Microstructural analysis of pre-impreganted tapes consolidation
Source abstract
Abstract
In situ consolidation of pre-impregnated thermoplastic composite requires as much as possible intimate contact as well as an appropriate molecular diffusion across the interface where the intimate contact takes place. The last depends on the temperature that influences the molecular mobility. Thus, in order to evaluate the consolidation first we must describe accurately the composite surfaces and then, when placed in contact for manufacturing the laminate, a high-resolution simulation of the resulting thermal model must be accomplished to have access to the thermal history at the rough contact surface. In this paper based on a fractal description of the composite surface, the evolution of the intimate contact is performed by solving the flow equations during the compression. High-resolution thermal simulations based on the use of the proper generalized decomposition – PGD – are carried out on the geometrically evolving composite surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Material Properties and Processing · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Ammar A, Chinesta F, Diez P, Huerta A (2010) An error estimator for separated representations of highly multidimensional models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:1872–188010.1016/j.cma.2010.02.012 ↗
2. Barasinski A, Leygue A, Soccard E (2014) Identification of non-uniform thermal contact resistance in automated tape placement process. Int J Mater Prod Technol 7:479–486
3. Borodich FM, Mosolov AB (1992) Fractal roughness in contact problems. J Appl Math and Mech 56:786–79510.1016/0021-8928(92)90054-C ↗
4. Chinesta F, Leygue A, Bognet B, Ghnatios Ch, Poulhaon F, Bordeu F, Barasinski A, Poitou A, Chatel S, Maison-Le-Poec S (2014) First steps towards an advanced simulation of composites manufacturing by automated tape placement. Int J Mater Form 7:81–9210.1007/s12289-012-1112-9 ↗
5. Chinesta F, Keunings R, Leygue A (2014) The proper generalized decomposition for advanced numerical simulations, Springerbriefs in applied sciences and technology10.1007/978-3-319-02865-1 ↗
6. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Cueto E (2010) Recent advances and new challenges in the use of the Proper Generalized Decomposition for solving multidimensional models. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17:327–35010.1007/s11831-010-9049-y ↗
7. Chinesta F, Ladeveze P, Cueto E (2011) A short review in model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition. Arch Comput Methods Eng 18:395–40410.1007/s11831-011-9064-7 ↗
8. Coy JJ, Sidik SM (1979) Two-dimensional random surface model for asperity contact in elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Wear 57:293–31110.1016/0043-1648(79)90104-2 ↗
9. Ganti S, Bhushan B (1995) Generalized fractal analysis and its applications to engineering surfaces. Wear 180:17–3410.1016/0043-1648(94)06545-4 ↗
10. Ghnatios Ch, Chinesta F, Binetruy Ch (2015) The squeeze flow of composite laminates. Int J Mater Form 8:73–8310.1007/s12289-013-1149-4 ↗
11. Lee WI, Springer GS (1987) A model of the manufacturing process of thermoplastic matrix composites. J Compos Mater 21:1057–1082
12. Leon A, Barasinski A, Nadal E, Chinesta F High-resolution thermal analysis at thermoplastic pre-impregnated composite interfaces. Composite Interfaces. In press
13. Levy A, Heider D, Tierney J, Gillespie J (2014) Inter-layer thermal contact resistance evolution with the degree of intimate contact in the processing of thermoplastic composite laminates. J Compos Mater 48:491–50310.1177/0021998313476318 ↗
14. Longuet-Higgins MS (1957) Statistical properties of an isotropic random surface. A Math Phys Sci 250:157–17410.1098/rsta.1957.0018 ↗
15. Longuet-Higgins MS (1957) The Statistical Analysis of a Random, moving surface. A Math Phys Sci 249:321–38710.1098/rsta.1957.0002 ↗
16. Mandelbrot B (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
17. Mandelbrot B, Van Ness JW (1968) Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Rev 10:422–43710.1137/1010093 ↗
18. Mandelbrot B, Passoja D, Paullay A (1984) Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals. Nature 308:721–72210.1038/308721a0 ↗
19. Mandelbrot B (2002) Gaussian self-affinity and fractals. Springer, New York
20. Majumdar A, Tien CL (1990) Fractal Characterization and simulation of rough surfaces. Wear 136:313–32710.1016/0043-1648(90)90154-3 ↗
21. Nayak PK (1973) Some aspects of surface roughness measurement. Wear 26:165–17410.1016/0043-1648(73)90132-4 ↗
22. Oden PI, Majumdar A, Bhushan B, Padmanabhan A, Graham JJ (1992) AFM Imaging, roughness analysis and contact mechanics of magnetic tape and head surfaces. J Tribol 114:666–67410.1115/1.2920934 ↗
23. Thomas TR, Rosen BG, Amini N (1999) Fractal characterisation of the anisotropy of rough surfaces. Wear 232:41–5010.1016/S0043-1648(99)00128-3 ↗
24. Sayles RS, Thomas TR (1976) Thermal conductance of a rough elastic contact. Appl Energy 2:249–26710.1016/0306-2619(76)90012-X ↗
25. Sayles RS, Thomas TR (1977) The spatial representation of surface roughness by means of the structure function: a practical alternative to correlation. Wear 42:263–27610.1016/0043-1648(77)90057-6 ↗
26. Warren TL, Majumdar A, Krajcinovic D (1996) A fractal model for the rigid-perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces. J Appl Mech 63:47–5410.1115/1.2787208 ↗
27. Yaglom AM (1987) Correlation theory of stationary and related random function. Volume I - Basic Results. Springer, New York
28. Yang F, Pitchumani R (2001) A fractal cantor set based description of interlaminar contact evolution during thermoplastic composites processing. J Mater Sci 36:4661–467110.1023/A:1017950215945 ↗