Construction of physical welding windows for magnetic pulse welding of 5754 aluminum with DC04 steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetic pulse welding (MPW) has potential applications where fusion welding is problematic, such as in dissimilar joints or where the very part integrity, as in electronic components, is likely to be impaired by hot environments. Mostly suited in lap configuration, its successful implementation hinges on multiple process parameters such as standoff distance between two parts, the discharge energy and the shape of inductor amongst others. From fundamental point, the impact angle and velocity are governing factors and remain difficult to apprehend via experimental approach. Numerical simulation is a viable tool to apprehend the effect of process parameters on impact angle and velocity and subsequently outline a physical weldability zone. On the contrary, the process weldability zone is experimentally determined for dissimilar joints made from A5754 on to DC 04 steel by varying the discharge energy and standoff distance using a straight I shape conductor. The shear strength of the joints is used as a marker to define the process weldability zone. Results suggest that weldability is reduced by increasing the discharge energy and standoff distance and a combination of two is required to optimize the outcome. The paper proposes to discuss process and physical weldability zones determined through numerical simulation and experimental tests.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Kapil A, Sharma A (2015) Magnetic pulse welding: an efficient and environmentally friendly multi-material joining technique. J Clean Prod 100:35–5810.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.042 ↗
2. Psyk V, Risch D, Kinsey BL, Tekkaya AE, Kleiner M (2011) Electromagnetic forming—(A) review. J Mater Process Technol 211(5):787–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.12.012 ↗
3. Manoharan P, Manogaran AP, Priem D, Marya S, Racineux G (2013) State of the art of electromagnetic energy for welding and powder compaction. Weld World 57(6):867–87810.1007/s40194-013-0080-0 ↗
4. Marya M, Marya S (2004) Interfacial microstructures and temperatures in aluminium–copper electromagnetic pulse welds. Sci Technol Weld Join 9(6):541–54710.1179/174329304X8685 ↗
5. Avettand-Fènoël M-N, Khalil C, Taillard R, Racineux G (2018) Effect of steel galvanization on the microstructure and mechanical performances of planar magnetic pulse welds of aluminum and steel. Metall Mater Trans A 49(7):2721–273810.1007/s11661-018-4651-y ↗
6. Blazynski TZ (2012) Explosive welding, forming and compaction. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
7. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic Behavior of Materials. Wiley, Hoboken10.1002/9780470172278 ↗
8. Daehn GS, Lippold J, Liu D, Taber G, Wang H (2012) Laser impact welding. In: 5th International conference on high speed forming, April 24th-26th 2012, Dortmund, Germany
9. Vivek A, Hansen SR, Liu BC, Daehn GS (2013) Vaporizing foil actuator: A tool for collision welding. J Mater Process Technol 213(12):2304–231110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.07.006 ↗
10. Aizawa T, Kashani M (2004) Magnetic pulse welding (MPW) method for dissimilar sheet metal joints. 57th Annu. Assem. Int. Inst. Weld
11. Manogaran AP, Manoharan P, Priem D, Marya S, Racineux G (2014) Magnetic pulse spot welding of bimetals. J Mater Process Technol 214(6):1236–124410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.01.007 ↗
12. Khalil C (2018) Développement du procédé de soudage par impulsion magnétique pour soudage hétérogène bimétallique et pour assemblage hybride métal/composite. PhD, Ecole Centrale de Nantes
13. Racineux G, Khalil C, Amosse Y (2018) Method of assembling two pieces of different materials and assembly resulting from the method of assembling. US Patent Application No 15/964(148):1
14. Khalil C, Marya S, Racineux G (2020) Magnetic pulse welding and spot welding with improved coil efficiency - application for dissimilar welding of automotive metal alloys. J Manuf Mater Process 4(3):69
15. Cuq-Lelandais JP, Ferreira S, Avrillaud G, Mazars G, Rauffet B (2014) Magnetic pulse welding: welding windows and high velocity impact simulations. In: 6th International Conference on High Speed Forming, pp 199–206
16. Cuq-Lelandais JP et al (2016) 3D impacts modeling of the magnetic pulse welding process and comparison to experimental data,. In: 7th International Conference on High Speed Forming, pp 13–22
17. Groche P, Becker M, Pabst C (2017) Process window acquisition for impact welding processes. Mater Des 118:286–29310.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.013 ↗
18. Lee T, Taber G, Vivek A, Daehn GS (2018) Characterization of high-speed flyer evolution by multi-probe photon doppler velocimetry. In: 8th International Conference on High Speed Forming, pp 1–6
19. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, vol 21, no 1, pp 541–547
20. Seidt JD, Gilat A, Klein JA, Leach JR (2007) High strain rate, high temperature constitutive and failure models for EOD impact scenarios. In: Proceedings of the SEM Annual Conference & Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, p 15
21. Smerd R, Winkler S, Salisbury C, Worswick M, Lloyd D, Finn M (2005) High strain rate tensile testing of automotive aluminum alloy sheet. Int J Impact Eng 32(1–4):541–56010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.013 ↗
22. Burgess TJ (1986) Electrical resistivity model of metals. In: Presented at the 4th International Conference on Megagauss Magnetic-Field Generation and Related Topics, Santa Fe, N. Mex., 14 Jul. 1986
23. Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Soft-ware Technology Corporation, Livermore (Google Sch)