Exploiting data in smart factories: real-time state estimation and model improvement in metal forming mass production
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Modern production systems have numerous sensors that produce large amounts of data. This data can be exploited in many ways, from providing insight into the manufacturing process to facilitating automated decision making. These opportunities are still underexploited in the metal forming industry, due to the complexity of these processes. In this work, a probabilistic framework is proposed for simultaneous model improvement and state estimation in metal forming mass production. Recursive Bayesian estimation is used to simultaneously track the evolution of process state and to estimate the deviation between the physics-based model and the real process. A sheet bending mass production process is used to test the proposed framework. A metamodel of the process is built using proper orthogonal decomposition and radial basis function interpolation. The model is extended with a deviation model in order to account for the difference between model and real process. Particle filtering is used to track the state evolution and to estimate the deviation model parameters simultaneously. The approach is tested and analysed using a large number of simulations, based on pseudo-data obtained from a numerical sheet bending model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Chinesta F, Cueto E, Abisset-Chavanne E, Duval JL, Khaldi FE (2018) Virtual, digital and hybrid twins: a new paradigm in data-based engineering and engineered data. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering10.1007/s11831-018-9301-4 ↗
2. Post J, Groen M, Klaseboer G (2017) Physical model based digital twins in manufacturing processes. In: Model based control for smart forming processes, proceedings of 10th forming technology forum. University of Twente, pp 87–92
3. Arthington MR, Cleaver C, Allwood J, Duncan S (2015) Measurement and control of variable geometry during ring rolling. In: 2015 IEEE conference on control applications (CCA). IEEE10.1109/CCA.2015.7320815 ↗
4. Husmann S, Kuhlenkötter B (2017) Investigation for an automated avoidance of ring climbing in radial-axial ring rolling. Procedia Eng 207:1242–124710.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.877 ↗
5. Fischer P, Heingärtner J, Renkci Y, Hora P (2018) Experiences with inline feedback control and data acquisition in deep drawing. Procedia Manuf 15:949–95410.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.401 ↗
6. Carruthers-Watt BN, Xue Y, Morris AJ A vision based system for strip tracking measurement in the finishing train of a hot strip mill. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation. IEEE, vol 201010.1109/ICMA.2010.5589402 ↗
7. Groche P, Hohmann J, Übelacker D (2019) Overview and comparison of different sensor positions and measuring methods for the process force measurement in stamping operations. Measurement 135:122–13010.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.058 ↗
8. Maier S, Liebig A, Kautz T, Volk W (2017) Tool-integrated spring back measuring system for automotive press shops. Prod Eng 11(3):307–31310.1007/s11740-017-0725-8 ↗
9. Maier S, Schmerbeck T, Liebig A, Kautz T, Volk W (2017) Potentials for the use of tool-integrated in-line data acquisition systems in press shops. J Phys Con Series 896:01203310.1088/1742-6596/896/1/012033 ↗
10. Purr S, Wendt A, Meinhardt J, Moelzl K, Werner A, Hagenah H, Merklein M (2016) Data-driven inline optimization of the manufacturing process of car body parts. In: Proceedings of the IDDRG 2016 conference, pp 200–20910.1088/1757-899X/159/1/012002 ↗
11. Havinga J, van den Boogaard T, Dallinger F, Hora P (2018) Feedforward control of sheet bending based on force measurements. J Manuf Process 31:260–27210.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.011 ↗
12. Strano M, Iorio L, Semeraro Q, Sofia R (2017) Fusion metamodeling of the bend deduction in air bending. In: AIP Conference proceedings, Author(s), vol 1896, p 10000310.1063/1.5008121 ↗
13. Asaadi E, Heyns PS (2017) A computational framework for bayesian inference in plasticity models characterisation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:455–48110.1016/j.cma.2017.04.017 ↗
14. Cornaggia A, Cocchetti G, Maier G, Buljak V (2018) Inverse structural analyses on small punch tests, with model reduction and stochastic approach. In: 2018 IEEE International conference on environment and electrical engineering and 2018 IEEE industrial and commercial power systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe). IEEE10.1109/EEEIC.2018.8494215 ↗
15. Col A (2003) Investigation on press forming scatter origin. In: Proceedings of the sixth international ESAFORM conference on material forming, pp 183–186
16. Hazra S, Williams D, Roy R, Aylmore R, Smith A (2011) Effect of material and process variability on the formability of aluminium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 211(9):1516–152610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.04.001 ↗
17. Havinga J, van den Boogaard AH, Klaseboer G (2016) Sequential improvement for robust optimization using an uncertainty measure for radial basis functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(4):1345–136310.1007/s00158-016-1572-5 ↗
18. Hess PE, Bruchman D, Assakkaf IA, Ayyub BM (2002) Uncertainties in material and geometric strength and load variables. Nav Eng J 114(2):139–16610.1111/j.1559-3584.2002.tb00128.x ↗
19. Aspenberg D, Larsson R, Nilsson L (2012) An evaluation of the statistics of steel material model parameters. J Mater Process Technol 212(6):1288–129710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.01.016 ↗
20. Wiebenga J, Atzema E, An Y, Vegter H, van den Boogaard A (2014) Effect of material scatter on the plastic behavior and stretchability in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 214(2):238–25210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.08.008 ↗
21. Hora P, Heingärtner J, Manopulo N, Tong L (2011) Zero failure production methods based on a process integrated virtual control. In: AIP Conference proceedings, AIP, vol 1383, pp 35–4710.1063/1.3623590 ↗
22. Allwood J, Duncan S, Cao J, Groche P, Hirt G, Kinsey B, Kuboki T, Liewald M, Sterzing A, Tekkaya A (2016) Closed-loop control of product properties in metal forming. CIRP Ann 65(2):573– 59610.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.002 ↗
23. Buljak V, Maier G (2011) Proper orthogonal decomposition and radial basis functions in material characterization based on instrumented indentation. Eng Struct 33(2):492–50110.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.006 ↗
24. Ristic B, Arulampalam S, Gordon N (2004) Beyond the Kalman Filter, 1st edn. Artech House Publishers
25. Gordon N, Salmond D, Smith A (1993) Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian state estimation. IEE Proceedings F Radar and Signal Processing 140(2):10710.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0015 ↗
26. Liu J, West M (2001) Combined parameter and state estimation in simulation-based filtering. In: Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer, New York, pp 197–22310.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9_10 ↗
27. Cowper CR, Symonds PS (1957) Strain-hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Tech. Rep 28, Division of applied mathematics, Brown University10.21236/AD0144762 ↗
28. Gonzȧlez D, Badías A, Alfaro I, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2017) Model order reduction for real-time data assimilation through extended Kalman filters. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 326:679–69310.1016/j.cma.2017.08.041 ↗
29. Marchand B, Chamoin L, Rey C (2019) Parameter identification and model updating in the context of nonlinear mechanical behaviors using a unified formulation of the modified constitutive relation error concept. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:1094–111310.1016/j.cma.2018.09.008 ↗
30. Storvik G (2002) Particle filters for state-space models with the presence of unknown static parameters. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):281–28910.1109/78.978383 ↗