journal article·2009-12

Investigation of effective parameters on surface roughness in thermomechanical tube spinning process

A. R. Fazeli, Majid Ghoreishi

Publisher page

Abstract

Tube spinning process is recognized as an effective process for fabricating of thin wall cylindrical parts, with precision tolerances, high surface quality and desired mechanical property. In this research, the influences of major parameters of thermomechanical tube spinning process such as preform thickness, percentage of thickness reduction, mandrel rotational speed, feed rate of rollers, solution treatment time and aging treatment time on surface roughness for fabricating of 2024 aluminum spun tubes using design of experiments are studied. Experimental data are analyzed by analysis of variance (Anova) and empirical models of surface roughnesses are developed. It is found that deeper percentage of thickness reduction with thicker preform thickness, slower feed rate of rollers and mandrel rotational speed and higher solution treatment time and aging treatment time are advantageous for obtaining smoother surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Textile materials and evaluations · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Hua FA, Yang YS, Zhang YN (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of tube spinning. J Mater Process Tech 168:68–7410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.014 ↗
2. Stewart JD (1988) ASM Hand book, 9th ed. Vol. 14, ASM international, p 675
3. Kobayashi S, Thomson EG (1962) Theory of spin forging. CIRP Annals 10:114–123
4. Hayama M, Kudo H (1979) Analysis of diametral growth and working forces in tube spinning, Bull. JSME 22:776–78410.1299/jsme1958.22.776 ↗
5. Gur M, Tirosh J (1982) Plastic flow instability under compressive loading during shear spinning process. J Eng Ind, Trans ASME 104:17–2210.1115/1.3185791 ↗
6. Hasimoto H, Kita S, Shibasaka T, Yoshida S (1980) On the deformation in tube spinning, Report NO. 33A, Himegi Industrial University, Japan
7. Park J-W, Kim Y-H (1997) Analysis of tube-spinning process by the upper-bound stream-function method. J Mater Process Tech 66:195–20310.1016/S0924-0136(96)02519-8 ↗
8. Rajan KM, Narasimhan K (2002) Effect of heat treatment of preform on the mechanical properties of flow formed AISI 4130 Steel Tubes—a theoretical and experimental assessment. J Mater Process Tech 125–126:503–51110.1016/S0924-0136(02)00305-9 ↗
9. Jahazi M, Ebrahimi G (2000) The influence of flow-forming parameters and microstructure on the quality of a D6ac steel. J Mater Process Tech 103:362–36610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00508-2 ↗
10. Xu Y, Zhang SH (2001) 3D rigid -plastic FEM numerical on tube spinning. J Mater Process Tech 113:710–71310.1016/S0924-0136(01)00644-6 ↗
11. Chang SC, Wang CC (2001) Fabrication of 2024 aluminum spun tube using a thermomechanical treatment process. J Mater Process Tech 108:294–29910.1016/S0924-0136(00)00840-2 ↗
12. Davis JR (1994) ASM Hand book, 2th ed. Vol. 4, ASM international, p 841
13. Chang SC, Huang CA (1998) Tube spinnability of AA 2024 and 7075 aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Tech 80–81:676–68210.1016/S0924-0136(98)00174-5 ↗
14. Ma ZE (1993) Optimal angle of attack in tube spinning. J Mater Process Tech 37:217–22410.1016/0924-0136(93)90092-K ↗
15. Montgomery DC (2005) Design of experiments & statistical analysis, 6th edn. McGraw Hill, NewYork