Predictive modeling of Loading paths for Hydroforming of bi-layered Y-shaped tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang L, Xu XF, Fan YB, Wei LM (2020) Loading path design of thin-walled aluminum alloy T-shaped tube hydroforming process based on the control of limit pressure. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(2):3119–3131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05526-010.1007/s00170-020-05526-0 ↗
2. Hwang YM, Manabe KI (2021) Latest Hydroforming Technology of Metallic Tubes and Sheets. Metals 11(9):1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1109136010.3390/met11091360 ↗
3. Liu CM, El-Aty AA, Lee MG, Hou Y, Xu Y, Hu SH, Cheng C, Tao J, Guo XZ (2023) Predicting the forming limits in the tube hydroforming process by coupling the cyclic plasticity model with ductile fracture criteria. J Market Res 26:109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.17710.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.177 ↗
4. Zhu HH, He ZB, Lin YL, Zheng KL, Fan XB, Yuan SJ (2019) The development of a novel forming limit diagram under nonlinear loading paths in tube hydroforming. Int J Mech Sci 172:105392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10539210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105392 ↗
5. Bell C, Corney J, Zuelli N, Savings D (2020) A state of the art review of hydroforming technology. IntJ Mater Form 13:789–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01507-110.1007/s12289-019-01507-1 ↗
6. Marlapalle BG, Hingole RS (2021) Predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process. SN Appl Sci 3:606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04533-410.1007/s42452-021-04533-4 ↗
7. Bolleboom A, deRuiter GCW, Coert JH, Tuk B, Holstege JC, van Neck JW (2019) Novel experimental surgical strategy to prevent traumatic neuroma formation by combining a 3D-printed Y-tube with an autograft. J Neurosurg 130(1):184–196. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.jns1727610.3171/2017.8.jns17276 ↗
8. Hwang YM, Zhang CH, Chen CC, Yoshihara S (2023) Feeding path and movable die design in tube hydroforming of metal bellows. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 129:2399–2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1011151810.3390/met10111518 ↗
9. Cui XL, Guo J, Zhao Y, Lin P (2023) Hydroforming process of thin-walled tubular components with multiple local bulges. Archiv Civ Mech Eng 23:169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00711-w10.1007/s43452-023-00711-w ↗
10. Zhang C, Liu W, Huang L, Wang CG, Huang HR, Lin L, Wang PC (2021) Process analysis of biconvex tube hydroforming based on loading path optimization by response surface method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:2609–2622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06411-610.1007/s00170-020-06411-6 ↗
11. Ghorbani-Menghari H, Kahhal P, Jung J, Mohammadhosseinzadeh M, Moon YH, Kim JH (2023) Multi-Objective Evolutionary Neural Network Optimization of Process Parameters for Double-Stepped Tube Hydroforming. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 24:915–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00802-x10.1007/s12541-023-00802-x ↗
12. Asnafi N, Skogsgardh A (2000) Theoretical and experimental analysis of stroke-controlled tube hydroforming. Mater Sci Eng, A 279:95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00646-210.1016/s0921-5093(99)00646-2 ↗
13. Asnafi N (1999) Analytical modelling of tube hydroforming. Thin-Walled Struct 34(4):295–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00018-X10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00018-X ↗
14. Yang B, Zhang W, Li S (2006) Analysis and finite element simulation of the tube bulge hydroforming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:453–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0272909710.1007/BF02729097 ↗
15. Zeng DZ, Deng KH, Shi TH, Lin YH, Zhu HJ, Li TL, Sun YX (2014) Theoretical and Experimental Study of Bimetal-Pipe Hydroforming. J Pressure Vessel Technol 136(6):061402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402697610.1115/1.4026976 ↗
16. Yang YY (1996) Large-scale thin plate forming technology. National Defense Industry Press, China, pp 146–163
17. Cheng DM, Teng BG, Guo B, Yuan SJ (2009) Thickness distribution of a hydroformed Y-shape tube. Mater Sci Eng, A 499(1–2):36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.10010.1016/j.msea.2007.09.100 ↗
18. Di Lorenzo R, Ingarao G, Chinesta F (2010) Integration of gradient based and response surface methods to develop a cascade optimisation strategy for Y-shaped tube hydroforming process design. Adv Eng Softw 41(2):336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.010 ↗
19. Yuan SJ (2010) Lightweight forming technologies. National Defense Industry Press, China, pp 20–21