journal article·2022-05Open access

Parametric analysis and machine learning-based parametric modeling of wire laser metal deposition induced porosity

Tanguy Loreau, Victor Champaney, Nicolas Hascoet, Jon Lambarri, Mikel Madarieta, Iker Garmendia, Francisco Chinesta

Abstract

Additive manufacturing is an appealing solution to produce geometrically complex parts, difficult to manufacture using traditional technologies. The extreme process conditions, in particular the high temperature, complex interactions and couplings, rich metallurgical transformations and combinatorial deposition trajectories, induce numerous process defects and in particular porosity. Simulating numerically porosity appearance remains extremely complex because of the multiple physics induced by the laser-material interaction, the multiple space and time scales, with a strong impact on the simulation efficiency and performances. Moreover, when analyzing parts build-up by using the wire laser metal deposition —wLMD— technology it can be noticed a significant variability in the porosity size and distribution even when process parameters remain unchanged. For these reasons the present paper aims at proposing an alternative modeling approach based on the use of neural networks to express the porosity as a function of different process parameters that will be extracted from the process analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Biswal R, Zhang X, Syed AK, Awd M, Ding J, Walther F, Williams S (2019) Criticality of porosity defects on the fatigue performance of wire+ arc additive manufactured titanium alloy. Int J Fatigue 122:208–21710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.017 ↗
2. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: A review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 23(6):1917–192810.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
3. Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part i: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics. Additive Manufacturing 8:36–6210.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001 ↗
4. Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A, Bian L, Thompson SM (2015) An overview of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; part ii: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control. Additive Manufacturing 8:12–3510.1016/j.addma.2015.07.002 ↗
5. Derekar K (2018) A review of wire arc additive manufacturing and advances in wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium. Mater Sci Technol 34(8):895–91610.1080/02670836.2018.1455012 ↗
6. Rodrigues TA, Duarte V, Miranda R, Santos TG, Oliveira J (2019) Current status and perspectives on wire and arc additive manufacturing (waam). Materials 12(7):112110.3390/ma12071121 ↗
7. Jiang-zhou S, Mu-zheng X, Zhi-jing Z, Zhi-peng Y, Jin X, Yi-chong Y (2017) Microstructural morphology and evolution of austenite stainless steel deposited using pulsed laser and wire. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(9-12):3357–337010.1007/s00170-017-0625-2 ↗
8. Akbari M, Kovacevic R (2018) An investigation on mechanical and microstructural properties of 316lsi parts fabricated by a robotized laser/wire direct metal deposition system. Additive Manufacturing 23:487–49710.1016/j.addma.2018.08.031 ↗
9. Ge J, Ma T, Chen Y, Jin T, Fu H, Xiao R, Lei Y, Lin J (2019) Wire-arc additive manufacturing h13 part: 3d pore distribution, microstructural evolution, and mechanical performances. J Alloys Compd 783:145–15510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.274 ↗
10. Hauser T, Reisch RT, Breese PP, Lutz BS, Pantano M, Nalam Y, Bela K, Kamps T, Volpp J, Kaplan AF (2021) Porosity in wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys, vol 4110.1016/j.addma.2021.101993 ↗
11. Brice CA, Schwendner KI, Mahaffey DW, Moore EH, Fraser HL (1999) Process Variable Effects on Laser Deposited Ti-6Al-4V. Solid Freeform Fabrication, pp 369–374. http://utwired.engr.utexas.edu/lff/symposium/proceedingsArchive/pubs/Manuscripts/1999/1999-043-Brice.pdf
12. Zhong C, Gasser A, Schopphoven T, Poprawe R (2015) Experimental study of porosity reduction in high deposition-rate Laser Material Deposition. Optics & Laser Technology 75:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.06.016, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003039921500178410.1016/j.optlastec.2015.06.016 ↗
13. Chekir N, Tian Y, Gauvin R, Brodusch N, Sixsmith J, Brochu M (2018) Laser wire deposition of thick ti-6al-4v buildups: Heat transfer model, microstructure, and mechanical properties evaluations. Metall and Mater Trans A 49(12):6490– 650810.1007/s11661-018-4927-2 ↗
14. Bock FE, Herrnring J, Froend M, Enz J, Kashaev N, Klusemann B (2021) Experimental and numerical thermo-mechanical analysis of wire-based laser metal deposition of al-mg alloys. J Manuf Process 64:982–99510.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.016 ↗
15. Chiumenti M, Cervera M, Salmi A, De Saracibar CA, Dialami N, Matsui K (2010) Finite element modeling of multi-pass welding and shaped metal deposition processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(37-40):2343–235910.1016/j.cma.2010.02.018 ↗
16. Bai X, Colegrove P, Ding J, Zhou X, Diao C, Bridgeman P, roman Hönnige J, Zhang H, Williams S (2018) Numerical analysis of heat transfer and fluid flow in multilayer deposition of paw-based wire and arc additive manufacturing. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 124:504–51610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.085 ↗
17. Martin AA, Calta NP, Khairallah SA, Wang J, Depond PJ, Fong AY, Thampy V, Guss GM, Kiss AM, Stone KH et al (2019) Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 10(1): 1–1010.1038/s41467-018-07882-8 ↗
18. Arrizubieta JI, Lamikiz A, Cortina M, Ukar E, Alberdi A (2018) Hardness, grainsize and porosity formation prediction on the laser metal deposition of aisi 304 stainless steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 135:53–6410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.08.004 ↗
19. Ning J, Wang W, Zamorano B, Liang SY (2019) Analytical modeling of lack-of-fusion porosity in metal additive manufacturing. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing 125(11):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-3092-910.1007/s00339-019-3092-9 ↗
20. Bayat M, Mohanty S, Hattel JH (2019) Multiphysics modelling of lack-of-fusion voids formation and evolution in IN718 made by multi-track/multi-layer l-PBF. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 139:95–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.00310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.003 ↗
21. Xia M, Gu D, Yu G, Dai D, Chen H, Shi Q (2017) Porosity evolution and its thermodynamic mechanism of randomly packed powder-bed during selective laser melting of Inconel 718 alloy. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 116:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.01.005, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089069551630538710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.01.005 ↗
22. Panwisawas C, Qiu CL, Sovani Y, Brooks JW, Attallah MM, Basoalto HC (2015) On the role of thermal fluid dynamics into the evolution of porosity during selective laser melting. Scripta Materialia 105:14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.016, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135964621500158X10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.016 ↗
23. Wang C, Tan X, Tor S, Lim C (2020) Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives, Additive Manufacturing, pp 10153810.1016/j.addma.2020.101538 ↗
24. Garg A, Lam JSL, Savalani M (2015) A new computational intelligence approach in formulation of functional relationship of open porosity of the additive manufacturing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1):555–56510.1007/s00170-015-6989-2 ↗
25. Khanzadeh M, Chowdhury S, Tschopp MA, Doude HR, Marufuzzaman M, Bian L (2019) In-situ monitoring of melt pool images for porosity prediction in directed energy deposition processes. IISE Trans 51(5):437–45510.1080/24725854.2017.1417656 ↗
26. Tian Q, Guo S, Guo Y, et al. (2020) A physics-driven deep learning model for process-porosity causal relationship and porosity prediction with interpretability in laser metal deposition. CIRP Ann 69(1):205–20810.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.049 ↗
27. Kingma DP, Ba J Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980
28. Scikit-Learn MLPRegressor—Reference Manual, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor.html?highlight=mlpregressor#sklearn.neural_network.MLPRegressor, [Online; accessed 28-May-2021] (2021)