journal article·2025-03Open access

Subscale modeling of material flow in orthogonal metal cutting

Ahmet Semih Erturk, Ragnar Larsson

Abstract

Abstract Enhanced simulation capability for the cutting process is crucial to making quick evaluations of cutting forces and temperatures, which are significant for assessing the machinability of the workpiece material and predicting tool wear. In this paper, the material flow in orthogonal cutting, including primary and secondary shear zones, is represented by a viscous/viscoplastic model that includes the temperature-sensitive Johnson-Cook flow stress model. A stabilized staggered finite element procedure is developed to handle incompressible Navier-Stokes material flow in combination with convection-dominated hardening and thermomechanical interaction. To handle material flow at tool-workpiece contact, a mixed method is used to reduce spurious oscillations in contact stresses along with simplified heat transfer in the tool-workpiece interface. A novel feature is that the velocity field is resolved as a subscale field to the velocity field of the distributed primary zone deformation model. It appears that the finite element solution to the subscale material flow model is significantly more cost-effective in contrast to directly addressing the velocity field and compared to the chip-forming simulations (DEFORM 2D). The cutting forces, temperature, and stress-strain state of the material in the critical deformation regions can be accurately estimated using the subscale model. The results obtained show that the trend of the estimated forces and temperatures is consistent with our experimental measurements, the DEFORM 2D simulations, and the experimental data from the literature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Tay A, Stevenson M, Vahl Davis G (1974) Using the finite element method to determine temperature distributions in orthogonal machining. Proc Inst Mech Eng 188(1):627–63810.1243/PIME_PROC_1974_188_074_02 ↗
2. Vaz M, Owen D, Kalhori V, Lundblad M, Lindgren L-E (2007) Modeling and simulation of machining processes. Arch Comput Methods Eng 14:173–20410.1007/s11831-007-9005-7 ↗
3. Ambati R, Yuan H (2011) Fem mesh-dependence in cutting process simulations. Int J Adv Manu Technol 53:313–32310.1007/s00170-010-2818-9 ↗
4. Seshadri R, Naveen I, Srinivasan S, Viswasubrahmanyam M, VijaySekar KS, Pradeep Kumar M (2013) Finite element simulation of the orthogonal machining process with al 2024 t351 aerospace alloy. Procedia Eng 64:1454–146310.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.227 ↗
5. Strenkowski JS, Moon K-J (1990) Finite Element Prediction of Chip Geometry and Tool/Workpiece Temperature Distributions in Orthogonal Metal Cutting. J Eng Ind 112(4):313–31810.1115/1.2899593 ↗
6. Lin ZC, Lin SY (1992) A Coupled Finite Element Model of Thermo-Elastic-Plastic Large Deformation for Orthogonal Cutting. J Eng Mater Technol 114(2):218–22610.1115/1.2904165 ↗
7. Idelsohn SR, Oñate E, Del Pin F (2004) The particle finite element method: a powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free-surfaces and breaking waves. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61:964–98910.1002/nme.1096 ↗
8. Rodríguez JM, Jonsén P, Svoboda A (2017) Simulation of metal cutting using the particle finite-element method and a physically based plasticity model. Comput Part Mech 4:35–5110.1007/s40571-016-0120-9 ↗
9. Movahhedy M, Gadala MS, Altintas Y (2000) Simulation of the orthogonal metal cutting process using an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite-element method. J Mater Process Technol 103(2):267–27510.1016/S0924-0136(00)00480-5 ↗
10. Arrazola PJ, A. Villar DU, Marya S (2007) Serrated chip prediction in finite element modeling of the chip formation process. Mach Sci Technol 11(3):367–390
11. Umbrello D (2008) Finite element simulation of conventional and high speed machining of ti6al4v alloy. J Mater Process Technol 196(1):79–8710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.007 ↗
12. Pantalé O, Bacaria J-L, Dalverny O, Rakotomalala R, Caperaa S (2004) 2d and 3d numerical models of metal cutting with damage effects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(39):4383–439910.1016/j.cma.2003.12.062 ↗
13. Rodriguez JM, Carbonell JM, Cante JC, Oliver J (2016) The particle finite element method (pfem) in thermo-mechanical problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 107:733–78510.1002/nme.5186 ↗
14. Shi B, Attia H, Tounsi N (2010) Identification of Material Constitutive Laws for Machining-Part I: An Analytical Model Describing the Stress, Strain, Strain Rate, and Temperature Fields in the Primary Shear Zone in Orthogonal Metal Cutting. J Manuf Sci Eng 132(5):05100810.1115/1.4002454 ↗
15. Shi B, Attia H, Tounsi N (2010) Identification of Material Constitutive Laws for Machining-Part II: Generation of the Constitutive Data and Validation of the Constitutive Law. J Manuf Sci Eng 132(5):05100910.1115/1.4002455 ↗
16. Johnson GR, Cook W (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proc. 7th international symposium on ballistics, pp 541–547
17. Svenning E (2016) A weak penalty formulation remedying traction oscillations in interface elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 310:460–47410.1016/j.cma.2016.07.031 ↗
18. Tokpavi DL, Magnin A, Jay P (2008) Very slow flow of Bingham viscoplastic fluid around a circular cylinder. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 154:65–7610.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.02.006 ↗
19. Zisis T, Mitsoulis E (2002) Viscoplastic flow around a cylinder kept between parallel plates. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 105:1–2010.1016/S0377-0257(02)00025-3 ↗
20. Leppert C, Dinkler D (2005) A fluid mechanical model for granular flow in silos. Proc Appl Math Mech 510.1002/pamm.200510131 ↗
21. Jabir SM, Noorsyakirah A, Afian OM, Nurazilah MZ, Aswad MA, Afiq NHM, Mazlan M (2016) Analysis of the rheological behavior of copper metal injection molding (mim) feedstock. Procedia Chem 19:148–15210.1016/j.proche.2016.03.013 ↗
22. Kazban RV, Mason JJ (2007) Fluid mechanics approach to machining at high speeds: Part i: Justification of potential flow models. Mach Sci Technol 11(4):475–48910.1080/10910340701696864 ↗
23. Kazban RV, Mason JJ (2007) Fluid mechanics approach to machining at high speeds: Part ii: A potential flow model. Mach Sci Technol 11(4):491–51410.1080/10910340701696914 ↗
24. Klocke F, Brockmann M, Gierlings S, Veselovac D, Kever D, Roidl B, Schmidt G, Semmler U (2015) Analytical modelling methods for temperature fields in metal cutting based on panel method of fluid mechanics. Procedia CIRP 31:352–35610.1016/j.procir.2015.03.067 ↗
25. Gierlings S, Brockmann M (2013) Analytical modelling of temperature distribution using potential theory by reference to broaching of nickel-based alloys. In: WGP Congress 2013. Advanced Materials Research, vol 769, pp 139–146. Trans Tech Publications Ltd10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.769.139 ↗
26. Rokoš O, Ameen MM, Peerlings RHJ, Geers MGD (2020) Micromorphic computational homogenization for mechanical metamaterials with patterning fluctuation fields. J Mech Phys Solids 123:119–13710.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.019 ↗
27. Donea J, Huerta A (2003) Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems. Wiley, Chichester, England10.1002/0470013826 ↗
28. Grzesik W (2008) Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials: Theory. Elsevier, Modelling and Applications
29. Erturk AS, Malakizadi A, Larsson R (2021) A thermomechanically motivated approach for identification of flow stress properties in metal cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:1055–106810.1007/s00170-020-06121-z ↗
30. Tobiska L, Lube G (1991) A modified streamline diffusion method for solving the stationary Navier-stokes equation. Numer Math 59:13–2910.1007/BF01385768 ↗
31. Malakizadi A, Cedergren S, Sadik I, Nyborg L (2016) Inverse identification of flow stress in metal cutting process using Response Surface Methodology. Simul Model Pract Theory 60:40–5310.1016/j.simpat.2015.09.009 ↗
32. Abboud E, Shi B, Attia H, Thomson V, Mebrahtu Y (2013) Finite Element-based Modeling of Machining-induced Residual Stresses in Ti-6Al-4 V under Finish Turning Conditions. Procedia CIRP 8:63–6810.1016/j.procir.2013.06.066 ↗
33. Jafarian F, Imaz Ciaran M, Umbrello D, Arrazola PJ, Filice L, Amirabadi H (2014) Finite element simulation of machining Inconel 718 alloy including microstructure changes. Int J Mech Sci 88:110–12110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.007 ↗
34. Shi G, Deng X, Shet C (2002) A finite element study of the effect of friction in orthogonal metal cutting. Finite Elem Anal Des 38(9):863–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00110-X10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00110-X ↗
35. Malakizadi A, Hosseinkhani K, Mariano E, Ng E, Del Prete A, Nyborg L (2017) Influence of friction models on FE simulation results of orthogonal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):3217–323210.1007/s00170-016-9023-4 ↗
36. Yvonnet J, Umbrello D, Chinesta F, Micari F (2006) A simple inverse procedure to determine heat flux on the tool in orthogonal cutting. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7):820–82710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.07.030 ↗
37. Huang S, Tao B, Li J, Fan Y, Yin Z (2018) Estimation of the time and space-dependent heat flux distribution at the tool-chip interface during turning using an inverse method and thin film thermocouples measurement. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99:1531–154310.1007/s00170-018-2585-6 ↗
38. Buruaga M, Soler D, Aristimuño PX, Esnaola JA, Arrazola PJ (2018) Determining tool/chip temperatures from thermography measurements in metal cutting. Appl Therm Eng 145:305–31410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.051 ↗
39. Malakizadi A, Hosseinkhani K, Mariano E, Ng E, Prete A, Nyborg L (2016) Influence of friction models on FE simulation results of orthogonal cutting process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:3217–323210.1007/s00170-016-9023-4 ↗