journal article·2014-12

Study on the forming of sandwich shells with closed-cell foam cores

H. Mata, A. D. Santos, M. P. L. Parente, R. A. F. Valente, A. A. Fernandes, R. Natal Jorge

Publisher page

Abstract

The efficiency and safety of vehicles represent today one of the most important lines of developing in the automotive industry, for example by the introduction of new materials. In fact, the investment in advanced materials represents one of the most important strategies to reduce injury among vehicle occupants in traffic accidents. Associated with the development of safety systems, there is also the possibility of improving efficiency by the introduction of materials that lead to weight reduction, having a direct impact on fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Metallic foams are one of these materials, due to the excellent ratio between mechanical properties and density. The main goal of this investigation is to study the mechanical behaviour of aluminium sandwich structures, composed by a metallic foam core with two outer layers of metallic sheets. With this work, the authors intend to contribute to a better understanding and consequently to provide design guidelines for the plastic forming of these composites. In order to correctly characterize the mechanical behaviour of the sandwich structure, the foam core and sheets were tested separately. For the aluminium sheet a series of tensile tests were performed, using samples obtained along three different angles to the rolling direction. For the metal foam core, uniaxial compression tests were used. Finally, with the numerical model defined considering isotropic and anisotropic constitutive models, a set of numerical and experimental bulge tests were performed to evaluate the capacity of forming of these panels, using hydroforming processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Kleiner M, Geiger M, Klaus A (2003) Manufacturing of lightweight components by Metal Forming. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52:521–54210.1016/S0007-8506(07)60202-9 ↗
2. Evans G, Hutchinson JW, Ashby MF (1999) Multifunctional of cellular metal systems. Prog Mater Sci 43:171–22110.1016/S0079-6425(98)00004-8 ↗
3. Baumeister et al (1997) Aluminium foams for transport industry. Mat Design 18:217–22010.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-2 ↗
4. Miller RE (1998) A continuum plasticity model for the constitutive behaviour of foamed metals. Int. J. Mech. Sci10.1557/PROC-521-39 ↗
5. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Isotropic constitutive model for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solids 48:1253–127610.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
6. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular Solids. Cambridge University Press, New York10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
7. Sugimura Y, Meyer J, He MY, Bart-Smith H, Grenestedt J, Evans AG (1997) On the mechanical performance of closed cell Al alloy foams. Acta Mater 45:5245–525910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00148-1 ↗
8. Simone AE, Gibson LJ (1998) The effects of cell face curvature and corrugations on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Materialia 46:3929–393510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00072-X ↗
9. Bart-Smith H, Bastawros AF, Mumm DR, Evans AG, Sypeck DJ, Wadley HNG (1998) Compressive deformation and yielding mechanisms in cellular Al alloys determined using X-ray tomography and surface strain mapping. Acta Materialia 46:3583–359210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00025-1 ↗
10. Grenestedt JL (1998) Influence of wavy imperfections in cell walls on elastic stiffness of cellular solids. J Mech Phys Solids 46:29–5010.1016/S0022-5096(97)00035-5 ↗
11. Ashby MF et al (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
12. Mata H et al (2011) Analysis of sandwich shells with metallic foam cores based on the uniaxial tensile test. Am Inst Phys AIP 1353:1232
13. Mata H et al (2011) FEM analysis of sandwich shells with metallic foam cores. Key Eng Mater 473:659–66610.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.473.659 ↗
14. Mata H et al (2011) Modeling of sandwich sheets with metallic foam. Am Inst Phys AIP 1383:725
15. Smith LM et al (2005) NUMISHEET, Proc. 6th Int Conf Num Simulation 3D Sheet Metal Forming Proc., Detroit, USA
16. Santos AD et al (2006) iddrg’06, Proc Int Deep Drawing Research Group, Porto, Portugal
17. Ghosh S et al (2004) NUMIFORM, 8th Int Conf Num Methods Industrial Forming Processes, Ohio, USA
18. Owen DRJ et al. COMPUTATIONAL PLASTICITY VII, Proc 7th Int Conf on Comp Plasticity, Barcelona, Spain
19. Chinesta F, Cueto E, Advances in Material Forming, ESAFORM 10 years, Springer
20. Nakagawa T et al (1997) Various applications of hydraulic counter pressure deep drawing. J Mat Process Technol 71:160–16710.1016/S0924-0136(97)00163-5 ↗
21. Technical Data Sheet, Gleich Aluminium (2010)
22. Neto ES, et al (2008) Computational Methods for Plasticity, John Wiley & Sons Ltd10.1002/9780470694626 ↗
23. Mata H et al (2012) Numerical modelling and experimental study of sandwich shells with metal foam cores. Key Eng Mater 473:449–45410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.449 ↗
24. Nemat-Nasser S (1979) Decomposition of strain measures and their rates in finite deformation elastoplasticity. Int. J. Solids Struct 15:155–16610.1016/0020-7683(79)90019-2 ↗
25. von Mises R (1913) Mechanic der Festen Körper in Plastisch Deformablem Zustand, Göttinger Nachr. Math 582
26. Hill RA (1948) Theory of yielding and plasticity flow of anisotropy metals. Proc R Soc London Ser A-Math Phys Sci 193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
27. Abaqus, Inc. Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual Version 6.10
28. Hanssen AG et al (2002) Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams. Int J Mech Sci 44:359–40610.1016/S0020-7403(01)00091-1 ↗
29. Banhart J, Manufacture (2001) Characterization and application of cellular metals and metal foams. Progress in materials Science 46, 559–63210.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
30. Miller RE (2000) A continuum plasticity model for the constitutive and indentation behaviour of foamed metals. Int J Mech Sci 42:729–75410.1016/S0020-7403(99)00021-1 ↗
31. McCormack TM et al (2001) Failure of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores. Int J Solids Struct 38:4901–492010.1016/S0020-7683(00)00327-9 ↗
32. Mata H et al (2011) Numerical and Experimental Study of Sandwich Plates with Metallic Foam Cores, Int Conf on Comp Plasticity, Barcelona, Spain10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.473.659 ↗
33. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic metals. Int J Plast 7:693–71210.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
34. Barlat F, Chung K, Richmond O (1993) Strain rate potential for metals and its application to minimum plastic work path calculation. Int J Plast 9:1727–176310.1016/0749-6419(93)90013-G ↗
35. Barlat F, Maeda Y, Chung K, Yanagawa M, Brem JC, Hayashida Y, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S, Becker RC, Makosey S (1997) J Mech Phys Solids 45:1727–176310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00034-3 ↗
36. Chaparro BM, et al (2008) Material parameters identification: Gradient-based, genetic and hybrid optimization algorithms. Computational Materials Science, 44 110.1016/j.commatsci.2008.03.028 ↗