The influence of process parameters and tool geometry on mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum lap joints
Source abstract
Abstract
The results of an experimental investigation on the lap joining of AA6022-T4 aluminum alloy blanks by FSW are reported in the present paper; in particular, the joints strength was investigated. The experimental campaign was performed on sheets having a thickness of 1.2 mm, lap joined by means of a CNC machine tool. Several tests were carried out by varying process parameters (namely feed rate and rotational speed), joints configuration and tool geometry (two different tools were adopted for this purpose). The first tool was a very simple device with a flat shoulder and a cylindrical pin. The second one was a more complex tool, with a flat shoulder and a threaded probe. During these tests welding forces were also measured. A universal testing machine was employed to evaluate the strength of the friction stir welded joints as a function of the different process conditions. Interesting results in terms of tensile strength of the joints were obtained using both the simple and the threaded tools. In particular it was found that the use of threaded pin tools and the correct choice of the relative sheet positioning may lead to the improvement of the mechanical properties of the obtained joints. Moreover, the use of the threaded tool showed a certain reduction in welding forces, with respect to the simple tool.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · RFID technology advancements · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. W.M. Thomas, E.D. Nicholas, J.C. Needam, M.G. Murch, P. Templesmith, C.J. Dawes. GB Patent Application No. 9125978.8, December 1991 and US Patent No. 5460317, October 1995.
2. W.J. Arbegast, Z. Jin, A. Beaudoin, T.A. Bieler, B. Radhakrishnan, editors. Hot Deformation of Aluminum Alloys III, TMS, PA, USA, 2003, p. 313.
3. M. Ericsson, L.Z. Jin, R. Sandström. Fatigue properties of friction stir overlap welds. International Journal of Fatigue 29 (2007) 57–68.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.052 ↗
4. R. John, K.V. Jata, K. Sadananda. Residual stress effects on near-threshold fatigue crack growth in friction stir welds in aerospace alloys. International Journal of Fatigue 25 (2003) 939–948.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.002 ↗
5. D. Fersini, A. Pirondi. Fatigue behaviour of Al2024- T3 friction stir welded lap joints. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 74 (2007) 468–480.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.07.010 ↗
6. G. Buffa, G. Campanile, L. Fratini a, A. Prisco. Friction stir welding of lap joints: Influence of process parameters on the metallurgical and mechanical properties. Materials Science and Engineering A 519 (2009) 19–26.
7. Y.C. Chen, K. Nakata. Effect of tool geometry on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir lap welded magnesium alloy and steel. Materials Science and Engineering A 519 (2009) 19–26.10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.046 ↗
8. M. K. Kulekci, A Şik, E. Kaluç. Effects of tool rotation and pin diameter on fatigue properties of friction stir welded lap joints. Int. J. of Adv. Manuf. Tech. (2008) 36:877–882.10.1007/s00170-006-0901-z ↗
9. W M Thomas, D G Staines, I M Norris, R de Frias. Friction Stir Welding – Tools and developments. FSW seminar, IST- Porto, Portugal 2002.
10. L. Cederqvist, A. P. Reynolds. Factors Affecting the Properties of Friction Stir Welded Aluminum Lap Joints.The Welding Journal Research Supplement 80-12, 281-287, 2001.
11. T. Nishihara. Development of simplified FSW tool. In 6th International Symposium on FSW, 2006.
12. G. D'Urso, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, G. Maccarini. The effect of process parameters and tool geometry on mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum butt joints. Proceedings of the 12th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Twente (NL) April 27-29, 2009.10.1007/s12289-009-0480-2 ↗