Accurate surrogate models for the flat rolling process
Source abstract
Abstract
Surrogate models, both polynomial and ANN-based (artificial neural networks), are developed to predict the rolling load in cold rolling of flat metals. An accurate but fast model was developed to serve as high-fidelity model for the training of the machine learning algorithms, allowing for large sampling sizes (up to 1000 samples) with different sampling methods, a number of eight input parameters, and various configurations of surrogate models. The ANN-based models have shown excellent predictive abilities provided that the training sampling is sufficiently large (more than 500 elements). In contrast, polynomial models converge much rapidly to their optimal accuracy (samplings of tens of elements) but their predictive ability is more limited, unless the order of the polynomials is increased. The latin hypercube sampling was more efficient than the random sampling in all cases.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Orowan E (1943) The Calculation of Roll Pressure in Hot and Cold Flat Rolling. Proc Instn Mech Eng 150:14010.1243/PIME_PROC_1943_150_025_02 ↗
2. Huisman HJ, Huétink J (1985) A combined eulerian-lagrangian three-dimensional finite-element analysis of edge-rolling. J Mech Working Technol 11:33310.1016/0378-3804(85)90005-1 ↗
3. Zaaf M, Mebarek A, Amirat A (2019) Simplified two-dimensional model for the prediction of pressures and velocities in hot strip rolling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2691-510.1007/s00170-018-2691-5 ↗
4. Chenot JL, Montmitonnet P, Bern A, Bertrand-Corsini C (1991) A method for determining free surfaces in steady state finite element computations. C Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 92(2):24510.1016/0045-7825(91)90242-X ↗
5. Montmitonnet M, Fourment L, Ripert U, Ngo QT, Ehrlacher A (2016) State of the Art in Rolling Process Modelling. Berg Huettenmaenn Monatsh 161:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-016-0520-410.1007/s00501-016-0520-4 ↗
6. Shigaki Y, Montmitonnet P (2017) 3D finite element model for roll stack deformation coupled with a Multi-Slab model for strip deformation for flat rolling simulation10.1063/1.5008231 ↗
7. Slimani K, Zaaf M, Bendjama H (2018) Simplified Modelling of Tandem Cold Rolling. Metallofiz Noveishie Tekhnol 40(11):1509–152010.15407/mfint.40.11.1509 ↗
8. Deng J, Sun J, Peng W, Hu Y, Zhang D (2019) Application of neural networks for predicting hot-rolled strip crown. Appl Soft Comput J 78:119–13110.1016/j.asoc.2019.02.030 ↗
9. Nelson AW, Malik AS, Wendel JC, Zipf ME (2014) Probabilistic force perdiction in cold sheet rolling by Bayesian inference. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:041006–04101110.1115/1.4027434 ↗
10. Li X, Luan F, Wu Y (2020) A comparative assessment of six machine LearningModelsLearning models for prediction of bending force in hot StripRollingStrip rolling process. Metals 10:685. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1005068510.3390/met10050685 ↗
11. Hu Z, Yang J, Zhao Z, Sun H, Che H (2016) Multi-objective optimization of rolling schedules on aluminum hot tandem rolling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7909-110.1007/s00170-015-7909-1 ↗
12. Bagheripoor M, Bisadi H (2013) Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of roll forceand roll torque in hot strip rolling process. Appl Math Model 37:4593–460710.1016/j.apm.2012.09.070 ↗
13. Guo ZY, Sun JN, Du FS (2016) Application of finite element method and artificial neural networks to predict the rolling force in hot rolling of Mg alloy plates. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 116:43–48. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n1a710.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n1a7 ↗
14. Montmitonnet P, Wey E, Delamare F, Chenot JL, Fromholz C, De Vathaire (1987) A mechanical model of cold rolling. Influence of the friction law on roll flattening calculated by a Finite Element Method, Proc. 4th Int. Steel Rolling Conf. (Deauville), IRSID/ATS
15. Carretta Y, Boman R, Stephany A, Legrand N, Laugier M, Ponthot J-P (2011) MetaLub – a slab method software for the numerical simulation of mixed lubrication regime in cold strip rolling. Proc Inst Mech Eng J – J Eng Trib 225(J9):894–90410.1177/1350650111410126 ↗
16. Zaaf M, Labaiz M, Sidoroff F (2006) Evaluation de la sensibilité du laminage aux modèles de comportement. Mécanique Ind 7:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:200605310.1051/meca:2006053 ↗
17. Dang HL (2013) Modélisation simplifié du processus de laminage, PhD Thesis, University Paris Est
18. Al-Salehi, Firbank TC, Lancaster PR (1973) An experimental determination of the roll pressure Distributions in cold rolling. Int J Mech 15:693–71010.1016/0020-7403(73)90049-0 ↗
19. Gratacos P, Montmitonnet Fromholz PC, Chenot JL (1992) A plane strain elastoplastic finite element model for cold rolling of thin strip. Int J Mech Sci 34:195–21010.1016/0020-7403(92)90071-N ↗
20. Badıas A, Alfaro I, Gonzalez D, Chinesta F, Cueto E (2018) Reduced order modeling for physically-based augmented reality. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 341:53–7010.1016/j.cma.2018.06.011 ↗
21. Dang VT, Labergère C, Lafon P (2019) Adaptive metamodel-assisted shape optimization for springback in metal forming processes. Int J Mater Form 12:535–55210.1007/s12289-018-1433-4 ↗
22. Song L, Xu D, Wang X, Yang Q, Ji Y (2022) Application of machine learning to predict and diagnose for hot-rolledstriprolled strip crown. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08825-w10.1007/s00170-022-08825-w ↗
23. Dunke F, Nickel S (2020) Neural networks for the metamodeling of simulation models with online decision making. Simul Model Pract Theory 99:10201610.1016/j.simpat.2019.102016 ↗
24. Nguyen PT (2021) Convolutional neural networks for enhanced classification mechanisms of metamodels. J Syst Softw 172:1186010.1016/j.jss.2020.110860 ↗
25. Roman ND et al (2020) Application and characterization of metamodels based on artificial neural networks for building performance simulation: A systematic review. Energy Build 217:10997210.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109972 ↗
26. Ließ M (2020) At the interface between domain knowledge and statistical sampling theory: Conditional distribution based sampling for environmental survey (CODIBAS). CATENA 187:10442310.1016/j.catena.2019.104423 ↗