journal article·2009-12

FEM analysis of edge preparation for chamfered tools

K. Khalili, M. Safaei

Publisher page

Abstract

The chamfer enhances the performance of the tool by strengthening the edge and reducing the possibility of tool wear and breakage. The strength of the chamfered tool can be investigated by analysis of process variables. This research investigates the effects of chamfer width and chamfer angle on process variables (force, stress, tool temperature and tool stress) in machining of a mild carbon low alloy steel by a cemented carbide tool using finite element method. The simulations show that the dead metal zone created under the tool acts as the effective cutting edge of the tool and increases the cutting forces. The predicted results show that the effect of chamfer width and angle is more pronounced on the thrust force than the cutting force. It also investigates the effect of chamfer on the effective shear angle and chip thickness, and comparison with available experimental results is presented. Tool temperatures are also predicted which suggests the presence of an optimum chamfer angle from the viewpoint of maximum tool temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Movahhedy MR, Altintas Y, Gadala MS (2002) Numerical analysis of metal cutting with chamfered and blunt tools. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:178–18810.1115/1.1445147 ↗
2. Kurt A, Seker U (2005) The effect of chamfer angle of polycrystalline cubic boron nitride cutting tool on the cutting forces and the tool stresses in finishing hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Mater Design 26:351–35610.1016/j.matdes.2004.06.022 ↗
3. Fang N, Wu Q (2005) The effects of chamfered and honed tool edge geometry in machining of three aluminum alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1178–118710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.12.003 ↗
4. Ozel T (2003) Modeling of hard part machining: effect of insert edge preparation in CBN cutting tools. J Mater Process Technol 141:284–29310.1016/S0924-0136(03)00278-4 ↗
5. Zhou JM, Walter H, Anderson M, Stahl JE (2003) Effect of chamfer angle on wear of PCBN cutting tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:301–30510.1016/S0890-6955(02)00214-6 ↗
6. DEFORM 2D, version 9.0 (2007) Scientific forming technologies corporation
7. Choudhury IA, See NL, Zukhairi M (2005) Machining with chamfered tools. J Matter Process Tech 170:115–12010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.110 ↗
8. Filice L, Micari F, Rizzuti S, Umbrello D (2007) A critical analysis on the friction modelling in orthogonal machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:709–71410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.05.007 ↗
9. Yen Y-C, Jain A, Chigurupati P, Wu W-T, Altan T (2004) Computer simulation of orthogonal cutting using a tool with multiple coatings. Mach Sci Technol 8(2):305–32610.1081/MST-200029230 ↗
10. Ceretti E, Filice L, Umbrello D, Micari F (2007) ALE simulation of orthogonal cutting: a new approach to model heat transfer phenomena at the tool-chip interface. Annals CIRP Vol. 56/110.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.019 ↗
11. Klocke F, Raedt H-W, Hoppe S (2001) 2D-FEM simulation of the orthogonal high speed cutting process. Mach Sci Technol 5(3):323–34010.1081/MST-100108618 ↗
12. Hirao M, Tlusty H, Sowerby R, Ghandra G (1982) Chip formation with chamfered tools. ASME J Ind, pp. 339–34210.1115/1.3185839 ↗
13. Yen Y-C, Jain A, Altan T (2004) A finite element analysis of orthogonal machining using different tool edge geometries. J Matter Process Tech 146:72–8110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00846-X ↗