Experimental characterization and analysis of fiber orientations in hemispherical thermostamping for unidirectional thermoplastic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Nowadays there is seldom literature concerning in-plane fiber orientation variations in the thickness direction for composites after thermostamping. In present work, cross-section microscopy observations were carried out to characterize fiber orientations at different positions and in different plies for thermoformed unidirectional reinforced thermoplastic composite hemispheres. It is found that there is no fiber angle change in the thickness direction near the vertex; fiber angles of medial plies are lower than that of lateral plies in the middle region; fiber angles decrease from the outside ply to the inside ply on the hemisphere edge. Thermostamping simulations were performed and a constitutive model was applied with fiber reorientations considered. It is shown that embedding fiber reorientations and non-uniform temperature field of the blank into the constitutive model has an important influence on fiber orientations in simulation. The average condition of fiber orientations could be reasonably forecasted at different positions. Simulation shows agreements with experiments on distribution trends of in-plane fiber orientation variations through the thickness near the vertex and on the hemisphere edge. However, simulation failed to describe a distribution feature of in-plane fiber orientation variation through the thickness: fiber angles in medial plies are smaller than that in lateral plies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang P, Hamila N, Boisse P (2013) Thermoforming simulation of multilayer composites with continuous fibres and thermoplastic matrix. Compos Part B-Eng 52:127–13610.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.045 ↗
2. Hou M (1996) Stamp forming of fabric-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Polym Compos 17:596–60310.1002/pc.10649 ↗
3. Haanappel SP, Thije RHWT, Sachs U, Rietman B, Akkerman R (2014) Formability analyses of uni-directional and textile reinforced thermoplastics. Compos Part A-Appl S 56:80–9210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.009 ↗
4. Sadighi M, Rabizadeh E (2008) Effects of laminate sequencing on thermoforming of thermoplastic matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 201:725–73010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.239 ↗
5. Machado M, Fischlschweiger M, Major Z (2016) A rate-dependent non-orthogonal constitutive model for describing shear behaviour of woven reinforced thermoplastic composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 80:194–20310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.028 ↗
6. Lomov SV, Ivanov DS (2008) Full-field strain measurements for validation of meso-FE analysis of textile composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 39:1218–123110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.011 ↗
7. Pazmino J, Carvelli V, Lomov SV, Mieghem BV, Lava P (2014) 3D digital image correlation measurements during shaping of a non-crimp 3D orthogonal woven E-glass reinforcement. Int J Mater Form 7:439–44610.1007/s12289-013-1139-6 ↗
8. Vanclooster K, Lomov SV, Willems A, Verpoest I (2007) Measurement of local deformations on thermoformed composite parts under different process conditions. International Esaform Conference on Material Forming, American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 907:1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.272965410.1063/1.2729654 ↗
9. Badel P, Vidal-Sallé E, Maire E, Boisse P (2009) Simulation and tomography analysis of textile composite reinforcement deformation at the mesoscopic scale. Int J Mater Form 2:189–19210.1007/s12289-009-0572-z ↗
10. Pazmino J, Carvelli V, Lomov SV (2014) Micro-CT analysis of the internal deformed geometry of a non-crimp 3D orthogonal weave E-glass composite reinforcement. Compos Part B-Eng 65:147–15710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.024 ↗
11. Naouar N, Vidal-Sallé E, Schneider J, Maire E, Boisse P (2014) Meso-scale FE analyses of textile composite reinforcement deformation based on X-ray computed tomography. Compos Struct 116:165–17610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.04.026 ↗
12. Hofstee J, Boer HD (2000) Elastic stiffness analysis of a thermoformed plain-weave fabric composite. Part I: geometry. Compos Sci Technol 60:1041–105310.1016/S0266-3538(00)00009-9 ↗
13. Chang SH, Sutcliffe MPF, Sharma SB (2004) Microscopic investigation of tow geometry changes in a woven prepreg material during draping and consolidation. Compos Sci Technol 64:1701–170710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.004 ↗
14. Abbassi F, Elfaleh I, Mistou S, Zghal A, Fazzini M, Djilali T (2011) Experimental and numerical investigations of a thermoplastic composite (carbon/PPS) thermoforming. Struct Control Hlth 18:769–78010.1002/stc.491 ↗
15. Dörr D, Joppich T, Schirmaier F, Mosthaf T, Kärger L, Henning F (2016) A method for validation of finite element forming simulation on basis of a pointwise comparison of distance and curvature. International Esaform Conference on Material Forming. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings 1769:515–537. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496356710.1063/1.4963567 ↗
16. Cao J, Xue P, Peng XQ, Krishnan N (2003) An approach in modeling the temperature effect in thermo-stamping of woven composites. Compos Struct 61:413–42010.1016/S0263-8223(03)00052-7 ↗
17. Harrison P, Gomes R, Curado-Correia N (2013) Press forming a 0/90 cross-ply advanced thermoplastic composite using the double-dome benchmark geometry. Compos Part A-Appl S 54:56–6910.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.014 ↗
18. Harrison P, Yu WR, Long AC (2011) Rate dependent modelling of the forming behavior of viscous textile composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 42:1719–172610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.026 ↗
19. Hübner M, Rocher JE, Allaoui S, Hivet G, Gereke T, Cherif C (2016) Simulation-based investigations on the drape behavior of 3D woven fabrics made of commingled yarns. Int J Mater Form 9:591–59910.1007/s12289-015-1245-8 ↗
20. Wang P, Hamila N, Boisse P, Chaudet P, Lesueur D (2015) Thermo-mechanical behavior of stretch-broken carbon fiber and thermoplastic resin composites during manufacturing. Polym Compos 36:694–70310.1002/pc.22988 ↗
21. Peng XQ, Cao J (2005) A continuum mechanics-based non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics. Compos Part A-Appl S 36:859–87410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.08.008 ↗
22. Badel P, Vidal-Sallé E, Boisse P (2008) Large deformation analysis of fibrous materials using rate constitutive equations. Comput Struct 86:1164–117510.1016/j.compstruc.2008.01.009 ↗
23. Lessard H, Lebrun G, Benkaddour A, Pham XT (2015) Influence of process parameters on the thermostamping of a [0/90]12 carbon/polyether ether ketone laminate. Compos Part A-Appl S 70:59–6810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.009 ↗
24. Peng XQ, Ding F (2011) Validation of a non-orthogonal constitutive model for woven composite fabrics via hemispherical stamping simulation. Compos Part A-Appl S 42:400–40710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.014 ↗
25. Yin H, Peng X, Du T, Guo Z (2014) Draping of plain woven carbon fabrics over a double-curvature mold. Compos Sci Technol 92:64–6910.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.013 ↗
26. Peng X, Rehman ZU (2011) Textile composite double dome stamping simulation using a non-orthogonal constitutive model. Compos Sci Technol 71:1075–108110.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.010 ↗
27. Guzman-Maldonado E, Hamila N, Boisse P, Bikard J (2015) Thermomechanical analysis, modelling and simulation of the forming of pre-impregnated thermoplastics composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 78:211–22210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.017 ↗
28. Dörr D, Schirmaier FJ, Henning F, Kärger L (2017) A viscoelastic approach for modeling bending behavior in Finite Element forming simulation of continuously fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part A-Appl S 94:113–12310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.027 ↗
29. Guzman-Maldonado E, Hamila N, Naouar N, Moulin G, Boisse P (2016) Simulation of thermoplastic prepreg thermoforming based on a visco-hyperelastic model and a thermal homogenization. Mater Design 93:431–44210.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.166 ↗