journal article·2017-06

Innovative metamodelling-based process design for manufacturing: an application to Incremental Sheet Forming

Giuseppina Ambrogio, Claudio Ciancio, Luigino Filice, Francesco Gagliardi

Publisher page

Abstract

The use of metamodelling techniques in process design has become indispensable to perform faster solutions reducing time to market. This approach allows the implementation of decision support tools which are easier to use than the conventional numerical simulations. In this paper, a robust metamodelling technique has been designed and its feasibility has been validated for the crucial problem of localised thinning in sheet metal forming process. The proposed methodology is based on the innovative integration between the Design of Experimental statistical method and the Kriging one. This approach, in fact, allows to analyse contemporary the continuous and categorical factors and, as a consequence, to define a single tool for changing process conditions (i.e., material and product shape). To test the reliability of the mathematical approach, the same was performed for the case study of Incremental Sheet Forming, a process strongly affected by the not homogeneous distribution of the thickness. Taking advantage of this strategy, a wide experimental investigation has been performed to build the base of knowledge of the problem both for the metamodelling design and for the validation of the decision support tool; moreover, the experimental data were utilized to set and validate a numerical model, which was subsequently used to enrich the dataset. The proposed metamodel, suitably modified according to each process peculiarities, can be generally adapted for sheet thickness prediction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Altmeyer G, Abed-Meraim F, Balan T (2009) Formability prediction of thin metal sheets using various localization criteria. Int J Mater Form 2:423–42610.1007/s12289-009-0479-8 ↗
2. Decultot N, Velay V, Robert L, Bernhart G, Massoni E (2000) Behaviour modelling of aluminium alloy sheet for single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 1:1151–115410.1007/s12289-008-0184-z ↗
3. Di Lorenzo R, Fratini L, Micari F (1999) Optimal blankholder force path in sheet metal forming processes: an AI based procedure. CIRP Ann 48(1):231–23410.1016/S0007-8506(07)63172-2 ↗
4. Gan W, Wagoner RH (2004) Die design method for sheet springback. Int J Mech Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.06.006 ↗
5. Mole N, Cafuta G, Štok B (2014) A 3D forming tool optimisation method considering springback and thinning compensation. J Mater Process Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.01710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.017 ↗
6. Zein H, El Sherbiny M, Abd-Rabou M, El shazly M (2014) Thinning and spring back prediction of sheet metal in the deep drawing process. Mater Des 53:797–808. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.07810.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.078 ↗
7. Marretta L, Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R (2010) Design of sheet stamping operations to control springback and thinning: a multi-objective stochastic optimization approach. Int J Mech Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.03.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.03.008 ↗
8. Di Lorenzo R, Ingarao G, Chinesta F (2010) Integration of gradient based and response surface methods to develop a cascade optimisation strategy for Y-shaped tube hydroforming process design. Adv Eng Softw. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.06.010 ↗
9. Hu W, Enying L, Li GY, Zhong ZH (2008) Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by the use of space mapping based metamodeling method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(7–8):642–65510.1007/s00170-007-1253-z ↗
10. Hu W, Yao LG, Hua ZZ (2008) Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by adaptive response surface based on intelligent sampling method. J Mater Process Technol 197(1):77–8810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.018 ↗
11. Wang H, Li E, Li GY (2009) The least square support vector regression coupled with parallel sampling scheme metamodeling technique and application in sheet forming optimization. Mater Des 30(5):1468–147910.1016/j.matdes.2008.08.014 ↗
12. Naceur H, Guo YQ, Batoz JL, Knopf-Lenoir C (2001) Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 43(10):2407–243410.1016/S0020-7403(01)00014-5 ↗
13. Guo YQ, Batoz JL, Naceur H, Bouabdallah S, Mercier F, Barlet O (2000) Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach. Comput Struct 78(1):133–14810.1016/S0045-7949(00)00095-X ↗
14. Filice L, Ambrogio G (2013) Optimised tool-path design to reduce thinning in incremental sheet forming process. Int J Mater Form 6:173–17810.1007/s12289-011-1065-4 ↗
15. Arfa H, Bahloul R, BelHadjSalah H (2013) Finite element modelling and experimental investigation of single point incremental forming process of aluminum sheets: influence of process parameters on punch force monitoring and on mechanical and geometrical quality of parts. Int J Mater Form 6:483–51010.1007/s12289-012-1101-z ↗
16. Manco G, Filice L, Ambrogio G (2011) Analysis of the thickness distribution varying tool trajectory in single-point incremental forming. Proc Inst Mech Eng B 225(3):348–35610.1177/09544054JEM1958 ↗
17. Chen X, Kai W, Feng Y (2013) Stochastic kriging with qualitative factors. Proc Winter Simul Conf: Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World. IEEE Press, 2013 p 790–80110.1109/WSC.2013.6721471 ↗
18. Ankenman B, Nelson B, Staum J (2010) Stochastic Kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper Res. doi: 10.1287/opre.1090.075410.1287/opre.1090.0754 ↗
19. Hamdaoui M, Oujebbour FZ, Habbal A, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2014) Kriging surrogates for evolutionary multi-objective optimization of CPU intensive sheet metal forming applications. Int J Mater Form. doi: 10.1007/s12289-014-1190-y10.1007/s12289-014-1190-y ↗
20. Qian P, Wu HZ, Wu CJ (2008) Gaussian process models for computer experiments with qualitative and quantitative factors. Technometrics. doi: 10.1198/00401700800000026210.1198/004017008000000262 ↗
21. Jaeckel P, Rebonato R (1999) The most general methodology for creating a valid correlation matrix for risk management and option pricing purposes. J Risk 2(2):17–28
22. Haktanir T (2008) Three-step N–R algorithm for the maximum-likelihood estimation of the general extreme values distribution parameters. Adv Eng Softw. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.00810.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.008 ↗
23. Kitazawa K, Nakajima A (1999) Cylindrical incremental drawing of sheet metals by CNC incremental forming process. Proc. 6th ICTP Conf. Nürnberg 1495–1500
24. Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-310.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3 ↗
25. Ambrogio G, De Napoli L, Filice L, Muzzupappa M (2007) Experimental evidences concerning geometrical accuracy after unclamping and trimming incrementally formed components. Key Eng Mater. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.53510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.535 ↗
26. Antognini AB, Zagoraiou M (2010) Exact optimal designs for computer experiments via Kriging metamodeling. J Stat Plan Infer. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.03.02710.1016/j.jspi.2010.03.027 ↗
27. Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2011) Design of ensemble neural network using entropy theory. Adv Eng Softw. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.02710.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.027 ↗
28. Couckuyt I, Forrester A, Gorissen D, De Turck F, Dhaene T (2012) Blind Kriging: implementation and performance analysis. Adv Eng Softw. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.03.00210.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.03.002 ↗