Numerical simulation of friction stir welding by natural element methods
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we address the problem of numerically simulating the Friction Stir Welding process. Due to the special characteristics of this welding method (i.e., high speed of the rotating pin, very large deformations, etc.) finite element methods (FEM) encounter several difficulties. While Lagrangian simulations suffer from mesh distortion, Eulerian or Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) ones still have difficulties due to the treatment of convective terms, the treatment of the advancing pin, and many others. Meshless methods somewhat alleviate these problems, allowing for an updated Lagrangian framework in the simulation. Accuracy is not affected by mesh distortion (and hence the name meshless), but the price to pay is the computational cost, higher than in the FEM. The method used here, the Natural Element Method (NEM), presents some interesting characteristics, such as the ease of imposition of essential boundary conditions and coupling with FEM codes. Even more, since the method is formulated in a Lagrangian setting, it is possible to track the evolution of any material point during the process and also to simulate the Friction Stir Welding (FSW) of two slabs of different materials. The examples shown in this paper cover some of the difficulties related with the simulation of the FSW process: very large deformations, complex nonlinear and strongly coupled thermomechanical behaviour of the material and mixing of different materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Khandkar M, Khan J (2001) Thermal modeling of overlap friction stir welding for al-alloys. J Mater Process Manuf Sci 10(2):91–105
2. Cho J, Boyce D, Dawson P (2005) Modeling strain hardening and texture evolution in friction stir welding of stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 398:146–16310.1016/j.msea.2005.03.002 ↗
3. Chenot JL, Massoni E (2006) Finite element modelling and control of new metal forming processes. J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1194–120010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.031 ↗
4. Buffa G, Hu J, Shivpuri R, Fratini L (2006) A continuum based fem model for friction stir welding-model development. Mater Sci Eng A 419:389–39610.1016/j.msea.2005.09.040 ↗
5. Buffa G, Hu J, Shivpuri R, Fratini L (2006) Design of the friction stir welding tool using the continuum based FEM model. Mater Sci Eng A 419:381–38810.1016/j.msea.2005.09.041 ↗
6. Guerdoux S, Fourment L (2007) Error estimation and accurate mapping based ALE formulation for 3D simulation of friction stir welding. In: Numiform 2007, Oporto10.1063/1.2740809 ↗
7. Anahid M, Khoei AR (2008) New development in extended finite element modeling of large elasto-plastic deformations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 75(10):1133–117110.1002/nme.2281 ↗
8. Nguyen VP, Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Duflot M (2008) Meshless methods: review and key computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simul 79:763–81310.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.003 ↗
9. Sukumar N, Moran B, Belytschko T (1998) The natural element method in solid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(5):839–88710.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19981115)43:5<839::AID-NME423>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
10. Cueto E, Sukumar N, Calvo B, Martínez MA, Cegoñino J, Doblare M (2003) Overview and recent developments in natural neighbour Galerkin methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng 10(4):307–38410.1007/BF02736253 ↗
11. González D, Cueto E, Doblaré M (2004) Volumetric locking in natural neighbour Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61(4):611–63210.1002/nme.1085 ↗
12. Thiessen AH (1911) Precipitation averages for large areas. Mon Weather Rep 39:1082–1084
13. Sibson R (1980) A vector identity for the Dirichlet tesselation. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 87:151–15510.1017/S0305004100056589 ↗
14. Sibson R (1981) A brief description of natural neighbour interpolation. In: Barnett V (ed) Interpreting multivariate data. Wiley, New York, pp 21–36
15. Cueto E, Doblaré M, Gracia L (2000) Imposing essential boundary conditions in the natural element method by means of density-scaled α-shapes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 49–4:519–54610.1002/1097-0207(20001010)49:4<519::AID-NME958>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
16. Yvonnet J, Ryckelynck D, Lorong P, Chinesta F (2004) A new extension of the natural element method for non-convex and discontnuous problems: the constrained natural element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60(8):1452–147410.1002/nme.1016 ↗
17. Zienkiewicz OC, Godbolet PN (1974) Flow of plastic and visco-plastic solids with special reference to extrusion and forming processes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 8:3–16
18. Zhou J, Li L, Duszczyk J (2003) 3D FEM simulation of the whole cycle of aluminium extrusion throughout the transient state and the steady state using the updated Lagrangian approach. J Mater Process Technol 134:383–39710.1016/S0924-0136(02)01128-7 ↗
19. Alfaro I, Bel D, Cueto E, Doblare M, Chinesta F (2006) Three-dimensional simulation of aluminium extrusion by the α-shape based natural element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(33–36):4269–428610.1016/j.cma.2005.08.006 ↗
20. Gonzalez D, Cueto E, Martinez MA, Doblare M (2004) Numerical integration in natural neighbour Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 60(12):2077–210410.1002/nme.1038 ↗
21. Alfaro I, Yvonnet J, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2007) A study on the performance of natural neighbour-based Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 7(12):1436–146510.1002/nme.1993 ↗