Is it possible to identify Johnson-Cook law parameters from machining simulations?
Source abstract
Abstract
Material laws are central to any machining simulation. Johnson-Cook material law, owing to its simplicity, has often been used for machining simulations. However, at high strain rates (∼ 106 s-1) which are normally encountered during high speed machining, the same Johnson-Cook parameters are used for simulation which are usually measured at much lower strain rates. A possible solution to this problem is to conduct inverse simulation experiments to deduce the Johnson-Cook parameters. At high cutting speeds the chip formation takes place very rapidly and is essentially adiabatic. Thus through the study of the adiabatic stress-strain curves one can deduce information about the chip formation process [1]. In this numerical study, different sets of Johnson-Cook parameters that give rise to almost identical adiabatic stress-strain curves are identified by using the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm. High-speed machining simulations performed with these parameters show almost indistinguishable results, indicating that uniquely identifying material parameters from inverse analysis may be difficult.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Martin Bäker, Finite element investigation of the flow stress dependence of chip formation, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 167, Issue 1, 25 August 2005, Pages 1-13.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.076 ↗
2. M. Vaz, D.R.J. Owen, V. Kalhori, M. Lundbald, L.-E. Lindgren, Modelling and Simulation of Machining Processes, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, Volume 14, Issue 2, 1 June 2007, Pages 173-204.10.1007/s11831-007-9005-7 ↗
3. T.H.C. Childs, K. Maekawa, T. Obikawa, Y. Yamane, Metal machining: theory and applications, London: Arnold, 2000.
4. D. Umbrello, R. M'Saoubi, J.C. Outeiro, The influence of Johnson-Cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316L steel, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Volume 47, Issues 3-4, March 2007, Pages 462-470.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.006 ↗
5. Jing Shi and C. Richard Liu, The Influence of Material Models on Finite Element Simulation of Machining J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 126, 849 (2004.10.1115/1.1813473 ↗
6. Johnson G. R., Cook W. H.: A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 514-546, 1983.
7. Anand Ramesh, Shreyes N. Melkote, Modeling of white layer formation under thermally dominant conditions in orthogonal machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Volume 48, Issues 3-4, March 2008, Pages 402-414.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.09.007 ↗
8. William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, and Brian P. Flannery. Numerical recipes in C (2nd ed.): the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1992.
9. HKS Inc., USA, ABAQUS/Explicit Theory and User’s Manual, Version 6.9.1, 2009.