journal article·2014-12

Numerical assessment of springback for the deep drawing process by level set interpolation using shape manifolds

Balaji Raghavan, Guenhael Le Quilliec, Piotr Breitkopf, Alain Rassineux, Jean-Marc Roelandt, Pierre Villon

Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an original shape representation approach for post-springback characterization based on the automatic generation of parameterized level set functions. The central idea is the concept of the shape manifold representing the design domain in the reduced-order shape-space. Performing Proper Orthogonal Decomposition on the shapes followed by using the Diffuse Approximation allows us to efficiently reduce the problem dimensionality and to interpolate uniquely between admissible input shapes, while also determining the smallest number of parameters needed to characterize the final formed shape. We apply this methodology to the problem of springback assessment for the deep drawing operation of metal sheets.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Eggertsen PA, Mattiasson K (2009) Int J Mech Sci 51(7):54710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.05.007 ↗
2. Teimouri R, Baseri H, Rahmani B, Bakhshi-Jooybari M (2012) Int J Mater Form 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12289-012-1117-410.1007/s12289-012-1117-4 ↗
3. D’Acquisto L, Fratini L (2001) J Manuf Process 3(1):2910.1016/S1526-6125(01)70031-X ↗
4. Le Quilliec G, Breitkopf P, Roelandt J, Juillard P (2013) Int J Mater Form 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12289-012-1122-710.1007/s12289-012-1122-7 ↗
5. Lebon J, Le Quilliec G, Breitkopf P, Filomeno Coelho R, Villon P (2013) Int J Mater Form1–13. doi: 10.1007/s12289-013-1126-y10.1007/s12289-013-1126-y ↗
6. Zhang WH, Beckers P, Fleury C (1995) Int J Numer Methods Eng 38(13):228310.1002/nme.1620381309 ↗
7. Raghavan B, Breitkopf P, Tourbier Y, Villon P (2013) Struct Multidiscip Optim doi: 10.1007/s00158-013-0942-5
8. Oshier S, Sethian JA (1988) J Comput Phys 79:1210.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2 ↗
9. Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader AM (2004) J Comput Phys 194(1):36310.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.032 ↗
10. Murat F, Simon J (1976) Pre-publication du laboratoire d’analyse numerique, vol 76015. Universite de Paris, p 6
11. Moes N, Stolz C, Bernard P, Chevaugeon N (2011) Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(3):35810.1002/nme.3069 ↗
12. Legrain G, Cartraud P, Perreard I, Moes N (2011) Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(7):91510.1002/nme.3085 ↗
13. Duvigneau R (2006) INRIA research report RR-5949
14. Xie X, Mirmehdi M (2011) Image Vis Comput 29(2–3):16710.1016/j.imavis.2010.08.011 ↗
15. Wang S, Lim K, Khoo B, Wang M (2007) J Comput Phys 221(1):39510.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.029 ↗
16. Forrester AIJ, Keane AJ (2009) Prog Aerosp Sci 45:5010.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001 ↗
17. Breitkopf P, Naceur H, Rassineux A, Villon P (2005) Comput Struct 83(17–18):141110.1016/j.compstruc.2004.07.011 ↗
18. Willcox K, Peraire J (2002) AIAA J 40(11):232310.2514/2.1570 ↗
19. Berkooz G, Holmes P, Lumley JL (1993) Annu Rev Fluid Mech 25(1):53910.1146/annurev.fl.25.010193.002543 ↗
20. Cordier L, El Majd BA, Favier J (2010) Int J Numer Methods Fluids 63(2):269
21. Audouze C, De Vuyst F, Nair P (2009) Int J Numer Methods Eng 80(8):102510.1002/nme.2540 ↗
22. Raghavan B, Breitkopf P (2012) Engineering with Computers. doi: 10.1007/s00366-012-0263-010.1007/s00366-012-0263-0 ↗
23. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Cueto E (2010) Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(8–9):111410.1002/nme.2794 ↗
24. Chinesta F, Ladeveze P, Cueto E (2011) Archives Comput Methods Eng 18(4):39510.1007/s11831-011-9064-7 ↗
25. Ghnatios C, Chinesta F, Cueto E, Leygue A, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2011) Compos A 42:116910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.001 ↗
26. Ghnatios C, Masson F, Huerta A, Cueto E, Leygue A, Chinesta F (2012) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213:2910.1016/j.cma.2011.11.018 ↗
27. Hamdaoui M, Le Quilliec G, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2013) Int J Mater Form. doi: 10.1007/s12289-013-1132-0
28. Raghavan B, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2010) Eur J Comput Mech 19(5–7):67110.3166/ejcm.19.671-697 ↗
29. Raghavan B, Xiao M, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2012) Eur J Comput Mech 21(3–6):32510.1080/17797179.2012.719316 ↗
30. Raghavan B, Xia L, Breitkopf P, Rassineux A, Villon P (2013) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 265:174. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2013.06.01010.1016/j.cma.2013.06.010 ↗
31. Nayroles B, Touzot G, Villon P (1992) Comput Mech 10(5):30710.1007/BF00364252 ↗
32. Millan D, Rosolen A, Arroyo M (2013) Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(7):68510.1002/nme.4403 ↗
33. Millan D, Rosolen A, Arroyo M (2013) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 261–262(7):181
34. Jan S, Zolesio J (1992) Introduction to shape optimization. Springer, Berlin
35. Schulz V (2012) A Riemannian view on shape optimization. Forschungsbericht / Universität Trier, Mathematik, Informatik. Found Comput Math 12–1. arXiv: 1203.1493
36. Fukunaga K, Olsen D (1971) IEEE Trans Comput 20:17610.1109/T-C.1971.223208 ↗
37. Breitkopf P, Rassineux A, Touzot G, Villon P (2000) Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(3):45110.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000530)48:3<451::AID-NME892>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
38. Nielsen KB, Br¿nnberg N (1993) Simulation of the 2D draw bending process: numisheet benchmark. In: Makinouchi A, Nakamachi E, Onate E, Wagoner RK (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference NUMISHEET ’93: Numisheet. Tokyo
39. Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation
40. Chung K, Lee M, Kim D, Kim C, Wenner ML, Barlat F (2005) Int J Plast 21(5):861