Achieving thin wall and high surface quality of magnesium alloy tubes in combined process of hollow sinking after die-less mandrel drawing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dimensions and surface roughness of magnesium alloy tubes were evaluated to elucidate the flattening behavior of asperity on the outer surface and the optimal condition for achieving thin wall and high surface quality in the combined process of the hollow sinking after die-less mandrel drawing. ZM21 tubes were drawn using a die after die-less mandrel drawing. Dimensions and surface roughness were measured, and the stress state of the asperity during hollow sinking was evaluated using finite element and slab methods. The results indicated that in hollow sinking after die-less mandrel drawing when the speed ratio was large, both a thin wall and high inner and outer surface qualities can be achieved under low die reduction, where the outer surface roughness was the least, owing to relatively large die pressure and drawing stress. Additionally, enhancing the flattening of the asperity due to bulk plastic deformation in tension was difficult even if drawing stress increased when the speed ratio in die-less mandrel drawing was large. Therefore, when the speed ratio of the die-less mandrel drawing was large before hollow sinking, the largest outer surface flattening was achieved under low die reduction, wherein die pressure was large.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Hermawan H, Dubé D, Mantovani D (2010) Developments in metallic biodegradable stents. Acta Biomater 6:1693–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.00610.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.006 ↗
2. Ma J, Zhao N, Betts L, Zhu D (2016) Bio-adaption between magnesium alloy stent and the blood vessel: A review. J Mater Sci Technol 32:815–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.01810.1016/j.jmst.2015.12.018 ↗
3. Sezer N, Evis Z, Kayhan SM, Tahmasebifar A, Koç M (2018) Review of magnesium-based biomaterials and their applications. J Magnes Alloy 6:23–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.00310.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003 ↗
4. Ryu H, Seo MH, Rogers JA (2021) Bioresorbable metals for biomedical applications: from mechanical components to electronic devices. Adv Healthc Mater 10:20002236. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20200223610.1002/adhm.202002236 ↗
5. Wang C, Yu Z, Cui Y, Zhang Y, Yu S, Qu G, Gong H (2016) Processing of a novel Zn alloy micro-tube for biodegradable vascular stent application. J Mater Sci Technol 32:925–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.0010.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.00 ↗
6. Song G, Zhao HQ, Liu Q, Fan Z (2022) A review on biodegradable biliary stents: materials and future trends. Bioact Mater 17:488–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.01710.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.017 ↗
7. Kishimoto T, Gondo S, Takemoto K, Tashima K, Suzuki S (2019) Conditions for wall thickness reduction in hollow sinking of SUS304 tubes with drawing speed control in entrance and exit sides of die. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 141:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404471010.1115/1.4044710 ↗
8. Kishimoto T, Sakaguchi H, Suematsu S, Tashima K, Kajino S, Gondo S, Suzuki S (2020) Outer diameter and surface quality of micro metal tubes in hollow sinking. Procedia Manuf 47:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.19210.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.192 ↗
9. Yoshida K, Furuya H (2004) Mandrel drawing and plug drawing of shape-memory-alloy fine tubes used in catheters and stents. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.18210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.182 ↗
10. Bui QH, Bihamta R, Guillot M, Rahem A, Fafard M (2011) Effect of cross section reduction on the mechanical properties of aluminium tubes drawn with variable wall thickness. J Manuf Sci Eng 133:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400504010.1115/1.4005040 ↗
11. Yoshida K, Watanabe M, Ishikawa H (2001) Drawing of Ni-Ti shape-memory-alloy fine tubes used in medical tests. J Mater Process Technol 118:251–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00930-X10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00930-X ↗
12. Wang J, Zhou Y, Yang Z, Zhu S, Wang L, Guan S (2018) Processing and properties of magnesium alloy micro-tubes for biodegradable vascular stents. Mater Sci Eng C 90:504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.00510.1016/j.msec.2018.05.005 ↗
13. Hanada K, Matsuzaki K, Huang X, Chino Y (2013) Fabrication of Mg alloy tubes for biodegradable stent application. Mater Sci Eng C 33:4746–4750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.03310.1016/j.msec.2013.07.033 ↗
14. Weiss D (1969) Dieless wire drawing with transformation plasticity. Wire J 9:182–189
15. Hashmi MSJ (1985) A note on the prospects of plasto-hydrodynamic die-less tube sinking. J Mech Work Tech 11:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3804(85)90028-210.1016/0378-3804(85)90028-2 ↗
16. Furushima T, Manabe K (2017) A novel superplastic dieless drawing process of ceramic tubes. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 66:265–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.11810.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.118 ↗
17. Hwang YM, Kuo TY (2013) Dieless drawing of stainless steel tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4922-010.1007/s00170-013-4922-0 ↗
18. Furushima T, Manabe K (2012) Workability of AZ31 magnesium alloy tubes in dieless drawing process. Steel Res Int 851–854
19. Furushima T, Manabe K (2018) Large reduction die-less mandrel drawing of magnesium alloy micro-tubes. CIRP Ann 67:309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.10110.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.101 ↗
20. Uppal G, Thakur A, Chauhan A, Bala S (2022) Magnesium based implants for functional bone tissue regeneration – A review. J Magnes Alloy 10:356–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.01710.1016/j.jma.2021.08.017 ↗
21. Sajjad U, Abbas A, Sadeghianjahromi A, Abbas N, Liaw JS, Wang CC (2021) Enhancing corrosion resistance of Al 5050 alloy based on surface roughness and its fabrication methods; an experimental investigation. J Mater Res Technol 11:1859–1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.09610.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.096 ↗
22. Sun Q, Yang M, Jiang Y, Lei L, Zhang Y (2022) Achieving excellent corrosion resistance properties of 7075 Al alloy via ultrasonic surface rolling treatment. J Alloys Compd 911:165009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16500910.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165009 ↗
23. Langi E, Zhao LG, Jamshidi P, Attallah M, Silberschmidt VV, Willcock H, Vogt F (2022) A comparative study of microstructures and nanomechanical properties of additively manufactured and commercial metallic stents. Mater Today Commun 31:103372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10337210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103372 ↗
24. Milenin A, Furushima T, Němeček J (2020) Transformation of surface roughness of Mg alloy tubes during laser dieless drawing. J Mater Eng Perform 29:7736–7743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05234-610.1007/s11665-020-05234-6 ↗
25. Milenin A, Wróbel M, Kustra P (2022) Investigation of the workability and surface roughness of thin brass wires in various dieless drawing technologies. Arch Civ Mech Eng 20:86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00331-210.1007/s43452-021-00331-2 ↗
26. Kishimoto T, Du P, Furushima T (2022) Effect of microstructure on outer surface roughening of magnesium alloy tubes in die-less mandrel drawing. J Magnes Alloy 10:2730–2744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2022.02.00110.1016/j.jma.2022.02.001 ↗
27. Du P, Furusawa S, Furushima T (2020) Microstructure and performance of biodegradable magnesium alloy tubes fabricated by local-heating-assisted dieless drawing. J Magnes Alloy 8:614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2020.05.00910.1016/j.jma.2020.05.009 ↗
28. Bay N, Wanheim T, Petersen AS (1975) Ra and the average effective strain of surface asperities deformed in metal-working processes. Wear 34:77–8410.1016/0043-1648(75)90310-5 ↗
29. Wang ZG, Dong WZ, Osakada K (2018) Determination of friction law in metal forming under oil-lubricated condition. CIRP Ann 67:257–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.02710.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.027 ↗
30. Ike H, Makinouchi A (1990) Effect of lateral tension and compression on plane strain flattening processes of surface asperities lying over a plastically deformable bulk. Wear 140:17–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(90)90119-U10.1016/0043-1648(90)90119-U ↗
31. Moore GG, Wallace JF (1961) Theoretical study of tube sinking through conical dies. J Mech Eng Sci 3:225–235. https://doi.org/10.1243/jmes_jour_1961_003_029_0210.1243/jmes_jour_1961_003_029_02 ↗
32. Baek HM, Jin YG, Hwang SK, Im YT, Son IH, Lee DL (2012) Numerical study on the evolution of surface defects in wire drawing. J Mater Process Technol 212:776–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.02810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.028 ↗
33. Shinohara T, Yoshida K (2005) Deformation analysis of surface flaws in stainless steel wire drawing. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:579–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.12510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.125 ↗
34. ISO 25178: 2012 Geometric Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: areal is an International Organisation for Standardisation collection of international standards relating to the analysis of 3D areal surface texture
35. Király M, Antók DM, Horváth L, Hózer Z (2018) Evaluation of axial and tangential ultimate tensile strength of zirconium cladding tubes. Nucl Eng Technol 50:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.01.00210.1016/j.net.2018.01.002 ↗
36. Dodyim N, Yoshida K, Murata T, Kobayashi Y (2020) Drawing of magnesium fine wire and medical application of drawn wire. Procedia Manuf 50:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.05010.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.050 ↗
37. Sa C, Wilson WRD (1994) Full film lubrication of strip Rollong. ASME J Tribol 116:569–576. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.292888410.1115/1.2928884 ↗
38. Osakada K, Oyane M (1971) On the roughening of free surface in deformation processes. Bull JSME 14:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.14.17110.1299/jsme1958.14.171 ↗
39. Nielsen CV, Martins PAF, Bay N (2016) Modelling of real area of contact between tool and workpiece in metal forming processes including the influence of subsurface deformation. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 65:261–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.12610.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.126 ↗
40. ISO 4288: 1996, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: Profile method - Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture
41. Wanheim T, Bay N, Petersen AS (1974) A theoretically determined model for friction in metal working processes. Wear 28:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(74)90165-310.1016/0043-1648(74)90165-3 ↗
42. Sutcliffe MPF (1988) Surface asperity deformation in metal forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 30:847–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(88)90010-010.1016/0020-7403(88)90010-0 ↗
43. Zwicker MFR, Spangenberg J, Bay N, Martins PAF, Nielsen CV (2022) The influence of strain hardening and surface flank angles on asperity flattening under subsurface deformation at low normal pressures. Tribol Int 167:107416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.10741610.1016/j.triboint.2021.107416 ↗
44. Kishimoto T, Sakaguchi H, Suematsu S, Tashima K, Kajino S, Gondo S, Suzuki S (2020) Deformation behavior causing excessive thinning of outer diameter of micro metal tubes in hollow sinking. Metals (Basel) 10:1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1010131510.3390/met10101315 ↗
45. Kishimoto T, Sakaguchi H, Suematsu S, Tashima K, Kajino S, Gondo S, Suzuki S (2021) Effect of crystal orientation on inner surface rougness of micro metal tubes in hollow sinking. Mater Sci Eng A 805:140792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14079210.1016/j.msea.2021.140792 ↗
46. Suematsu S, Kishimoto T, Sakaguchi H, Tashima K, Kajino S, Gondo S, Suzuki S (2021) Inner Surface Roughness Evolution and Slip Deformation of Micro Metal Tube During Hollow Sinking. Met 2021 - 30th Anniv Int Conf Metall Mater Conf Proc 282–287. https://doi.org/10.37904/metal.2021.410010.37904/metal.2021.4100 ↗