Influence of lubrication method and counter punch on hydroforming in curved diagonal tee tube
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Polymer Science and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Lee MG, Korkolis YP, Kim JH (2015) Recent developments in hydroforming technology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 229(4):572–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541454846310.1177/0954405414548463 ↗
2. Yuan SJ, He ZB, Liu G et al (2011) New developments in theory and processes of internal high pressure forming. Chin J Nonferrous Met 21(10):2523–2533. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19476/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2011.10.020
3. Han C, Yuan SJ (2017) Recent advances in high pressure forming technology and equipment for automotive lightweight structural components. Auto Manuf Eng 4:24–26
4. Peng JY, Luo DG, Teng BG et al (2017) Analysis on wrinkling and cracking initiation in hydroforming thin-walled Y-shaped tubes. Materials Science and Technology 25(4):11–16. https://doi.org/10.11951/j.issn.1005-0299.2017006110.11951/j.issn.1005-0299.20170061 ↗
5. Yuan S, Yuan W, Wang X (2006) Effect of wrinkling behavior on formability and thickness distribution in tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 177(1):668–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.10110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.101 ↗
6. Alaswad A, Benyounis KY, Olabi G (2011) Employment of finite element analysis and response surface methodology to investigate the geometrical factors in T-type bi-layered tube hydroforming. Adv Eng Softw 42(11):917–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.07.00210.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.07.002 ↗
7. Yuan CC, Xu XF, Fan YB et al (2020) Numerical and experimental studies on thin-walled aluminum alloy tube hydroforming using differential lubrication method. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 126(5):319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03509-210.1007/s00339-020-03509-2 ↗
8. Pourhamid R, Shirazi A (2021) A comprehensive damage criterion in tube hydroforming. Proc INSTITUTION Mech Eng PART B-JOURNAL Eng Manuf 235(3):417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440542096296810.1177/0954405420962968 ↗
9. Abdelkefi A, Guermazi N, Boudeau N et al (2016) Effect of the lubrication between the tube and the die on the corner filling when hydroforming of different cross-sectional shapes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1):1169–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8552-110.1007/s00170-016-8552-1 ↗
10. Kaya S (2015) Evaluating porthole and seamless aluminum tubes and lubricants for hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(5):807–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6493-010.1007/s00170-014-6493-0 ↗
11. Guo XZ, Liu HB, Cui SQ et al (2014) Investigation on the maximum thinning and protrusion height of the hydroformed 316L SS/Al clad T-branch. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5):727–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5872-x10.1007/s00170-014-5872-x ↗
12. Sato H, Manabe K, Wei D et al (2016) Tribological behavior in micro–sheet hydroforming. Tribol Int 97:302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.01.04110.1016/j.triboint.2016.01.041 ↗
13. Xu XF, Wu KW, Wu YW et al (2019) A novel lubrication method for hydroforming of thin-walled aluminum alloy T-shaped tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(5–8):2265–2273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03339-410.1007/s00170-019-03339-4 ↗
14. Xu JJ, Xu XF, Fan YB et al (2023) The effect of differential lubrication and counter punch on hydroforming of 5A02 thin-walled aluminum alloy Y-shaped tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 127(5–6):2775–278410.1007/s00170-023-11526-7 ↗
15. Wang L, Zhang JM, Sun J et al (2021) Influence of friction coefficient on wall thickness distribution after hydroforming for aviation aluminum alloy tee pipe. Forging Stamp Technol 46(4):101–105. https://doi.org/10.13330/j.issn.1000-3940.2021.04.01610.13330/j.issn.1000-3940.2021.04.016 ↗
16. Yasui H, Yoshihara S, Mori S et al (2020) Material deformation behavior in T-shape hydroforming of metal microtubes. Metals 10(2):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1002019910.3390/met10020199 ↗
17. Hwang YM, Lin TC, Chang WC (2007) Experiments on T-shape hydroforming with counter punch. J Mater Process Technol 192:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.08710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.087 ↗
18. Hwang YM, Wang KH (2010) Study on y-shape tube hydroforming of magnesium alloys at elevated temperatures. Int J Mater Form 3(1):175–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0735-y10.1007/s12289-010-0735-y ↗
19. Cheng DM, Teng BG, Guo B et al (2009) Thickness distribution of a hydroformed Y-shape tube. Mater Sci Eng A 499(1):36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.10010.1016/j.msea.2007.09.100 ↗
20. Manabe K, Chen X, Kobayashi D (2014) Virtual fuzzy in-process control of Y-shape tube hydroforming with different branch top shapes. AIP Conf Proc 1618(1):307–310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.489773510.1063/1.4897735 ↗
21. Xiao Y (2019) Study on influencing factors of internal high-pressure forming in Y-shaped tubes and wall thickness distribution optimization (Master’s thesis). Nanchang Hangkong University.
22. Siano D (2011) Three-dimensional/one-dimensional numerical correlation study of a three-pass perforated tube. SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY 19(4):1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.04.00510.1016/j.simpat.2010.04.005 ↗
23. Li SG (2009) Foundamental study on tube hydroforming process. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics [2024-04-08].