A novel experimental approach in determining forming limit diagrams by considering the effect of normal pressure
Source abstract
Abstract
Forming limit diagram (FLD) is a useful tool for predicting failure in sheet metal forming processes. Many experimental tests, such as Nakazima test, have been developed to determine the FLDs experimentally. In all these methods the FLDs are determined without considering the effect of normal stress. This paper presents a novel experimental approach based on the Nakazima method to determine the forming limit diagrams under various normal pressures. Both necking and fracture forming limit curves of St12 low carbon steel were obtained experimentally with no, and under 50 MPa compressive normal pressures. The fracture forming limit curves under different normal pressures between 0 and 250 MPa were predicted numerically using ABAQUS/Explicit commercial finite element code and applying VUSDFLD subroutine in order to determine fracture. For this purpose, six phenomenological ductile failure criteria, including Rice-Tracey, Oyane-Sato, Ko-Huh, DF2012, DF2014, and DF2015, were implemented. These criteria were calibrated using the six tests of in-plane shear, uniaxial tensile, circle hole, notched tension, plane stress, and Nakazima stretching. The results from the proposed methods and those from numerical simulations have been compared and the efficiency of each ductile fracture criterion was demonstrated. All the experimental and numerical results indicated that a greater normal stress causes the forming limit curve surface to rise.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Keeler SP (1965) Determination of forming limits in automotive stampings. SAE Technical Paper10.4271/650535 ↗
2. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. SAE technical paper10.4271/680093 ↗
3. Brozzo P, Deluca B, Rendina R (1972) A new method for the prediction of formability in metal sheet, sheet metal forming and formability. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of the IDDRG
4. Olsen T (1920) Machines for ductility testing. Proc Am Soc Mater 20(1920):398-40310.25291/VR/1920-VLR-398 ↗
5. Marciniak Z (1965) Stability of plastic shells under tension with kinematic boundary conditions(Stability of plastic shell under tension). Archiwum Mechaniki Stosowanej 17(4):577–592
6. Nakazima K, Kikuma T (1967) Forming limits under biaxial stretching of sheet metals. Testu-to Hagane 53:455–45810.2355/tetsutohagane1955.53.10_S455 ↗
7. Oh S-T et al (2006) Prediction of forming limit in hydro-mechanical deep drawing of steel sheets using ductile fracture criterion. Met Mater Int 12(2):121–12910.1007/BF03027467 ↗
8. Lang L et al (2015) Investigation on the effect of through thickness normal stress on forming limit at elevated temperature by using modified M-K model. Int J Mater Form 8(2):211–22810.1007/s12289-014-1161-3 ↗
9. Gotoh M, Chung T, Iwata N (1995) Effect of out-of-plane stress on the forming limit strain of sheet metals. JSME Int J Ser A Mech Mater Eng 38(1):123–132
10. FUCHS F (1966) Hydrostatic pressure--its role in metal forming. Mech Eng 88(4):34–40
11. Smith LM, Ganeshmurthy S, Alladi K (2003) Double-sided high-pressure tubular hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 142(3):599–60810.1016/S0924-0136(02)01041-5 ↗
12. Banabic D, Soare S (2008) On the effect of the normal pressure upon the forming limit strains. In: Proceedings Numisheet
13. Assempour A, Nejadkhaki HK, Hashemi R (2010) Forming limit diagrams with the existence of through-thickness normal stress. Comput Mater Sci 48(3):504–50810.1016/j.commatsci.2010.02.013 ↗
14. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2012) Influence of out-of-plane compression stress on limit strains in sheet metals. Int J Mater Form 5(3):213–22610.1007/s12289-011-1044-9 ↗
15. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2014) The effect of normal stress on the formability of sheet metals under non-proportional loading. Int J Mech Sci 82:131–13910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.03.015 ↗
16. Cui X-L, Wang X-S, Yuan S-J (2014) Deformation analysis of double-sided tube hydroforming in square-section die. J Mater Process Technol 214(7):1341–135110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.005 ↗
17. Fatemi A, Mollaei B, Dariani (2015) Forming limit prediction of anisotropic material subjected to normal and through thickness shear stresses using a modified M–K model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(9):1497–150910.1007/s00170-015-7001-x ↗
18. Habibi N, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi H-R (2015) An investigation into the fracture mechanisms of twinning-induced-plasticity steel sheets under various strain paths. J Mater Process Technol 224:102–11610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.04.014 ↗
19. Testing ASF and Materials (1994) Metals test methods and analytical procedures. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
20. Hosford WF, Caddell RM (2011) Metal forming: mechanics and metallurgy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511976940 ↗
21. Brozzo P, Deluca B, Rendina R (1972) A new method for the prediction of formability limits in metal sheets. In: Proc. 7th biennal Conf. IDDR
22. Olsen TY (1920) Machines for ductility testing. Proceeding of the American Society of Materials 20:398–403
23. Hecker SS (1972) A simple forming-limit curve technique and results on aluminum alloys. In: Int. Deep Drawing Res. Group, 7th Biennial Congress, Amsterdam, 35
24. Marciniak Z (1965) Stability of plastic shells under tension with kinematic boundary conditions(Stability of plastic shell under tension). Archiwum Mechaniki Stosowanej 17(4):577–592
25. Nakazima K, Kikuma T (1967) Forming limits under biaxial stretching of sheet metals. Testu-to Hagane 53:455–45810.2355/tetsutohagane1955.53.10_S455 ↗
26. Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka KJYTR (1968) Study on the formability of steel sheets. SEPT. 264
27. Lou Y, Huh H, Lim S, Pack K (2012) New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 49(25):3605–361510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016 ↗
28. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2015) A comparative study of three groups of ductile fracture loci in the 3D space. Eng Fract Mech 135:147–16710.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.12.023 ↗
29. Lou Y, H.J.A.M.S S, Huh (2013) Evaluation of ductile fracture criteria in a general three-dimensional stress state considering the stress triaxiality and the lode parameter. 26(6):642–658610.1016/S0894-9166(14)60008-2 ↗
30. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields∗. J Mech Phys Solids 17(3):201–21710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
31. Oyane M, Sato T, Okimoto K, Shima S (1980) Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Work Technol 4(1):65–8110.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-6 ↗
32. Ko YK., Lee JS, Huh H, Kim HK, Park SH (2007) Prediction of fracture in hub-hole expanding process using a new ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol 187:358–36210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.071 ↗
33. Lou Y, Yoon JW, Huh H (2014) Modeling of shear ductile fracture considering a changeable cut-off value for stress triaxiality. Int J Plast 54:56–8010.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.006 ↗
34. Lou Y et al (2017) Modeling of ductile fracture from shear to balanced biaxial tension for sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 112:169–18410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.034 ↗
35. Systèmes D (2014) Abaqus user subroutines reference guide, Version 6.14. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence