Prediction of machining quality due to the initial residual stress redistribution of aerospace structural parts made of low-density aluminium alloy rolled plates
Source abstract
Abstract
During the machining of thick, large and complex aluminium parts, the redistribution of initial residual stresses is the main reason for machining errors such as dimensional variations and the post-machining distortions. These errors can lead to the rejection of the parts or to additional conforming operations increasing production costs. It is therefore a requirement to predict potential geometrical and dimensional errors resulting from a given machining process plan and in taking into consideration the redistribution of the residual stresses. A specific finite element tool which allows to predict the behaviour of the workpiece during machining due to its changing geometry and to fixture-workpiece contacts has been developed. This numerical tool uses a material removal approach which enables to simulate the machining of parts with complex geometries. In order to deal with industrial problems this numerical tool has been developed for parallel computing, allowing the study of parts with large dimensions. In this paper, the approach developed to predict the machining quality is presented. First, the layer removal method used to determine the initial residual stress profiles of an AIRWAREⓇ 2050-T84 alloy rolled plate is introduced. Experimental results obtained are analysed and the same layer removal method is simulated to validate the residual stress profiles and to test the accuracy of the developed numerical tool. The machining of a part taken from this rolled plate is then performed (experimentally and numerically). The machining quality obtained is compared, showing a good agreement, thus validating the numerical tool and the developed approach. This study also demonstrates the importance of taking into account the mechanical behaviour of the workpiece due to the redistribution of the initial residual stresses during machining when defining a machining process plan.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Asante J (2008) A combined contact elasticity and finite element-based model for contact load and pressure distribution calculation in a frictional workpiece-fixture system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(5–6):578–58810.1007/s00170-007-1187-5 ↗
2. Cerutti X, Mocellin K (2014) Parallel finite element tool to predict distortion induced by initial residual stresses during machining of aeronautical parts. Int J Mater Form. doi: 10.1007/s12289-014-1164-010.1007/s12289-014-1164-0 ↗
3. Chenot J (1989) Three dimensional finite element modeling of forging process. In: Computational Plasticity: Models, Software and Applications, pp. 793–816. Proceedings of the Second International Conference Held in Barcelona
4. Das S, Chandra U (1999) “Residual stress and distortion,” in handbook of aluminum metallurgy: processes and equipment, vol 1. G.E. Totten and D.S. Mackenzie, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
5. Denkena B, Boehnke D, Len L (2008) Machining induced residual stress in structural aluminum parts. Prod Eng 2(3):247–25310.1007/s11740-008-0097-1 ↗
6. Denkena B, Leon LD (2009) Milling induced residual stresses in structural parts out of forged aluminium alloys. Int J Mach Mach Mater 4(4):335–344. doi: 10.1504/IJMMM.2008.02371710.1504/IJMMM.2008.023717 ↗
7. Denkena B, de Leon Garcia L (2007) Fem-simulation of high-performance-milling. In: Proceeding of the CIRP Conference on modelling of machining operations, Sicily
8. Fourment L, Chenot JL, Mocellin K (1999) Numerical formulations and algorithms for solving contact problems in metal forming simulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(9):1435–146210.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19991130)46:9<1435::AID-NME707>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
9. Heymes F, Commet B, Dubost B, Lassince P, Lequeu P, Raynaud GM (1997) Development of new al alloys for distortion free machined aluminium aircraft components. ASM International(USA), 249–255
10. Jeanmart P, Bouvaist J (1985) Finite element calculation and measurement of thermal stresses in quenched plates of high–strength 7075 aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Technol 1(10):765–76910.1179/mst.1985.1.10.765 ↗
11. Lequeu P, Lassince P, Warner T, Raynaud GM (2010) Engineering for the future: weight saving and cost reduction initiatives. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 73:147–15910.1108/00022660110386663 ↗
12. Lequeu P, Smith K, Danielou A (2010) Aluminum-copper-lithium alloy 2050 developed for medium to thick plate. J Mater Eng Perform 19(6):841–84710.1007/s11665-009-9554-z ↗
13. Li B, Melkote SN (1999) Improved workpiece location accuracy through fixture layout optimization. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39(6):871–88310.1016/S0890-6955(98)00072-8 ↗
14. Ma K, Goetz R, Svrivatsa S (2010) Modeling of residual stress and machining distortion in aerospace components. ASM Handbook, Metals Process Simulation 22B:386–40710.31399/asm.hb.v22b.a0005537 ↗
15. Rai JK, Xirouchakis P (2008) Finite element method based machining simulation environment for analyzing part errors induced during milling of thin-walled components. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(6):629–64310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.11.004 ↗
16. Schultz R, Karabin M (2002) Characterization of machining distortion by strain energy density and stress range. In: 6th European conference on residual stresses, Materials Science Forum, vol 404–407, pp 61–6810.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.404-407.61 ↗
17. Sim W (2010) Challenges of residual stress and part distortion in the civil airframe industry. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop 5:446–455
18. Tandon R, Green DJ (1990) Residual stress determination using strain gage measurements. J Am Ceram Soc 73(9):2628–263310.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06738.x ↗
19. Tang ZT, Liu ZQ, Ai X (2007) Optimization of bulkhead processing sequence for multi-frame monolithic components by fem. Adv Mater Res 24–25:355–36010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.24-25.355 ↗
20. Treuting RG, Read WTJ (1951) A mechanical determination of biaxial residual stress in sheet materials. J Appl Phys 22(2):130–13410.1063/1.1699913 ↗
21. Van Der Veen S, Heymes F, Boselli J, Lequeu P, Lassince P (2006) Low internal stress al-zn-cu-mg plates. US Patent App. 11/299, 683
22. Virkar AV (1990) Determination of residual stress profile using a strain gage technique. J Am Ceram Soc 73 (7):2100–210210.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05276.x ↗
23. Wang SP, Padmanaban S (2004) A new approach for fem simulation of nc machining processes. AIP Conf Proc 712(1):1371–1376. doi: 10.1063/1.176672010.1063/1.1766720 ↗
24. Wei Y, Wang X (2007) Computer simulation and experimental study of machining deflection due to original residual stress of aerospace thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3–4):260–265. doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0470-110.1007/s00170-006-0470-1 ↗
25. Yang Y, Li M, Li K (2013) Comparison and analysis of main effect elements of machining distortion for aluminum alloy and titanium alloy aircraft monolithic component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5431-x10.1007/s00170-013-5431-x ↗