journal article·2021-05Open access

A preform deformation and resin flow coupled model including the cure kinetics and chemo-rheology for the VARTM process

Da Wu, Ragnar Larsson, Brina Blinzler

Abstract

Abstract The present paper deals with preform deformation and resin flow coupled to cure kinetics and chemo-rheology for the VARTM process. By monitoring the coupled resin infusion and curing steps through temperature control, our primary aim is to reduce the cycle time of the process. The analysis is based on the two-phase porous media flow and the preform deformation extended with cure kinetics and heat transfer. A novel feature is the consideration of temperature and preform deformation coupled to resin viscosity and permeability in the VARTM process. To tackle this problem, we extend the porous media framework with the heat transfer and chemical reaction, involving additional convection terms to describe the proper interactions with the resin flow. Shell kinematics is applied to thin-walled preforms, which significantly reduces the problem size. The proposed finite element discretized system of coupled models is solved in a staggered way to handle the partially saturated flow front under non-isothermal conditions efficiently. From the numerical example, we conclude that the cycle time of the VARTM infusion process can be shortened over 68% with the proper temperature control. Moreover, the proposed framework can be applied to optimize the processing parameters and check the compatibility of a resin system for a given infusion task.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Advani SG, Hsiao K-T (2012) Manufacturing Techniques for Polymer Matrix Composites (PMCs). Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands10.1533/9780857096258 ↗
2. Hsiao K-T, Mathur R, Advani SG, Gillespie JW, Fink BK (2000) A closed form solution for flow during the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process. J Manuf Sci Eng 122(3):463. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.128590710.1115/1.1285907 ↗
3. Wu D, Larsson R (2018) Homogenized free surface flow in porous media for wet-out processing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1(17). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.581210.1002/nme.5812 ↗
4. Simacek P, Advani SG (2003) A numerical model to predict fiber tow saturation during liquid composite molding. Compos Sci Technol 63(12):1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00155-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00155-6 ↗
5. Zhou F, Alms J, Advani SG (2008) A closed form solution for flow in dual scale fibrous porous media under constant injection pressure conditions. Compos Sci Technol 68(3):699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2007.09.010 ↗
6. Loudad R, Saouab A, Beauchene P, Agogue R, Desjoyeaux B (2017) Numerical modeling of vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding using multilayer approach. J Compos Mater 51(24):3441–3452. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831668714510.1177/0021998316687145 ↗
7. Chevalier L, Bruchon J, Moulin N, Liotier P-J, Drapier S (2018) Accounting for local capillary effects in two-phase flows with relaxed surface tension formulation in enriched finite elements. Compt Rend Mécan 346(8):617–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2018.06.00810.1016/j.crme.2018.06.008 ↗
8. Wu D, Larsson R (2019) A shell model for resin flow and preform deformation in thin-walled composite manufacturing processes. Int J Mater Form. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01517-z10.1007/s12289-019-01517-z ↗
9. Wu D, Larsson R, Rouhi MS (2019) Modeling and experimental validation of the VARTM process for thin-Walled preforms. Polymers 11(12):2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1112200310.3390/polym11122003 ↗
10. Kamal MR, Sourour S (1973) Kinetics and thermal characterization of thermoset cure. Polym Eng Sci 13(1):59–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76013011010.1002/pen.760130110 ↗
11. Bogetti TA, Gillespie JW (1992) Process-Induced stress and deformation in thick-Section thermoset composite laminates. J Compos Mater 26(5):626–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983920260050210.1177/002199839202600502 ↗
12. Stanko M, Stommel M (2018) Kinetic prediction of fast curing polyurethane resins by model-Free isoconversional methods. Polymers 10(7):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1007069810.3390/polym10070698 ↗
13. Qi T, Pinter G, Antretter T, Krivec T, Fuchs P (2018) Model free kinetics coupled with finite element method for curing simulation of thermosetting epoxy resins. J Appl Polym Sci 135(27):46408. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4640810.1002/app.46408 ↗
14. Ruiz E, Trochu F (2005) Numerical analysis of cure temperature and internal stresses in thin and thick RTM parts. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 36(6):806–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.021 ↗
15. Muc A, Romanowicz P, Chwał M (2019) Description of the Resin Curing process—Formulation and Optimization. Polymers 11(1):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1101012710.3390/polym11010127 ↗
16. Benavente M, Marcin L, Courtois A, Lévesque M, Ruiz E (2018) Numerical analysis of viscoelastic process-induced residual distortions during manufacturing and post-curing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 107:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.005 ↗
17. Maji P, Neogi S (2018) Development of kinetics sub-model of cyanate ester-based prepregs for autoclave molding process simulation. High Temper Mater Process 37(8):769–776. https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2017-003910.1515/htmp-2017-0039 ↗
18. Dong A, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Yu Q (2018) Cure cycle optimization of rapidly cured out-Of-Autoclave composites. Materials 11(3):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1103042110.3390/ma11030421 ↗
19. Garschke C, Parlevliet PP, Weimer C, Fox BL (2013) Cure kinetics and viscosity modelling of a high-performance epoxy resin film. Polym Test 32 (1):150–157. ISSN 0142-9418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.09.01110.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.09.011 ↗
20. Guo Z-S, Du S, Zhang B (2005) Temperature field of thick thermoset composite laminates during cure process. Compos Sci Technol 65(3):517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.015 ↗
21. Hwang S-S, Park SY, Kwon G-C, Choi WJ (2018) Cure kinetics and viscosity modeling for the optimization of cure cycles in a vacuum-bag-only prepreg process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 99 (9):2743–2753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2467-y10.1007/s00170-018-2467-y ↗
22. Park SY, Choi CH, Choi WJ, Hwang SS (2019) A Comparison of the Properties of Carbon Fiber Epoxy Composites Produced by Non-autoclave with Vacuum Bag Only Prepreg and Autoclave Process. Appl Compos Mater 26(1):187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9688-y10.1007/s10443-018-9688-y ↗
23. Castro JM, Macosko CW (1982) Studies of mold filling and curing in the reaction injection molding process. AIChE J 28(2):250–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69028021310.1002/aic.690280213 ↗
24. Henne M, Breyer C, Niedermeier M, Ermanni P (2004) A new kinetic and viscosity model for liquid composite molding simulations in an industrial environment. Polym Compos 25(3):255–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2002010.1002/pc.20020 ↗
25. He W, He L, Ma Z, Yanlia G (2016) The kinetic and viscosity analysis of glycidyl azide polymer spherical propellant. J Therm Anal Calorim 124(2):943–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-5225-510.1007/s10973-015-5225-5 ↗
26. Li H, Zhang B (2016) Improved models of viscosity and relaxation modulus for epoxy resin during cure. Polym Eng Sci 56(6):617–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2428610.1002/pen.24286 ↗
27. Zhang T, Zhao Y, Zhang B (2018) A method based on the time–temperature superposition principle to predict pressurization time in compression molding. J Appl Polym Sci 135(36):46664. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4666410.1002/app.46664 ↗
28. Karkanas PI, Partridge IV (2000) Cure modeling and monitoring of epoxy/amine resin systems. II. Network formation and chemoviscosity modeling. J Appl Polym Sci 77(10):2178–2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/10.1002/1097-4628(20000906)77:10<2178::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-010.1002/1097-4628(20000906)77:10<2178::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
29. Raghu K, Pandiyan R, Neogi S (2012) Viscosity modeling of a medium reactive unsaturated polyester resin used for liquid composite molding process. J Appl Polym Sci 125(2):1400–1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3544710.1002/app.35447 ↗
30. Geissberger R, Maldonado J, Bahamonde N, Keller A, Dransfeld C, Masania K (2017) Rheological modelling of thermoset composite processing. Compos Part B Eng 124:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.040 ↗
31. Celle P, Drapier S, Bergheau J-M (2008) Numerical modelling of liquid infusion into fibrous media undergoing compaction. Eur J Mech- A/Solids 27(4):647–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.11.00210.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.11.002 ↗
32. Keller A, Dransfeld C, Masania K (November 2018) Flow and heat transfer during compression resin transfer moulding of highly reactive epoxies. Compos Part B Eng 153:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.04110.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.041 ↗
33. Shi F, Dong X (2011) 3d numerical simulation of filling and curing processes in non-isothermal RTM process cycle. Finite Elem Anal Des 47(7):764–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.02.00710.1016/j.finel.2011.02.007 ↗
34. Grujicic M, Chittajallu KM, Walsh Shawn (2005) Non-isothermal preform infiltration during the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. Appl Surf Sci 245(1):51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.12310.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.123 ↗
35. Ma L, Athreya SR, Mehta R, Barpanda D, Shafi A (2017) Numerical modeling and experimental validation of nonisothermal resin infusion and cure processes in large composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168441769167310.1177/0731684417691673 ↗
36. Fredi G, Dorigato A, Pegoretti A Novel reactive thermoplastic resin as a matrix for laminates containing phase change microcapsules 40(9):3711–3724. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2523310.1002/pc.25233 ↗
37. Rudd CD, Long AC, Kendall KN, Mangin C (1997) Liquid Moulding Technologies: Resin Transfer Moulding, Structural Reaction Injection Moulding and Related Processing Techniques. Elsevier. ISBN 978-1-84569-544-610.1533/9781845695446.1 ↗
38. Burdine NT (1953) Relative permeability calculations from pore size distribution data. J Pet Technol 5(03):71–78. https://doi.org/10.2118/225-G10.2118/225-G ↗
39. Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media and their relation to drainage design. Trans ASAE 7(1):0026–0028. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.4068410.13031/2013.40684 ↗
40. Toll S (1998) Packing mechanics of fiber reinforcements. Polym Eng Sci 38(8):1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1030410.1002/pen.10304 ↗
41. Tucker CL, Dessenberger RB (1994) Govening equations for flow and heat transfer in stationary fiber beds. In: S.G. Advani (ed) Flow and rheology in polymer composites manufacturing. Elsevier, Science B.V, Amsterdam, p 257
42. Tan H, Pillai KM (2010) Numerical simulation of reactive flow in liquid composite molding using flux-corrected transport (FCT) based finite element/control volume (FE/CV) method. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 53 (9):2256–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.00310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.003 ↗
43. Staffan Lundström T (1997) Measurement of void collapse during resin transfer moulding. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 28(3):201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00109-110.1016/S1359-835X(96)00109-1 ↗
44. Han N-W, Bhakta J, Carbonell RG (1985) Longitudinal and lateral dispersion in packed beds: Effect of column length and particle size distribution. AIChE J 31(2):277–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69031021510.1002/aic.690310215 ↗
45. Donea J, Huerta A (2003) Finite element methods for flow problems. Wiley, New York10.1002/0470013826 ↗
46. Lin R, Lee LJ, Liou M (1991) Non-isothermal mold filling and curing simulation in thin cavities with preplaced fiber mats. Int Polym Process 6(4):356–36910.3139/217.910356 ↗
47. Advani SG, Murat Sozer E (2010) Process modeling in composites manufacturing. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/b13142 ↗