journal article·2024-09Open access

Smart manufacturing platform based on input-output empirical relationships for process monitoring

Giuseppina Ambrogio, Luigino Filice, Francesco Gagliardi

Abstract

Abstract Intelligent monitoring and maintenance protocols are undoubtedly crucial for improving manufacturing processes. Accordingly, machine learning techniques and predictive control models have been customized and optimized to account for the specific characteristics of the processes under investigation. In this context, the management of manufacturing processes in a “smart way” requires the development of specific models based on input-output empirical data. The aim of the proposed research was to develop an easily customizable application integrated into a milling process executed at the laboratory level. The application was designed to identify and record the operator, the order and the specific work sequences. It also supports the operator in setting processing parameters according to the type of work sequence to be performed. The application analyses specific process outputs, such as the wear growth on the inserts of the cutter in relation to the main input process parameters: depth of cut, feed rate, and spindle speed. This analysis is implemented by leveraging empirical evidence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Abramovici M, Göbel JC, Savarino P (2016) Virtual Twins as Integrative Components of Smart products. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_20. IFIP Int Conf Product Lifecycle Management10.1007/978-3-319-54660-5_20 ↗
2. Uribe D, Baudouin C, Durand C, Bigot R (2024) Predictive control for a single–blow cold upsetting using surrogate modeling for a digital twin. Int J Mater Form 17:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01803-x10.1007/s12289-023-01803-x ↗
3. CHoi S, Youm S, Kang YS (2024) Process Derivation Methodology for Reconfigurable Smart Factory. Int J Prec Eng Manufact 25(3):497–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00820-910.1007/s12541-023-00820-9 ↗
4. Akhramovich K, Serral E, Cetina C (2024) A systematic literature review on the application of process mining to industry 4.0. Knowl Inf Syst 66(5):2699–2746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-023-02042-x10.1007/s10115-023-02042-x ↗
5. Chen Z, Huang L (2020) Digital Twin in Circular Economy: Remanufacturing in Construction. IOP Conf Series: Earth Env Sci 588(3):032014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/03201410.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032014 ↗
6. Mostafa F, Tao L, Yu W (2021) An effective architecture of digital twin system to support human decision making and AI-driven autonomy. Conc Comp: Pract Exper. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.611110.1002/cpe.6111 ↗
7. Tao F, Qi Q, Wang L, Nee AYC (2019) Digital Twins and CyberPhysical systems toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: correlation and comparison. Engineering 5(4):653–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.01410.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014 ↗
8. Castelló-Pedrero P, García-Gascón C, García-Manrique J (2023) Multiscale numerical modeling of large-format additive manufacturing processes using carbon fiber reinforced polymer for digital twin applications. Int J Mater Form 17:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-024-01811-510.1007/s12289-024-01811-5 ↗
9. Ren Y, Dong J, He J, Zhang D, Wu K, Xiong Z, Zheng P, Sun Y, Liu S (2024) A novel six-dimensional digital twin model for data management and its application in roll forming. Adv Eng Inf 61:02555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.10255510.1016/j.aei.2024.102555 ↗
10. Uribe D, Baudouin C, Durand D, Bigot R (2024) Predictive control for a single–blow cold upsetting using surrogate modeling for a digital twin. Int J Mater Form 17:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01803-x10.1007/s12289-023-01803-x ↗
11. Zi X, Gao S, Xie Y (2024) An online monitoring method of milling cutter wear condition driven by digital twin. Sci Rep 14(1):4956. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55551-210.1038/s41598-024-55551-2 ↗
12. Ghnatios C, Gerard P, Barasinski A (2023) An advanced resin reaction modeling using data-driven and digital twin techniques. Int J Mater Form 16:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01725-010.1007/s12289-022-01725-0 ↗
13. Li Y, Feng Y, Wang C, Xing Z, Ren D, Fu L (2024) Performance evaluation and optimization of the cascade refrigeration system based on the digital twin model. Appl Therm Eng 248:123160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.12316010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123160 ↗
14. Technology readiness levels (TRL) Extract from Part 19 - Commission Decision C(2014)4995, 2014