journal article·2021-05

Pre-stress state in cork agglomerates: simulation of the compression moulding process

Marco Delucia, Anita Catapano, Marco Montemurro, Jérôme Pailhès

Publisher page

Abstract

In the present work, a physically-based finite element model simulating the compression moulding process of cork-based agglomerates is presented. The goal is the prediction of the pre-stress state due to the process and its influence on the macroscopic mechanical properties of the agglomerate. An ad-hoc algorithm simulating the mould filling phase (based on a generalised Voronoi’s tesselation algorithm which is paired with a 2D physics engine) as well as the moulding compression phase is presented. A numerical campaign is conducted to show the effectiveness of the modelling strategy and to assess the influence of packing density on the behaviour of the agglomerate. For all considered cases, the stress-strain and time dependent density curves of the agglomerate show that a high packing density configuration, resulting from a proper selection of particles size mixing, allows obtaining higher tangent moduli than that of natural cork with a lower material density.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Alfonso D, Alves de Sousa R, Torcato R, Pires L (2019) Incremental forming as a rapid tooling process. Springer International Publishing, Berlin10.1007/978-3-030-15360-1 ↗
2. Anjos O, Pereira H, Rosa ME (2008) Effect of quality, porosity and density on the compression properties of cork. Holz als Roh - und Werkstoff 66(4):295–30110.1007/s00107-008-0248-2 ↗
3. Anjos O, Rodrigues C, Morais J, Pereira H (2014) Effect of density on the compression behaviour of cork. Mater Des 53:1089–109610.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.038 ↗
4. ANSYS I (2019) Workbench User’s Guide. Canonsburg, PA 15317. 18 edn.
5. Baer M (2002) Modeling heterogeneous energetic materials at the mesoscale. Thermochim Acta 384(1):351–36710.1016/S0040-6031(01)00794-8 ↗
6. Baraff D (1989) Analytical methods for dynamic simulation of non-penetrating rigid bodies. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Digital Library, pp 223–23210.1145/74334.74356 ↗
7. Benson D, Tong W, Ravichandran G (1995) Particle-level modeling of dynamic consolidation of ti-SiC powders. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 3(6):771–79610.1088/0965-0393/3/6/003 ↗
8. Blomqvist V (2020). Pymunk. http://www.pymunk.org/, (Last accessed: 2020-05-28)
9. Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2008) Mesoscale calculations of the dynamic behavior of a granular ceramic. Int J Solids Struct 45(6):1676–169610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.027 ↗
10. Catapano A, Jumel J (2015) A numerical approach for determining the effective elastic symmetries of particulate-polymer composites. Compos B Eng 78:227–24310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.085 ↗
11. Crawford DA (2006) Using mesoscale modeling to investigate the role of material heterogeneity in geologic and planetary materials. AIP Conf Proc 845(1):1453–145710.1063/1.2263598 ↗
12. De Larrard F (1999) Concrete mixture-proportioning: a scientific approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781482272055 ↗
13. Delucia M, Catapano A, Montemurro M, Pailhès J (2019) Determination of the effective thermoelastic properties of cork-based agglomerates. J Reinf Plast Compos 38(16):760–77610.1177/0731684419846991 ↗
14. Delucia M, Catapano A, Montemurro M, Pailhés J (2020) A stochastic approach for predicting the temperature-dependent elastic properties of cork-based composites. Mech. Mater. 14510.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103399 ↗
15. Fátima Vaz M, Fortes MA (1998) Friction properties of cork. J Mater Sci 33:2087–209310.1023/A:1004315118535 ↗
16. Gentieu T (2018) Development of filled polymers for the replacement of ceramics used as ballistic protection layer. PhD thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Oxford Brookes University
17. Gentieu T, Catapano A, Jumel J, Broughton J (2017) Computational modelling of particulate-reinforced materials up to high volume fractions: Linear elastic homogenisation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt L J Mater Des Appl 233(6):1101–1116
18. Gibson LJ, Easterling KE, Ashby MF (1981) The Structure and Mechanics of Cork. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical. Phys Eng Sci 377(1769):99–117
19. Guendelman E, Bridson R, Fedkiw R (2003) Nonconvex rigid bodies with stacking. ACM Trans Graph 22(3):871–87810.1145/882262.882358 ↗
20. Huang F, An X, Zhang Y, Yu A (2017) Multi-particle FEM simulation of 2d compaction on binary al/sic composite powders. Powder Technol 314:39–48. special Issue on Simulation and Modelling of Particulate Systems10.1016/j.powtec.2017.03.017 ↗
21. Jardin R, Fernandes F, Pereira A, Alves de Sousa R (2015) Static and dynamic mechanical response of different cork agglomerates. Mater Des 68:121–12610.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.016 ↗
22. Kim S (2011) A study on cork-based plastic composite material. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
23. Kwan A, Chan K, Wong V (2013) A 3-parameter particle packing model incorporating the wedging effect. Powder Technol 237:172–17910.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.043 ↗
24. Kwan A, Wong V, Fung W (2015) A 3-parameter packing density model for angular rock aggregate particles. Powder Technol 274:154–16210.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.054 ↗
25. Le Barbenchon L, Girardot J, Kopp J, Viot P (2013) Strain rate effect on the compressive behaviour of reinforced cork agglomerates. In: EPJ Web of Conferences, vol 183, pp 1–610.1051/epjconf/201818303018 ↗
26. Lowe CA, Greenaway MW (2005) Compaction processes in granular beds composed of different particle sizes. J Appl Phys 98(12):12351910.1063/1.2149167 ↗
27. Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11:582–59210.1063/1.1712836 ↗
28. Moszumanski R, Trzepiecinski T (2018) FEM numerical analysis of the compaction of a mixture of brake pad components taking account of the real shapes and dimensions of particles. Met Mater 56:357–366
29. Nesterenko VF (2001) Dynamics of heterogeneous materials. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-3524-6 ↗
30. Pereira H (2007) Cork: biology, production and uses. Elsevier, Amsterdam
31. Santos PT, Pinto S, Marques PA, Pereira AB, Alves de Sousa RJ (2017) Agglomerated cork: A way to tailor its mechanical properties. Compos Struct 178:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.035 ↗
32. Williamson RL (1990) Parametric studies of dynamic powder consolidation using a particle-level numerical model. J Appl Phys 68(3):1287–129610.1063/1.346730 ↗
33. Yano K, Horie Y (1999) Discrete-element modeling of shock compression of polycrystalline copper. Phys Rev B 59:13672–1368010.1103/PhysRevB.59.13672 ↗
34. Yu A, Bridgwater J, Burbidge A (1997) On the modelling of the packing of fine particles. Powder Technol 92(3):185–19410.1016/S0032-5910(97)03219-1 ↗
35. Zhang YX, An XZ, Zhang YL (2015) Multi-particle FEM modeling on microscopic behavior of 2d particle compaction. Appl Phys A 118:1015–102110.1007/s00339-014-8861-x ↗