An advanced resin reaction modeling using data-driven and digital twin techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
Elium® resin is nowadays actively investigated to leverage its recycling ability. Thus, multiple polymerization modeling are developed and used. In this work, we investigate the polymerization of Elium®/Carbon fiber composite in a cylindrical deposition, followed by an in-oven heating. The model parameters are optimized using an active-set algorithm to match the experimental heating profiles. Moreover, the simulation efforts are coupled to an artificial intelligence modeling of the discrepancies. For instance, a surrogate model using convolution recurrent neural network is trained to reproduce the error of the simulation. Later, a digital twin of the process is built by coupling the simulation and the machine learning algorithm. The obtained results show a good match of the experimental results even on the testing sets, never used during the training of the surrogate model. Finally, the digital twin results are post-processes to investigate the resin polymerization through the thickness of the part.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Kumar HP, Xavior MA (2021) Composite materials production for automobile applications. In: Brabazon D (ed) Encyclopedia of materials: composites. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11894-6https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11894-6 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128035818118946https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128035818118946 . Elsevier, Oxford, pp 640–65110.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11894-6 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11894-6 ↗
2. Perez M, Barasinski A, Courtemanche B, Ghnatios C, Chinesta F (2018) Sensitivity thermal analysis in the laser assisted tape-placement process. Aims Mater Sci 5(6):1053–1072. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1053https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.6.105310.3934/matersci.2018.6.1053 ↗
3. Stewart R (2011) Thermoplastic composites—recyclable and fast to process. Reinf Plast 55 (3):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70073-Xhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70073-X. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003436171170073Xhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003436171170073X10.1016/S0034-3617(11)70073-X ↗
4. Bernatas R, Dagreou S, Despax-Ferreres A, Barasinski A (2021) Recycling of fiber reinforced composites with a focus on thermoplastic composites. Clean Eng Technol 5:10027210.1016/j.clet.2021.100272 ↗
5. Jones R (1999) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn.Taylor and Francis group
6. Bur N, Joyot P, Ghnatios C, Villon P, Cueto E, Chinesta F (2016) On the use of model order reduction for simulating automated fibre placement processes. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 3:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-016-0056-x10.1186/s40323-016-0056-x ↗
7. Strau S, Wilhelm F (2020) Development of a flexible injection and impregnation chamber for pultrusion of high reactive resins. Procedia Manuf 47:956–961. 23rd International conference on material forming. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.294https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.294. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978920313603https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235197892031360310.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.294 ↗
8. Ghnatios C, Simacek P, Chinesta F, Advani S (2020) A non-local void dynamics modeling and simulation using the proper generalized decomposition. Int J Mater Form 13:533–54610.1007/s12289-019-01490-7 ↗
9. Castéran F, Ibanez R, Argerich C, Delage K, Chinesta F, Cassagnau P (2020) Application of machine learning tools for the improvement of reactive extrusion simulation. Macromol Mater Eng 12:200037510.1002/mame.202000375 ↗
10. Adel A, Salah K (2016) Model order reduction using artificial neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE International conference on electronics, circuits and systems (ICECS). IEEE, pp 89–9210.1109/ICECS.2016.7841139 ↗
11. de Weg BV, Greve L, Andres M, Eller T, Rosic B (2021) Neural network-based surrogate model for a bifurcating structural fracture response. Eng Fract Mech 241:10742410.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107424 ↗
12. Hage R -M, Hage I, Ghnatios C, Jawahir I, Hamade R (2019) Optimized tabu search estimation of wear characteristics and cutting forces in compact core drilling of basalt rock using pcd tool inserts. Comput Ind Eng 136(10):477–49310.1016/j.cie.2019.07.049 ↗
13. Ghnatios C, Hage R -M, Hage I (2019) An efficient tabu-search optimized regression for data-driven modeling. C R Mec 347(11):806–81610.1016/j.crme.2019.11.006 ↗
14. Xu R, Wang N, Zhang D Solution of diffusivity equations with local sources/sinks and surrogate modeling using weak form theory-guided neural network. Adv Water Resour. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.10394110.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103941 ↗
15. Ibanez R, Casteran F, Argerich C, Ghnatios C, Hascoet N, Ammar A, Cassagnau P, Chinesta F (2020) On the data-driven modeling of reactive extrusion. Fluids 94(5):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5020094https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids502009410.3390/fluids5020094 10.3390/fluids5020094 ↗
16. González D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2019) Thermodynamically consistent data-driven computational mechanics. Contin Mech Thermodyn 31:239–25310.1007/s00161-018-0677-z ↗
17. Ghnatios C, Alfaro I, Gonzalez D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2019) Data-driven generic modeling of poroviscoelastic materials. Entropy 21(12):116510.3390/e21121165 ↗
18. Gonzalez D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2019) Thermodynamically consistent data-driven computational mechanics. Contin Mech Thermodyn 31(1):239–25310.1007/s00161-018-0677-z ↗
19. Soize C (2000) A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics. Probabilistic Eng Mech 15(3):277–29410.1016/S0266-8920(99)00028-4 ↗
20. Soize C, Farhat C (2016) A nonparametric probabilistic approach for quantifying uncertainties in low- and high-dimensional nonlinear models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 109:837–888. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5312https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.531210.1002/nme.5312 ↗
21. Farhat C, Bos A, Avery P, Soize C (2017) Modeling and quantification of model-form uncertainties in eigenvalue computations using a stochastic reduced model. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 56(3):1–22
22. Soize C, Farhat C (2019) Probabilistic learning for modeling and quantifying model-form uncertainties in nonlinear computational mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 117:819–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.598010.1002/nme.5980 ↗
23. Chinesta F, Cueto E, Abisset-Chavan E, Duval J -L, Khaldi F (2020) Virtual, digital and hybrid twins: a new paradigm in data-based engineering and engineered data. Arch Comput Methods Eng 27:105–13410.1007/s11831-018-9301-4 ↗
24. Ghnatios C A hybrid modeling combining the proper generalized decomposition (pgd) approach to data-driven model learners, with application to non-linear biphasic materials. C R Méc. In Press
25. Ghnatios C, Barasinski A (2021) A nonparametric probabilistic method to enhance pgd solutions with data-driven approach, application to the automated tape placement process. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 8(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-021-00205-510.1186/s40323-021-00205-5 ↗
26. Gayot S, Bailly C, Pardoen T, Gérard P, Loock FV (2020) Processing maps based on polymerization modelling of thick methacrylic laminates. Mater Des 196:10917010.1016/j.matdes.2020.109170 ↗
27. Askeland D, Fulay P, Wright W (2020) The science and engineering of materials, 6th edn. Cengage Learning
28. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical optimization. Springer10.1007/b98874 ↗
29. Allery C, Beghein C, Hamdouni A (2005) Applying proper orthogonal decomposition to the computation of particle dispersion in a two-dimensional ventilated cavity. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 10:907–92010.1016/j.cnsns.2004.05.005 ↗
30. Liberge E, Hamdouni A (2010) Reduced order modelling method via proper orthogonal decomposition (pod) for flow arround and oscillating cylinder. J Fluids Struct 26:292–31110.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.10.006 ↗
31. Ryckelynck D (2005) A priori hyper-reduction method: an adaptive approach. J Comput Phys 202:346–36610.1016/j.jcp.2004.07.015 ↗
32. Bernardi C, Maday Y (1997) Spectral methods. In: Handbook of numerical analysis, vol 5, pp 209–48510.1016/S1570-8659(97)80003-8 ↗
33. Reddy J (2006) An introduction to the finite element method, 3rd edn. Mc Graw Hill
34. Klambauer G, Unterthiner T, Mayr A (2017) Self-normalizing neural networks. In: 31st Conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, pp 1–102