journal article·2012-06

Identification of material parameters of the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman damage law by combined experimental, numerical sheet metal blanking techniques and artificial neural networks approach

Haykel Marouani, Hamdi Aguir

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents a method for the identification of coupled damage model parameters in sheet metal blanking and a study of their sensitivity to the blanking clearance. The existing finite element models easily describe the elastoplastic behaviour occurring during the sheet metal blanking. However, the description of the damage evolution is much more delicate to appreciate. The proposed method combines finite element method (FEM) with artificial neural networks (ANN) analysis in order to identify the values of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) parameters. The blanking tests are carried out to obtain the experimental material response under loading (blanking force—blanking penetration curves). A finite element model is used to compute the load displacement curve depending on a systematic variation of GTN parameters. Via a full factorial design, a numerical database is built up and is used for the ANN training. The identification of the damage properties (for a fixed clearance) is done by minimizing the error between an experimental load displacement curve and a predicted one by the ANN function. The identified damage law parameters are validated on the other experimental configurations of blanking tests (fixed clearance, different punch velocities). Varying the blanking clearance allows us to study its impact on the damage law parameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Numerical methods in engineering · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Klingenberg W, Singh UP (2005) Comparison of two analytical models of blanking and proposal of a new model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:519–527. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.00210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.09.002 ↗
2. Rachik M, Roelandt JM, Maillard A (2002) Some phenomenological and computational aspects of sheet metal blanking simulation. J Mater Process Technol 128:256–265. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00460-010.1016/S0924-0136(02)00460-0 ↗
3. Marouani H, Ben Ismail A, Hug E, Rachik M (2008) Rate-dependent constitutive model for sheet metal blanking investigation. Mater Sci Eng, A 487:162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.02310.1016/j.msea.2007.10.023 ↗
4. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–217. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
5. Atkins AG (1997) Fracture mechanics and metal forming: damage mechanics and the local approach of yesterday and today. in Fracture research in retrospect. 1997. Rotterdam, Balkema.
6. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I—Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
7. Saanouni K, Chaboche JL, Milne I, Ritchie RO, Karihaloo B (2003) Computational Damage Mechanics: Application to Metal Forming Simulation, in Comprehensive Structural Integrity. 2003, Pergamon: Oxford. pp 321–376.10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/03072-X ↗
8. Rousselier G (1987) Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture. Nucl Eng Des 105:97–111. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-210.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-2 ↗
9. Eikrem PA, Zhang ZL, Østby E, Nyhus B (2008) Numerical study on the effect of prestrain history on ductile fracture resistance by using the complete Gurson model. Eng Fract Mech 75:4568–4582. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.05.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.05.006 ↗
10. Varvani-Farahani A, Sharma M, Kianoush MR (2005) Fatigue damage analysis and life assessment under variable amplitude loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng, A 403:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.01810.1016/j.msea.2005.05.018 ↗
11. Hambli R, Reszka M (2002) Fracture criteria identification using an inverse technique method and blanking experiment. Int J Mech Sci 44:1349–1361. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00049-810.1016/S0020-7403(02)00049-8 ↗
12. Springmann M, Kuna M (2005) Identification of material parameters of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model by combined experimental and numerical techniques. Comp Mater Sci 33:501–509. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.09.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.02.002 ↗
13. Mahnken R, Stein E (1996) A unified approach for parameter identification of inelastic material models in the frame of the finite element method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 136:225–258. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(96)00991-710.1016/0045-7825(96)00991-7 ↗
14. Aguir H, Chamekh A, BelHadjSalah H, Dogui AW, Hambli R (2009) Parameter identification of a non-associative elastoplastic constitutive model using ANN and multi-objective optimization. Int J Mater Form 2:75–82. doi: 10.1007/s12289-009-0392-110.1007/s12289-009-0392-1 ↗
15. Aguir H, Marouani H (2010) GTN parameters identification using ANN in sheet metal blanking. Int J Mater Form 3(Suppl 1):113–116. doi: 10.1007/s12289-010-0720-510.1007/s12289-010-0720-5 ↗
16. Marouani H, Ben Ismail A, Hug E, Rachik M (2009) Numerical investigations on sheet metal blanking with high speed deformation. Mater Des 30:3566–3571. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.02810.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.028 ↗
17. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 17:389–407. doi: 10.1007/BF0003619110.1007/BF00036191 ↗
18. Dutta BK, Guin S, Sahu MK, Samal MK (2008) A phenomenological form of the q2 parameter in the Gurson model. Int J Press Vessels Pip 85:199–21010.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.10.009 ↗
19. Abendroth M, Kuna M (2006) Identification of ductile damage and fracture parameters from the small punch test using neural networks. Eng Fract Mech 73:710–72510.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.10.007 ↗
20. Abaqus/Explicit User’s Manual. Version 6.2.
21. Franklin AG (1969) Comparison between a quantitative microscope and chemical methods for assessment of non-metallic inclusions. J Iron Steel Inst 207:181–186