Hybrid twin models of fiber compaction for composite manufacturing based on dual kriging
Source abstract
Abstract
During the preforming stage in Liquid Composite Molding (LCM), dry fibrous reinforcements are compacted to obtain a specific fiber volume fraction. Knowledge of the compaction force required to close the mold is an important information in Resin Transfer Molding (RTM), a composite manufacturing process in which the liquid polymer resin is injected through the fibrous reinforcement contained in a rigid and closed mold. In a related process called Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion (VARI), the reinforcement is firstly compacted under vacuum, and then expands as the resin flows through the fiber bed. Numerous studies have been carried out to model the compression and relaxation of engineering textiles, which display a complex viscoelastic response under load, strongly dependent on fiber architecture. The various kinds of fibrous reinforcements and stacking sequences complicate the analysis. Experiments are necessary to provide reliable experimental data. Three families of reinforcements will be investigated under various experimental conditions: a Continuous Fiber Mat (CFM), a two-dimensional (2D) Non-Crimp Fabric (NCF) and a three-dimensional (3D) Interlock fabric. A new approach based on dual kriging, a multi-dimensional statistical interpolation method, is used to reproduce the compaction behaviors. A second approach, also based on dual kriging, is proposed to create Hybrid Twin (HT) models by combining experimental information on compaction with existing analytical models.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Bickerton S, Buntain MJ, Somashekar AA (2003) The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding preforms. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 34:431–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00088-510.1016/S1359-835X(03)00088-5 ↗
2. Kelly PA, Umer R, Bickerton S (2006) Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 37:868–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.008 ↗
3. Stankovic SB (2008) Compression hysteresis of fibrous systems. Polymer Eng Sci 48(Compendex):676–68210.1002/pen.20994 ↗
4. Chinesta F, Cueto E, Abisset-Chavanne E, Duval JL, Khaldi FE (2020) Virtual, Digital and Hybrid Twins: A New Paradigm in Data-Based Engineering and Engineered Data. Arch Comput Methods Eng 27(1):105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-018-9301-410.1007/s11831-018-9301-4 ↗
5. Krige DG (1953) Statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on Witwatersrand. Inst Mine Survey South Africa J 7(4):145–154
6. Trochu F (1993) Contouring program based on dual kriging interpolation. Eng Comput 9(Compendex):160–17710.1007/BF01206346 ↗
7. Echaabi J, Trochu F, Gauvin R (1995) A general strength theory for composite materials based on dual kriging interpolation. J Reinf Plast Compos 14(3):211–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844950140030210.1177/073168449501400302 ↗
8. Hilal S (2018) Caractérisation par microtomographie de la mésostructure des renforts fibreux pour la fabrication de composites. Ecole Polytechn, Montreal (Canada)
9. van Wyk CM (1946) 20—Note on the compressibility of wool. J Textile Inst Transact 37(12):T285–T292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1944702460865927910.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
10. Abdellaoui H, Echaabi J (2014) Rheological models for modeling the viscoelastic behavior in liquid composite molding processes (LCM) review. J Reinforced Plastics Compos 33(8):714–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441351862110.1177/0731684413518621 ↗
11. Charmetant A, Orliac JG, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P (2012) Hyperelastic model for large deformation analyses of 3D Interlock composite preforms. Compos Sci Technol 72(12):1352–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.006 ↗
12. Robitaille F, Gauvin R (1998) Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. I: Review of experimental results. Polym Compos 19:198–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1009110.1002/pc.10091 ↗
13. Robitaille F, Gauvin R (1998) Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. II: Compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O-saturated woven reinforcements. Polym Compos 19(5):543–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1012810.1002/pc.10128 ↗
14. Renaud J, Vernet N, Ruiz E, Lebel LL (2016) Creep compaction behavior of 3D carbon Interlock fabrics with lubrication and temperature. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 86:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.017 ↗
15. Lomov SV, Verpoest I, Peeters T, Roose D, Zako M (2003) Nesting in textile laminates: geometrical modelling of the laminate. Compos Sci Technol 63(7):993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-4 ↗
16. Huang W, Causse P, Hu H, Trochu F (2020) Numerical and experimental investigation of saturated transverse permeability of 2D woven glass fabrics based on material twins. Polym Compos 41(4):1341–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2545810.1002/pc.25458 ↗
17. Vernet N, Trochu F (2016) Analysis and modeling of 3D Interlock fabric compaction behavior. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 80:182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.024 ↗
18. Karbhari VM, Simacek P (1996) Notes on the modeling of preform compaction: II - effect of sizing on bundle level micromechanics. J Reinforced Plastics Compos 15(Compendex):837–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844960150080710.1177/073168449601500807 ↗
19. Van Wyk CM (1946) A study of the compressibility of wool, with special reference to South African Merino wool. Onderstepoort J Vet Sci Animal Industry 21(1):99–226
20. van Luijk CJ, Carr AJ, Carnaby GA (1985) 2—The mechanics of staple-fibre yarns Part i: modelling assumptions. J Textile Inst 76(1):11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500850863177410.1080/00405008508631774 ↗
21. van Luijk CJ, Carr AJ, Carnaby GA (1985) 3—THE MECHANICS OF STAPLE-FIBRE YARNS PART II: ANALYSIS AND RESULTS. J Textile Inst 76(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040500850863177510.1080/00405008508631775 ↗
22. Curiskis JI, Carnaby GA (1985) Continuum Mechanics of the Fiber Bundle. Textile Res J 55(6):334–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175850550060210.1177/004051758505500602 ↗
23. Komori T, Makishima K (1977) Numbers of Fiber-to-Fiber Contacts in General Fiber Assemblies. Textile Res J 47(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175770470010410.1177/004051757704700104 ↗
24. Lee DH, Lee JK (1985) "Initial compressional behaviour of fibre assembly, in “Objective Measurement: Applications to Product Design and Process Control,” Kawabata, S., Postle, R., Niwa, M., Eds." Textile Machinery Society of Japan, pp. 613–622
25. De Jong S, Snaith JW, Michie NA (1986) A Mechanical Model for the Lateral Compression of Woven Fabrics. Textile Res J 56(12):759–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175860560120810.1177/004051758605601208 ↗
26. Pan N, Carnaby GA (1989) Theory of the Shear Deformation of Fibrous Assemblies. Textile Res J 59(5):285–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175890590050610.1177/004051758905900506 ↗
27. Carnaby GA, Pan N (1989) Theory of the Compression Hysteresis of Fibrous Assemblies. Textile Res J 59(5):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175890590050510.1177/004051758905900505 ↗
28. Komori T, Itoh M (1991) A New Approach to the Theory of the Compression of Fiber Assemblies. Textile Res J 61(7):420–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175910610070910.1177/004051759106100709 ↗
29. Komori T, Itoh M (1997) Analyzing the Compressibility of a Random Fiber Mass Based on the Modified Theory of Fiber Contact. Textile Res J 67(3):204–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175970670030810.1177/004051759706700308 ↗
30. Chen B, Chou T-W (1999) Compaction of woven-fabric preforms in liquid composite molding processes: single-layer deformation. Compos Sci Technol 59(10):1519–1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00002-010.1016/S0266-3538(99)00002-0 ↗
31. Chen B, Chou T-W (2000) Compaction of woven-fabric preforms: nesting and multi-layer deformation. Compos Sci Technol 60(12):2223–2231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00017-810.1016/S0266-3538(00)00017-8 ↗
32. Gutowski T (1997) Advanced composites manufacturing. Wiley & sons, New York
33. Simacek P, Karbhari VM (1996) Notes on the modeling of preform compaction: I - micromechanics at the fiber bundle level. J Reinforced Plastics Compos 15(Compendex):86–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844960150010610.1177/073168449601500106 ↗
34. Toll S (1998) Packing mechanics of fiber reinforcements. Polym Eng Sci 38(8):1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1030410.1002/pen.10304 ↗
35. Gauvin R, Lemenn Y, Clerk P, Trochu F (1994) "Compaction and creep behavior of glass reinforcements for liquid composites molding," In 10th ASM/ESD technical conference, pp. 357–367
36. Pearce N, Summerscales J (1995) The compressibility of a reinforcement fabric. Compos Manuf 6(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7143(95)93709-S10.1016/0956-7143(95)93709-S ↗
37. Robitaille F, Gauvin R (1999) Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. III: Reorganization of the fiber network. Polym Compos 20(1):48–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1033410.1002/pc.10334 ↗
38. Abdellaoui H, Bouhfid R, Echaabi J, Qaiss A (2015) Experimental and modeling study of viscoelastic behaviour of woven dried jute under compressive stress. J Reinforced Plastics Compos 34(5):405–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441557381210.1177/0731684415573812 ↗
39. Chen Z-R, Ye L (2006) A micromechanical compaction model for woven fabric preforms. Part II: Multilayer. Compos Sci Technol 66(16):3263–3272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.010 ↗
40. Chen Z-R, Ye L, Kruckenberg T (2006) A micromechanical compaction model for woven fabric preforms. Part I: Single layer. Compos Sci Technol 66(Compendex):3254–3262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.028 ↗
41. Vidal-Salle E, Nguyen QT, Charmetant A, Breard J, Maire E, Boisse P (2010) Use of numerical simulation of woven reinforcement forming at mesoscale: Influence of transverse compression on the global response. Int J Mater Form 3(SUPPL. 1):699–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0866-110.1007/s12289-010-0866-1 ↗
42. Potluri P, Sagar TV (2008) Compaction modelling of textile preforms for composite structures. Compos Struct 86:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.019 ↗
43. Bickerton S, Buntain MJ, Somashekar AA (2003) The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding preforms. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 34(5):431–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00088-510.1016/S1359-835X(03)00088-5 ↗
44. Somashekar AA, Bickerton S, Bhattacharyya D (2011) Compression deformation of a biaxial stitched glass fibre reinforcement: Visualisation and image analysis using X-ray micro-CT. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 42(2):140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.017 ↗
45. Somashekar AA, Bickerton S, Bhattacharyya D (2007) Exploring the non-elastic compression deformation of dry glass fibre reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 67(2):183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.032 ↗
46. Somashekar AA, Bickerton S, Bhattacharyya D (2012) Modelling the viscoelastic stress relaxation of glass fibre reinforcements under constant compaction strain during composites manufacturing. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 43(7):1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.004 ↗
47. Bickerton S, Buntain MJ (2007) Modeling forces generated within rigid liquid composite molding tools. Part B: Numerical analysis. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 38(7):1742–1754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.001 ↗
48. Mahadik Y, Brown KAR, Hallett SR (2010) Characterisation of 3D woven composite internal architecture and effect of compaction. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 41(7):872–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2010.02.019 ↗
49. Mahadik Y, Hallett SR (2010) Finite element modelling of tow geometry in 3D woven fabrics. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 41(9):1192–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.001 ↗
50. Huang W, Causse P, Brailovski V, Hu H, Trochu F (2019) Reconstruction of mesostructural material twin models of engineering textiles based on Micro-CT Aided Geometric Modeling. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 124:105481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10548110.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105481 ↗
51. M. A. Ali, R. Umer, and K. A. Khan (2020) CT Scan Generated Material Twins for Composites Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Springer10.1007/978-981-15-8021-5 ↗
52. Badel P, Vidal-Sallé E, Maire E, Boisse P (2008) Simulation and tomography analysis of textile composite reinforcement deformation at the mesoscopic scale. Compos Sci Technol 68(12):2433–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.03810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.038 ↗
53. Huang W, Causse P, Hu H, Belouettar S, Trochu F (2020) Transverse compaction of 2D glass woven fabrics based on material twins – Part II: Tow and fabric deformations. Compos Struct 237:111963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11196310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111963 ↗
54. Huang W, Causse P, Hu H, Belouettar S, Trochu F (2020) Transverse compaction of 2D glass woven fabrics based on material twins – Part I: Geometric analysis. Compos Struct 237:111929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11192910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111929 ↗
55. Nguyen QT et al (2013) Mesoscopic scale analyses of textile composite reinforcement compaction. Compos B: Eng 44(1):231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.028 ↗
56. Kelly PA, Umer R, Bickerton S "Compaction of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes." In 36th International SAMPE Technical Conference - Materials and Processing:Sailing into the Future, November 15, 2004 - November 18, 2004, San Diego, CA, United states, 2004, pp. 785–797: Soc. for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering.
57. Trochu F (2003) Krigeage en CAO et CFAO, Notes on the graduate course MEC6310 entitled 'Dual kriging and applications in Engineering Science'. École Polytechnique de Montréal