Direct spinning of carbon nanotube fibres from liquid feedstock
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes are regarded by many as being the next generation in high performance materials due to their unique properties. The Cambridge Process was developed to utilize these unique properties by directly spinning carbon nanotube fibres drawn from an aerogel sock. The sock is formed from carbon nanotubes grown via a catalytic chemical vapour deposition (CVD) process. Due to the nature of CVD, the process is readily scalable. Kilometres of fibre can be made at a rate of 20 m/min. Altering process parameters (catalyst concentration, feedstock injection rate, furnace temperature, and gas flow rate) allows the production of nanotubes of a desired morphology. The fibres have been characterized with scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Raman Spectroscopy in order to confirm nanotube composition and orientation. The fibre possesses mechanical and electrical properties that rival or exceed those of present-day materials. Mechanical properties can be enhanced by increasing the degree of orientation of the nanotubes with the long axis of the fibre and by overall densification. These effects can be accomplished through drawing the fibre and solvent treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Murr L (2007) Nanoparticulate materials in antiquity: the good, the bad and the ugly. Microsc Microanal 13:1118–111910.1017/S1431927607072625 ↗
2. Murr LE et al (2004) Carbon nanotubes, nanocrystal forms, and complex nanoparticle aggregates in common fuel-gas combustion sources and the ambient air. J Nanopart Res 6(2):241–25110.1023/B:NANO.0000034651.91325.40 ↗
3. Baker RTK (1973) Formation of filamentous carbon from iron, cobalt and chromium catalyzed decomposition of acetylene. J Catal 30(1):8610.1016/0021-9517(73)90055-9 ↗
4. Hillert M, Lange N (1958) The structure of graphite filaments. Keit Krist 111:24–3410.1524/zkri.1959.111.1-6.24 ↗
5. Radushkevich LV, Lukyanovich VM (1952) O strukture ugleroda, obrazujucegosja pri termiceskom razlozenii okisi ugleroda na zeleznom kontakte. Zurn Fisic Chim 26:88–95
6. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–5810.1038/354056a0 ↗
7. Popov VN (2004) Carbon nanotubes: properties and application. Mater Sci Eng, R Rep 43(3):61–10210.1016/j.mser.2003.10.001 ↗
8. Zhang M, Atkinson KR, Baughman RH (2004) Multifunctional carbon nanotube yarns by downsizing an ancient technology. Science 306:1358–136110.1126/science.1104276 ↗
9. Ericson LM et al (2004) Macroscopic, neat, single-walled carbon nanotube fibers. Science 305:1447–145010.1126/science.1101398 ↗
10. Allaoui A et al (2002) Mechanical and electrical properties of a MWNT/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 62(15):1993–199810.1016/S0266-3538(02)00129-X ↗
11. Lau AK-T, Hui D (2002) The revolutionary creation of new advanced materials–carbon nanotube composites. Compos Part B: Eng 33(4):263–27710.1016/S1359-8368(02)00012-4 ↗
12. Meguid SA, Sun Y (2004) On the tensile and shear strength of nano-reinforced composite interfaces. Mater Des 25(4):289–29610.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.018 ↗
13. Meincke O et al (2004) Mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of carbon-nanotube filled polyamide-6 and its blends with acrylonitrile/butadiene/styrene. Polymer 45(3):739–74810.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.013 ↗
14. Thostenson ET, Chou TW (2003) On the elastic properties of carbon nanotube-based composites: modelling and characterization. J Phys D: Appl Phys 36:573–58210.1088/0022-3727/36/5/323 ↗
15. Vigolo B et al (2000) Macroscopic fibers and ribbons of oriented carbon nanotubes. Science 290:1331–133410.1126/science.290.5495.1331 ↗
16. Wang C et al (2004) Polymers containing fullerene or carbon nanotube structures. Prog Polym Sci 29(11):1079–114110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.001 ↗
17. Zhu HW et al (2002) Direct synthesis of long single-walled carbon nanotube strands. Science 296:884–88610.1126/science.1066996 ↗
18. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes—the route toward applications. Science 297:787–79210.1126/science.1060928 ↗
19. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Eklund P (1996) Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. Academic, San Diego
20. Terrones M et al (2004) Materials Today, p. 3010.1016/S1369-7021(04)00447-X ↗
21. Li Y-L, Kinloch IA, Windle AH (2004) Direct spinning of carbon nanotube fibers from chemical vapor deposition synthesis. Science 304:276–27810.1126/science.1094982 ↗
22. Tibbets GG, Bernard CA, Gorkiewicz DW (1994) Role of sulfur in the production of carbon fibers in the vapor phase. Carbon 32(4):569–57610.1016/0008-6223(94)90074-4 ↗
23. Motta MS et al (2008) The role of sulphur in the synthesis of carbon nanotubes by chemical vapour deposition at high temperatures. J Nanoscience Nanotechnol 8:2442–244910.1166/jnn.2008.500 ↗
24. Koziol K et al (2007) High-performance carbon nanotube fiber. Science 318:1892–189510.1126/science.1147635 ↗
25. Motta M et al (2005) Mechanical properties of continuously spun fibers of carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 5(8):1529–153310.1021/nl050634+ ↗
26. Motta M et al (2007) High performance fibres from ‘Dog Bone’ carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater 19(21):3721–372610.1002/adma.200700516 ↗
27. Chae HG, Kumar S (2008) MATERIALS SCIENCE: Making strong fibers. Science 319:908–90910.1126/science.1153911 ↗
28. Aluminum Conductor Composite Reinforced (2006) Technical Summary. ACCR, Sao Paulo
29. Chawla KK (1998) Fibrous materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511525209 ↗
30. West EG (1982) Copper and its alloys. Wiley, Chichester