journal article·2009-08

Tuning of biodegradation rate of PLLA scaffolds via blending with PLA

F. Carfì Pavia, V. La Carrubba, V. Brucato

Publisher page

Abstract

Blends of Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA) with Poly-Lactic Acid (PLA) in different proportions (95/5, 90/10, 80/20, 70/30 and 60/40) were utilized in order to realize biodegradable and biocompatible scaffolds for soft tissue engineering applications. The scaffolds were produced via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) starting from ternary systems where dioxane was the solvent and water the non-solvent. Morphology was evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (average pore size and interconnection). Foams’ apparent density was also evaluated (porosity ranges from 87% to 92%). Moreover an in vitro biodegradation test of scaffolds was set-up in order to verify the rate of degradation of the various PLLA/PLA blends employed. The rate of degradation was calculated via WAXD, by analyzing the increment of cristallinity of the various PLLA/PLA scaffolds mantained for different times in a body mimicking fluid, in the presence or in the absence of cells. The results showed that it is possible to prepare scaffolds of PLLA/PLA via TIPS and to tune their average pore size by changing some experimental parameters (polymer concentration, solvent/non-solvent ratio, demixing temperature and time). The biodegradation tests highlighted some significant differences in terms of degradation rate between the PLLA/PLA foams and pure PLLA foam (used as control). The data confirm that morphology, mechanical properties and biodegrability of the foam using a blend of the scaffolds can be tuned by blending PLLA with PLA.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (8)

Show source-provided references
1. Langer R (1997) Tissue engineering: a new field and its challenge. Pharmaceutical Research 14:840–84110.1023/A:1012131329148 ↗
2. Marler JJ, Upton J, Laner R, Vacanti JP (1998) Transplantation of cells in matrices for tissue regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 33:165–18210.1016/S0169-409X(98)00025-8 ↗
3. Cheung HY, Lau KT, Lu TP, Hui D (2007) A critical review on polymer-based bio-engineered materials for scaffold development. Composites B 38:291–30010.1016/j.compositesb.2006.06.014 ↗
4. Tsuji H, Ikada Y (1996) Blends of isotactic and atactic poly(lactide)s .2. Molecular-weight effects of atactic component on crystallization and morphology of equimolar blends from the melt. Polymer 37:595–60210.1016/0032-3861(96)83146-6 ↗
5. Tsuji H, Ikada Y (1997) Blends of crystalline and amorphous poly(lactide) .3. Hydrolysis of solution- cast blend films. J Appl Pol Sci 63:855–86310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970214)63:7<855::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
6. Tsuji H, Ikarashi K (2004) In vitro hydrolysis of poly(l- lactide) crystalline residues as extended-chain crystallites. Part I: long-term hydrolysis in phosphate-buffered solution at 37°C. Biomaterials 25:5449–545510.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.12.053 ↗
7. Hua FJ, Kim GE, Lee JD, Son YK, Lee DS (2002) Macroporous poly(L-lactide) scaffold 1. Preparation of a macroporous scaffold by liquid-liquid phase separation of a PLLA-dioxane-water system. J Biomed Mat Res 63:161–16710.1002/jbm.10121 ↗
8. Carfì Pavia F, La Carruba V, Piccarolo S, Brucato V (2008) Polymeric scaffolds prepared via thermally induced phase separation: tuning of structure and morphology. J Biomed Mat Res Part A 86:459–46610.1002/jbm.a.31621 ↗