Calibration of the residual stresses with an active die during the ejection phase of cold extrusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The resulting tensile residual stresses on the surface of cold full-forward extruded parts are unfavorable for the fatigue life of these parts. The final stress state is determined by the combination of two process stages: forming and ejection. This is due to the fact that the workpiece undergoes a second plastic deformation after forming during the ejection from the die. So far, literature is focusing mainly on the identification of the parameters affecting the residual stresses during the first stage. In the present paper, the attention is drawn to the ejection phase during cold extrusion of workpieces made out of the austenitic stainless steel AISI 316 L. First of all, a system consisting of an active die is presented. This technology allows the control of the applied pre-stress on the die during the process. It is experimentally and numerically demonstrated that a significant shift of the residual stress state in the near-surface region can be achieved. Even compressive axial and tangential residual stresses can be induced in this area. Also the limits of this system are numerically investigated. It is observed that a different deformation mechanism occurs above a certain pre-stress level. Finally, an analytical model is created and observations are presented relatively to the mechanisms that influence the plastic deformation during ejection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Withers PJ (2007) Residual stress and its role in failure. Rep Prog Phys 70(12):2211–2264. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R0410.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R04 ↗
2. Macherauch E (1979) Neuere Untersuchungen zur Ausbildung und Auswirkung von Eigenspannungen in metallischen Werkstoffen. Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech. (10):97–11110.1002/mawe.19790100309 ↗
3. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress. Part 2 – Nature and origins. Mater Sci Technol 17(4):366–375. https://doi.org/10.1179/02670830110151008710.1179/026708301101510087 ↗
4. Volk W, Vogt S, Stahl J et al (2019) Introduction to residual stresses in production technology. Prod Eng Res Devel 13(2):119–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00881-810.1007/s11740-019-00881-8 ↗
5. Zhang H, Zhao X, Deng X et al (2014) Investigation of material flow during friction extrusion process. Int J Mech Sci 85:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.01110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.011 ↗
6. Landkammer P, Jobst A, Kiener C, Steinmann P, Merklein M (2019) Investigations on residual stress generation in full-forward-extrusion. Prod Eng 13(2):169–180
7. Tekkaya AE (1986) Ermittlung von Eigenspannungen in der Kaltmassivumformung. Springer-Verlag, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-82799-0 ↗
8. Solomon N, Solomon I (2010) Effect of die shape on the metal flow pattern during direct extrusion process. Revmetal 46(5):396–404. https://doi.org/10.3989/revmetalm.092810.3989/revmetalm.0928 ↗
9. Zucko M, Pöhlandt K, Pyzalla A, Reimers W, Kockelmann H (1997) Berechnung der Umformeigenspannungen beim Fließpressen und Vergleich mit experimentellen Ergebnissen. Mat.-wiss. u. Werkstofftech. (28):417–42310.1002/mawe.19970280907 ↗
10. Hoche H, Balser A, Oechsner M et al (2019) Enhancement of the residual stresses of cold full-forward extruded parts by application of an active counter punch. Materialwiss Werkst 50(6):669–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.20190005010.1002/mawe.201900050 ↗
11. Franceschi A, Groche P (2019) Verzugsarme Kaltmassivumformung: Entwicklung einer neuen Technologie zur Reduzierung der Eigenspannungen. wt Werkstattstechnik Online 109(10):740–74410.37544/1436-4980-2019-10-44 ↗
12. Narita S, Hayakawa K, Kubota Y et al (2017) Effect of hardening rule for spring back behavior of forging. Procedia Eng 207:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.75610.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.756 ↗
13. Jobst A, Kiener C, Merklein M (2019) Investigations on residual stress generation in extruded steel components. In: Wulfsberg J, Hintze W, Behrens BA (eds) Production at the leading edge of technology. Springer Vieweg, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60417-5_810.1007/978-3-662-60417-5_8 ↗
14. Groche P, Stahlmann J, Mueller C (2013) Mechanical conditions in bulk metal forming tribometers-Part two. Tribol Int (66): 345–35110.1016/j.triboint.2012.11.028 ↗
15. Franceschi A, Hoche H, Kaffenberger M, Oechsner M, Groche P (2019) Effects of a counter-punch system for cold full-forward extrusion. NUMIFORM 2019: The 13th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA
16. Eigenmann B, Macherauch E (1995) Röntgenographische Untersuchung von Spannungszuständen in Werkstoffen. Teil II. Matwiss. und Werktoffechn. (3):148–16010.1002/mawe.19950260310 ↗
17. Doege E, Behrens B-A (2010) Handbuch Umformtechnik. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04249-210.1007/978-3-642-04249-2 ↗