Investigation of an inverse thermal injection mould design methodology in dependence of the part geometry
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The production of injection moulded components with low shrinkage and warpage is a constant challenge for manufacturers. The thermal design of the injection mould plays an important role for the achievable quality, especially the placement of the cooling channels. This design is usually based on empirical knowledge of the mould designers. The construction is supported iteratively by injection moulding simulations. In the case of thick-walled plastic optics with big wall thickness jumps, the shrinkage is compensated by injection compression moulding. In this process, the thin-walled areas freeze earlier and the necessary compression pressure introduces stresses into these areas which reduces the optical performance. An adapted cooling channel design can reduce these problems. At the IKV, Institute for Plastics Processing in Industry and Crafts at the RWTH Aachen University, a methodology was developed which inversely calculates the cooling requirement of the moulded part A demand-oriented cooling channel system is derived based on the computed results. The aim of the research projects is to minimise displacement and internal stresses by temperature control of the moulded parts according to the demand. In this paper, the methodology is applied to three different geometries, representing three classical parts for the injection moulding process. Three different quality areas in the mould for the inverse optimisation are defined and investigated. For each geometry the cooling channel designs are then validated in injection moulding simulations based on the results from the thermal optimisation. It can be shown that for different component geometries and thicknesses, different quality areas are advantageous and decrease the maximum warpage of the parts. For thin-walled ribbed components, a 2D approach leads to a 15% smaller displacement, for components with wall thickness jumps, all investigated quality ranges show no differences in displacement, but a surface in the middle of the part is preferred due to a 3 °C lower standard deviation of the temperature distribution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Pötsch G, Michaeli W (2008) Injection molding. An introduction. Hanser, Munich
2. Hopmann C, Menges G, Michaeli W, Mohren P (2018) Spritzgießwerkzeuge. Auslegung, Bau, Anwendung. Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich10.3139/9783446453906 ↗
3. Malloy RA (2011) Plastic part design for injection molding. An introduction. Hanser, Cincinnati, Ohio10.3139/9783446433748.fm ↗
4. Frekers V (2019) Improved part properties via virtual DoE. SIGMA Engineering GmbH. https://www.sigmasoft.de/en/press/pressreleases/improved-part-properties-via-virtual-doe/. Accessed 06 March 2020
5. NN (2017) Process Optimization analysis (Concept). https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/moldflow-insight/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2018/ENU/MoldflowInsight/files/GUID-5EC36B17-F7B4-4083-8872-E86AA04BA849-htm.html. Accessed 06 March 2020
6. Lin CM, Wang CK (2013) Processing optimization of optical Lens in the injection molding. Adv Mater Res 813:161–164. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.813.16110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.813.161 ↗
7. Chung C-Y (2019) Integrated optimum layout of conformal cooling channels and optimal injection molding process parameters for optical lenses. Appl Sci 9(20):4341. https://doi.org/10.3390/app920434110.3390/app9204341 ↗
8. Li CG, Wu Y (2010) Evolutionary Optimization of Plastic Injection Mould Cooling System Layout Design. International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application:693–696. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDEA.2010.30510.1109/ISDEA.2010.305 ↗
9. Wang Y, Yu K-M, Wang CCL, Zhang Y (2011) Automatic design of conformal cooling circuits for rapid tooling. Comput Aided Des 43(8):1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.04.01110.1016/j.cad.2011.04.011 ↗
10. Zhang Y, Hou B, Wang Q, Li Y, Huang Z (2018) Automatic design of conformal cooling channels in injection molding tooling. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 307:12025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/307/1/01202510.1088/1757-899X/307/1/012025 ↗
11. Jahan SA, Wu T, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Tovar A, Elmounayri H (2017) Thermo-mechanical design optimization of conformal cooling channels using Design of Experiments Approach. Procedia Manufacturing 10:898–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.07810.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.078 ↗
12. Rhee B-O, Park C-S, Chang H-K, Jung H-W, Lee Y-J (2010) Automatic generation of optimum cooling circuit for large injection molded parts. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 11(3):439–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-010-0050-z10.1007/s12541-010-0050-z ↗
13. Hopmann C, Nikoleizig P (2018) Inverse thermal mold design for injection molds. Int J Mater Form 11(1):113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1334-310.1007/s12289-016-1334-3 ↗
14. Agazzi A, Sobotka V, LeGoff R, Jarny Y (2013) Optimal cooling design in injection moulding process – a new approach based on morphological surfaces. Appl Therm Eng 52(1):170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.01910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.019 ↗
15. Agazzi A, Sobotka V, Le Goff R, Garcia D, Jarny Y (2010) A methodology for the Design of Effective Cooling System in injection Moulding. Int J Mater Form 3(S1):13–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0695-210.1007/s12289-010-0695-2 ↗
16. Agazzi A, Sobotka V, Le Goff R, Jarny Y (2013) Uniform cooling and part Warpage reduction in injection molding thanks to the Design of an Effective Cooling System. Key Eng Mater 554-557:1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.161110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.1611 ↗
17. Agazzi A; Garcia D; Jarny Y; Le Goff R; Sobotka V (2018) Method for forming channels in a tool and computer program product that performs such a method. Patentn°: WO 2012/168669. B22D 17/20 (2006.01)
18. Nikoleizig P (2017) Inverse thermische Spritzgießwerkzeugauslegung auf basis des lokalen Kühlbedarfs. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University
19. Hopmann C, Theunissen M, Schneppe T, Schmitz M (2019) Automatic cooling channel design for injection moulds. AIP Conference Proceeding 2139:30004. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.512165710.1063/1.5121657 ↗
20. Hopmann C, Fischer T, Hohlweck T (2019) Simulative and experimental validation of an inversed cooling channel design for injection molds. SPE ANTEC 2019 conference proceedings. Curran associates, Inc. red hook, NY, Vol. 1, pp 339-344
21. Chen S-C, Turng L-S, Ameli A (2019) Advanced injection molding technologies. Hanser, Cincinnati, Ohio10.3139/9781569906040 ↗
22. Menges G et al (2014) Menges Werkstoffkunde Kunststoffe. Hanser, München