Inverse identification of a coupled hardening law with GTN damage model parameters for cold-rolled steel: application to the deep drawing process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Zidane I, Guines D, Léotoing L, Ragneau E (2010) Development of an in-plane biaxial test for forming limit curve (FLC) characterization of metallic sheets. Meas Sci Technol 21:055701. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/5/05570110.1088/0957-0233/21/5/055701 ↗
2. Leotoing L, Guines D, Zidane I, Ragneau E (2013) Cruciform shape benefits for experimental and numerical evaluation of sheet metal formability. J Mater Process Technol 213:856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.01310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.12.013 ↗
3. Gurson AL (1975) Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials incorporating void nucleation, growth, and interaction. Thesis, Brown University, United States of America
4. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 17:389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0003619110.1007/BF00036191 ↗
5. Tvergaard V (1982) On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18:237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001568610.1007/BF00015686 ↗
6. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X10.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
7. Brunet M, Sabourin F, Mguil-Touchal S (1996) The prediction of necking and failure in 3 D. Sheet forming analysis using damage variable. J Phys IV JP 6:C6-473-C6-482. https://doi.org/10.1051/jp4:199664710.1051/jp4:1996647 ↗
8. Brunet M, Mguil S, Morestin F (1998) Analytical and experimental studies of necking in sheet metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00131-910.1016/S0924-0136(98)00131-9 ↗
9. Brunet M, Morestin F (2001) Experimental and analytical necking studies of anisotropic sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 112:214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00578-710.1016/S0924-0136(01)00578-7 ↗
10. Chen Z, Dong X (2009) The GTN damage model based on Hill’48 anisotropic yield criterion and its application in sheet metal forming. Comput Mater Sci 44:1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.02010.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.020 ↗
11. Ramazani A, Abbasi M, Prahl U, Bleck W (2012) Failure analysis of DP600 steel during the cross-die test. Comput Mater Sci 64:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.03110.1016/j.commatsci.2012.01.031 ↗
12. Kami A, MollaeiDariani B, SadoughVanini A et al (2014) Application of a GTN damage model to predict the fracture of metallic sheets subjected to deep-drawing. Proc Rom Acad Ser A - Math Phys Tech Sci Inf Sci 15:300–309
13. Amaral R, Teixeira P, Santos AD, de Sá JC (2018) Assessment of different ductile damage models and experimental validation. Int J Mater Form 11:435–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1381-410.1007/s12289-017-1381-4 ↗
14. Djouabi M, Ati A, Manach PY (2019) Identification strategy influence of elastoplastic behavior law parameters on Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman damage parameters: Application to DP980 steel. Int J Damage Mech 28:427–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951877213010.1177/1056789518772130 ↗
15. More S, Kumar A, Narasimhan K (2022) Parameter identification of GTN damage model using response surface methodology for single point incremental sheet forming of IF steel. Adv Mater Process Technol 8:1753–1768. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2021.187477010.1080/2374068X.2021.1874770 ↗
16. Miloud MH, Imad A, Benseddiq N et al (2013) A numerical analysis of relationship between ductility and nucleation and critical void volume fraction parameters of Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 227:2634–2646. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621347623210.1177/0954406213476232 ↗
17. HadjMiloud M, Zidane I, Mendas M (2019) Coupled identification of the hardening behavior laws and Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman damage parameters - Validation on tear test of 12NiCr6 CT specimen. Frat ed Integrità Strutt 13:630–642. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.5710.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.57 ↗
18. Andrade-Campos A, Bastos N, Conde M et al (2022) On the inverse identification methods for forming plasticity models using full-field measurements. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1238:012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1238/1/01205910.1088/1757-899x/1238/1/012059 ↗
19. El Khatib O, Hütter G, Pham RD et al (2023) A non-iterative parameter identification procedure for the non-local Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman model based on standardized experiments. Int J Fract 241:73–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-023-00689-910.1007/s10704-023-00689-9 ↗
20. Belouettar K, Thibaud S, OuldOuali M, Harouche MK (2023) A numerical-experimental coupled method for the identification of model parameters from µ-SPIF test using a finite element updating method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128:5195–5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-12210-610.1007/s00170-023-12210-6 ↗
21. Dizajyekan AZ, Mirnia MJ, Dariani BM (2023) Fracture investigation in single point incremental forming of the Al/Cu laminated sheets using coupled damage plasticity model. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 43:242–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.04.01010.1016/j.cirpj.2023.04.010 ↗
22. Ouladbrahim A, Belaidi I, Khatir S et al (2022) Prediction of Gurson Damage Model Parameters Coupled with Hardening Law Identification of Steel X70 Pipeline Using Neural Network. Met Mater Int 28:370–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-021-01024-410.1007/s12540-021-01024-4 ↗
23. Abbasi M, Bagheri B, Ketabchi M, Haghshenas DF (2012) Application of response surface methodology to drive GTN model parameters and determine the FLD of tailor welded blank. Comput Mater Sci 53:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.02010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.020 ↗
24. Abbasi M, Shafaat MA, Ketabchi M et al (2012) Application of the GTN model to predict the forming limit diagram of IF-Steel. J Mech Sci Technol 26:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-1038-z10.1007/s12206-011-1038-z ↗
25. Li J, Li S, Xie Z, Wang W (2015) Numerical simulation of incremental sheet forming based on GTN damage model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:2053–2065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7333-610.1007/s00170-015-7333-6 ↗
26. Hancock JW, Mackenzie AC (1976) On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states. J Mech Phys Solids 24:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-710.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-7 ↗
27. Thomason PF (1990) Ductile fracture of metals. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
28. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part 1 - yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 99:2–15. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.344340110.1115/1.3443401 ↗
29. Chu CC, Needleman A (1980) Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 102:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.322480710.1115/1.3224807 ↗
30. Koplik J, Needleman A (1988) Void growth and coalescence in porous plastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 24:835–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(88)90051-010.1016/0020-7683(88)90051-0 ↗
31. Springmann M, Kuna M (2006) Determination of ductile damage parameters by local deformation fields: Measurement and simulation. Arch Appl Mech 75:775–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-006-0033-910.1007/s00419-006-0033-9 ↗
32. Gholipour H, Biglari FR, Nikbin K (2019) Experimental and numerical investigation of ductile fracture using GTN damage model on in-situ tensile tests. Int J Mech Sci 164:105170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10517010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105170 ↗
33. Hambli R (2001) Comparison between Lemaitre and Gurson damage models in crack growth simulation during blanking process. Int J Mech Sci 43:2769–2790. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00070-410.1016/S0020-7403(01)00070-4 ↗
34. Schmitt W, Sun DZ, Blauel JG (1997) Damage mechanics analysis (Gurson model) and experimental verification of the behaviour of a crack in a weld-cladded component. Nucl Eng Des 174:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00135-010.1016/S0029-5493(97)00135-0 ↗
35. Rachik M, Roelandt JM, Maillard A (2002) Some phenomenological and computational aspects of sheet metal blanking simulation. J Mater Process Technol 128:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00460-010.1016/S0924-0136(02)00460-0 ↗
36. Springmann M, Kuna M (2005) Identification of material parameters of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model by combined experimental and numerical techniques. Comput Mater Sci 32:544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.09.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2004.09.010 ↗
37. Lemiale V, Chambert J, Picart P (2009) Description of numerical techniques with the aim of predicting the sheet metal blanking process by FEM simulation. J Mater Process Technol 209:2723–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.01910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.019 ↗
38. Marouani H, Ben Ismail A, Hug E, Rachik M (2009) Numerical investigations on sheet metal blanking with high speed deformation. Mater Des 30:3566–3571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.02810.1016/j.matdes.2009.02.028 ↗
39. Kossakowski PG (2012) Simulation of ductile fracture of S235JR steel using computational cells with microstructurally-based length scales. J Theor Appl Mech 50:589–607
40. Kiran R, Khandelwal K (2014) Gurson model parameters for ductile fracture simulation in ASTM A992 steels. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 37:171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1209710.1111/ffe.12097 ↗
41. Achouri M, Germain G, Dal Santo P, Saidane D (2013) Numerical integration of an advanced Gurson model for shear loading: Application to the blanking process. Comput Mater Sci 72:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.03510.1016/j.commatsci.2013.01.035 ↗
42. Zhao PJ, Chen ZH, Dong CF (2016) Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanical damage for DP600 steel in fine-blanking process. J Mater Process Technol 236:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.05.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.05.002 ↗
43. Li ZH, Bilby BA, Howard IC (1994) a Study of the Internal Parameters of Ductile Damage Theory. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 17:1075–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00836.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00836.x ↗
44. Zhang ZL (1996) A sensitivity analysis of material parameters for the Gurson constitutive model. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19:561–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00992.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00992.x ↗
45. Banabic D, Kami A (2018) Applications of the Gurson’s model in sheet metal forming. MATEC Web Conf 190:01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20181900100210.1051/matecconf/201819001002 ↗
46. Gavrus A (1996) Identification automatique des paramètres rhéologiques par analyse inverse. Thesis, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, France
47. Simulia Abaqus (2016) Porous metal plasticity. Abaqus Analysis User's Guide. https://130.149.89.49:2080/v2016/books/usb/default.htm?startat=pt05ch23s02abm17.html. Accessed 15 Jun 2024
48. Bouktir Y, Chalal H, Abed-Meraim F (2018) Prediction of necking in thin sheet metals using an elastic–plastic model coupled with ductile damage and bifurcation criteria. Int J Damage Mech 27:801–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951770403010.1177/1056789517704030 ↗
49. Belguebli A, Zidane I, Hadj Amar A, Benhamou A (2024) Numerical investigation of an extra-deep drawing process with industrial parameters: formability analysis and process optimization. Frat ed Integrità Strutt 18:45–62. https://doi.org/10.3221/igf-esis.68.0310.3221/igf-esis.68.03 ↗
50. EIMS (1978) Entreprise industrielle de materiel sanitaire. Miliana, Algeria. https://www.eimsanitaire.dz/. Accessed 20 Jun 2024
51. Abbadeni M, Zidane I, Zahloul H, Madaoui Z (2019) Comparative study of conventional and hydromechanical deep drawing processes based on finite element analysis. Frat ed Integrita Strutt 13:282–290. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.2810.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.28 ↗
52. Hadj Amar A, Zidane I, Zahloul H, Belguebli A (2024) Controlling non-uniform blank holder pressures in an extra-deep drawing process for enhancing formability and product quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 133:129–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13746-x10.1007/s00170-024-13746-x ↗
53. Holmberg S, Enquist B, Thilderkvist P (2004) Evaluation of sheet metal formability by tensile tests. J Mater Process Technol 145:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.004 ↗
54. Keeler SP, Brazier WG (1977) Relationship between laboratory material characterization and press-shop formability. Microalloying 75 Proc 517–530
55. Paul SK (2021) Controlling factors of forming limit curve: a review. Adv Ind Manuf Eng 2:100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2021.10003310.1016/j.aime.2021.100033 ↗