journal article·2025-12Open access

Failure prediction by using a recurrent neural network in incremental sheet forming with active medium

Sebastian Thiery, Mazhar Zein El Abdine, Jens Heger, Noomane Ben Khalifa

Abstract

Abstract Industrial sheet metal components often have complex geometries with both concave and convex features. For small batch sizes, such components can be manufactured by incremental sheet forming, using the pressure of an active medium underneath the workpiece to create the convex feature. However, the additional load superimposed by the pressure causes instability and renders the process more prone to failure, in particular to cracking of the workpiece. The reliability of the manufacturing process could be improved if the occurrence of failure were predictable and thus preventable. To achieve this goal, the trend of the forming forces and the change of the workpiece geometry prior to cracking are experimentally analyzed. Subsequently, the dataset obtained from the experiments is used to fit a model based on long short-term memory and on a sliding window approach. This model reliably predicts the probability of failure with an accuracy and recall of 0.97 and 0.89 respectively, demonstrating its potential for online monitoring of the manufacturing process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Emmens WC, Sebastiani G, van den Boogaard AH (2010) The technology of incremental sheet forming—a brief review of the history. J Mater Process Technol 210:981–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.02.014 ↗
2. Martins P, Bay N, Skjoedt M et al (2008) Theory of single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann 57:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.04710.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.047 ↗
3. McAnulty T, Jeswiet J, Doolan M (2017) Formability in single point incremental forming: a comparative analysis of the state of the art. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 16:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.07.00310.1016/j.cirpj.2016.07.003 ↗
4. Skjoedt M, Silva MB, Martins PAF et al (2010) Strategies and limits in multi-stage single-point incremental forming. J Strain Anal Eng Des 45:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247JSA57410.1243/03093247JSA574 ↗
5. Vanhulst M, Lee Y, Steinfels D (2025) ESAFORM benchmark 2024: study on the geometric accuracy of a complex shape with single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-025-01928-110.1007/s12289-025-01928-1 ↗
6. Taleb Araghi B, Manco GL, Bambach M et al (2009) Investigation into a new hybrid forming process: incremental sheet forming combined with stretch forming. CIRP Ann 58:225–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.10110.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.101 ↗
7. Meier H, Magnus C, Smukala V (2011) Impact of superimposed pressure on dieless incremental sheet metal forming with two moving tools. CIRP Ann 60:327–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.13410.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.134 ↗
8. Ben Khalifa N, Thiery S (2019) Incremental sheet forming with active medium. CIRP Ann 68:313–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.04310.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.043 ↗
9. Thiery S, Zein El Abdine M, Heger J (2021) Closed-loop control of product geometry by using an artificial neural network in incremental sheet forming with active medium. Int J Mater Form 14:1319–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01598-110.1007/s12289-020-01598-1 ↗
10. Duflou JR, Habraken A-M, Cao J et al (2018) Single point incremental forming: state-of-the-art and prospects. Int J Mater Form 11:743–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1387-y10.1007/s12289-017-1387-y ↗
11. Duflou JR, Tunçkol Y, Szekeres A et al (2007) Experimental study on force measurements for single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 189:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.01.005 ↗
12. Aerens R, Eyckens P, van Bael A et al (2010) Force prediction for single point incremental forming deduced from experimental and FEM observations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:969–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2160-210.1007/s00170-009-2160-2 ↗
13. Petek A, Kuzman K, Suhač B (2009) Autonomous on-line system for fracture identification at incremental sheet forming. CIRP Ann 58:283–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.09210.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.092 ↗
14. Ambrogio G, Filice L, Micari F (2006) A force measuring based strategy for failure prevention in incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 177:413–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.07610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.076 ↗
15. Filice L, Ambrogio G, Micari F (2006) On-line control of single point incremental forming operations through punch force monitoring. CIRP Ann 55:245–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60408-910.1016/S0007-8506(07)60408-9 ↗
16. Fiorentino A (2013) Force-based failure criterion in incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:557–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4777-410.1007/s00170-013-4777-4 ↗
17. Gao RX, Krüger J, Merklein M et al (2024) Artificial intelligence in manufacturing: state of the art, perspectives, and future directions. CIRP Ann 73:723–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.10110.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101 ↗
18. Cao J, Bambach M, Merklein M et al (2024) Artificial intelligence in metal forming. CIRP Ann 73:561–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.10210.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.102 ↗
19. Nagargoje A, Kankar PK, Jain PK (2023) Application of artificial intelligence techniques in incremental forming: a state-of-the-art review. J Intell Manuf 34:985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01868-y10.1007/s10845-021-01868-y ↗
20. Ambrogio G, Filice L (2009) Application of neural network technique to predict the formability in incremental forming process. KEM 410:381–389. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.38110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.381 ↗
21. Ambrogio G, Filice L, Guerriero F (2011) Prediction of incremental sheet forming process performance by using a neural network approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:921–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3011-x10.1007/s00170-010-3011-x ↗
22. Liu Z, Li Y (2020) Small data-driven modeling of forming force in single point incremental forming using neural networks. Eng Comput 36:1589–1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00781-610.1007/s00366-019-00781-6 ↗
23. Duan S, Kozjek D, Mehr E (2024) Forming force prediction in double-sided incremental forming via GNN-based transfer learning. J Manuf Process 120:867–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.09310.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.093 ↗
24. Pimenov DY, Bustillo A, Wojciechowski S et al (2023) Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: analysis and critical review. J Intell Manuf 34:2079–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01923-210.1007/s10845-022-01923-2 ↗
25. Farahani MA, McCormick MR, Gianinny R et al (2023) Time-series pattern recognition in smart manufacturing systems: a literature review and ontology. J Manuf Syst 69:208–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.02510.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.025 ↗
26. Manjunath K, Tewary S, Khatri N (2022) Surface roughness prediction in milling using long-short term memory modelling. Mater Today Proc 64:1300–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.12610.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.126 ↗
27. Ma J, Luo D, Liao X et al (2021) Tool wear mechanism and prediction in milling TC18 titanium alloy using deep learning. Measurement 173:108554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10855410.1016/j.measurement.2020.108554 ↗
28. Peng D, Li H, Dai Y et al (2022) Prediction of milling force based on spindle current signal by neural networks. Measurement 205:112153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11215310.1016/j.measurement.2022.112153 ↗
29. Chen Z, Liu Y, Valera-Medina A et al (2021) Multi-faceted modelling for strip breakage in cold rolling using machine learning. Int J Prod Res 59:6347–6360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.181275310.1080/00207543.2020.1812753 ↗
30. Meyes R, Donauer J, Schmeing A et al (2019) A recurrent neural network architecture for failure prediction in deep drawing sensory time series data. Procedia Manuf 34:789–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.20510.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.205 ↗
31. Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G et al (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann 54:88–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-310.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3 ↗
32. Thiery S, Zein El Abdine M, Heger J et al (2025) Manufacturing of irregular shapes through force control in incremental sheet forming with active medium. Adv Ind Manuf Eng 10:100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2025.10015710.1016/j.aime.2025.100157 ↗
33. Jeswiet J, Young D (2005) Forming limit diagrams for single-point incremental forming of aluminium sheet. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 219:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440505X3221010.1243/095440505X32210 ↗
34. Chen G (2016) A gentle tutorial of recurrent neural network with error backpropagation. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.02583v3
35. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long Short-term memory. Neural Comput 9:1735–178010.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
36. Cho K, van Merrienboer B, Bahdanau D et al (2014) On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approaches. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1259v210.3115/v1/W14-4012 ↗
37. Chung J, Gulcehre C, Cho K et al (2014) Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.3555v1
38. Studer S, Bui TB, Drescher C et al (2021) Towards CRISP-ML(Q): a machine learning process model with quality assurance methodology. MAKE 3(2):392–413. https://doi.org/10.3390/make302002010.3390/make3020020 ↗
39. Schröer C, Kruse F, Gómez JM (2021) A systematic literature review on applying CRISP-DM process model. Procedia Comput Sci 181:526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.19910.1016/j.procs.2021.01.199 ↗
40. Sitaula C, Shahi TB (2022) Monkeypox virus detection using pre-trained deep learning-based approaches. J Med Syst 46:78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01868-210.1007/s10916-022-01868-2 ↗
41. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980v9
42. Semeniuta S, Severyn A, Barth E (2016) Recurrent Dropout without Memory Loss. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.05118v2