Forming limit studies on different thickness aluminium 6xxx series alloys used in automotive applications
Source abstract
Abstract
During sheet metal forming, one of the major measures of success for the material is to show forming strains below the safe limit of a forming limit curve (FLC) and to show minimum thinning in critical areas in the forming die. To understand this behaviour, tensile tests and 7 point FLC tests were conducted to evaluate the forming limit of the alloy using Instron and Erichsen machines respectively. This paper presents the outcome of investigations into the forming characteristics of different thickness of aluminium 6xxx series alloys with T4 and T6 temper and compares them to results obtained from previously published investigations. Metallographic analyses were also conducted on these alloys in order to correlate the microstructure with the observed forming behaviour. The results presented indicate how both material thickness and tempering treatment affect the forming limit of the material.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Stanton M., Bhattacharya R., Dargue I., and Williams G. The production and examination of u-profiles for assessing springback. In Seventh International Conference on Manufacturing Research, pages 371–375, 2009.
2. Yu Z., Lin Z., Zhao Y.: Evaluation of fracture limit in automotive aluminium alloy sheet forming. Materials and Design, 28, 203–207, 2007.10.1016/j.matdes.2005.04.010 ↗
3. Kohara S: Forming-limit curves of aluminium and aluminium alloy sheets and effects of strain paths on the curves. J. Mat. Proc. Technol, 38, 723–735, 199310.1016/0924-0136(93)90046-9 ↗
4. Banabic D., Cazacu O., Paraianu L., and Jurco P. Recent developments in the formability of Aluminum alloys. In NUMISHEET 2005, 466–471, 2005.10.1063/1.2011264 ↗
5. Polmear I: Light alloys from traditional alloys to nanocrystals. Elsevier Oxford UK, 2006.
6. Banabic D., Vos M.: Increasing the Robustness of the Sheet Metal Forming Simulation by the Prediction of the Forming Limit Band CIRP Annals, 56, 249–252, 2007.10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.058 ↗
7. Barlat F., Vasudevan A. K.: Influence of precipitate microstructure on flow and forming properties of an aluminum alloy sheet. Acta Metall., 39, 391–400, 1991.10.1016/0956-7151(91)90318-U ↗
8. Kleemola H. J., Kumpulainen J. O.: Factors influencing the forming limit diagram: part ii influence of sheet thickness. J. Mech. Working Technol., 3, 303–311, 1980.10.1016/0378-3804(80)90049-2 ↗
9. Banabic D.: Anisotropy and formability of AA5182-O aluminium alloy sheets, CIRP Annals, 53, 219–222, 2004.10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60683-0 ↗
10. Graf A., Hosford W., The influence of strain-path changes on forming limit diagrams of a1 6111 T4, 94, 897–910, 1994.10.1016/0020-7403(94)90053-1 ↗
11. Chow C. L., Yu L. G., Tai W. H., Demeri M. Y.: Prediction of forming limit diagrams for AL6111-T4 under non-proportional loading. 43, 471–486, 2001.10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00123-X ↗
12. Bhattacharya R., Stanton M., Dargue I., and Williams G.. Materials characterization of Aluminium alloys for use in automotive structures. In Seventh International Conference on Manufacturing Research, pages 366–370, 2009.
13. Stachowicz F.: “Formability of Aluminium alloy sheets”, J. Mechanical Working Technology, 13, 229–235, 1986.10.1016/0378-3804(86)90068-9 ↗
14. Haberfield A. B., Kumpulainen J. O.: Laboratory determined forming limit diagram, Sheet Met. Ind., 6, 400–411, 1973.