eng Perform 12:28810.1361/105994903770343132 ↗