Influence of surface roughness on cold formability in bending processes: a multiscale modelling approach with the hybrid damage mechanics model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Experimental and numerical investigations on the description of cold formability of extra abrasion-resistant steel considering surface roughness effects were performed in this study. A novel multiscale numerical approach to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of surface roughness on the cold formability/bendability of heavy plates was proposed and verified. The macroscopic ductile damage behavior of the investigated steel was described by a hybrid damage mechanics model, whose parameters were calibrated by notched round-bar (NRB) tensile tests and single-edge notched bending (SENB) tests. The surface roughness was characterized by confocal microscopy and statistically incorporated into a two-dimensional representative volume element (RVE) model. For the assessment of the bendability of heavy plates in the component level, the critical ratio between the punch radius and the sample thicknessr/tin three-point bending tests was predicted and compared with experimental results. After the surface roughness effects were taken into consideration, a significant improvement in the predicted results was achieved. A good match between the simulation and experimental results confirmed the indispensable influences of surface roughness on the bendability of steels and validated the efficiency of the multiscale simulation approach in the quantitative description of surface roughness affected ductile damage evolutions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Grässel O, Krüger L, Frommeyer G, Meyer LW (2000) High strength Fe-Mn-(Al, Si) TRIP/TWIP steels development - properties - application. Int J Plast 16(10-11). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-210.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-2 ↗
2. Münstermann S, Lian J, Bleck W (2012) Design of damage tolerance in high-strength steels. Int J mater res 103(6):755–764. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.11069710.3139/146.110697 ↗
3. Deng, G, Nagamoto, K, Nakano, Y, Nakanishi T (2009). Evaluation of the effect of surface roughness on crack initiation life. In: ICF12, Ottawa
4. Javidi A, Rieger U, Eichlseder W (2008) The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life. Int J Fatigue 30:10–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.005 ↗
5. Xie HB, Jiang ZY, Yuen WYD (2011) Analysis of friction and surface roughness effects on edge crack evolution of thin strip during cold rolling. Tribol Int 44(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.03.02910.1016/j.triboint.2011.03.029 ↗
6. Xie Q, Li R, Wang YD, Su R, Lian J, Ren Y, Zheng W, Zhou X, Wang Y (2018) The in-depth residual strain heterogeneities due to an indentation and a laser shock peening for Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 714:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.07310.1016/j.msea.2017.12.073 ↗
7. As S, Skallerud B, Tveiten B (2008) Surface roughness characterization for fatigue life predictions using finite element analysis. Int J Fatigue 30(12):2200–2209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.02010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.020 ↗
8. Lai J, Huang H, Buising W (2016) Effects of microstructure and surface roughness on the fatigue strength of high strength steels. Procedia Structural Integrity 2:1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.15510.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.155 ↗
9. McKelvey SA, Fatemi A (2012) Surface finish effect on fatigue behavior of forged steel. Int J Fatigue 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.008 ↗
10. Gu C, Wang M, Bao YP, Wang FM, Lian JH (2019) Quantitative analysis of inclusion engineering on the fatigue property improvement of bearing steel. Metals 9(4):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/met904047610.3390/met9040476 ↗
11. Lian J, Yang H, Vajragupta N, Münstermann S, Bleck W (2014) A method to quantitatively upscale the damage initiation of dual-phase steels under various stress states from microscale to macroscale. Comput mater Sci 94:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.05110.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.051 ↗
12. Wu B, Vajragupta N, Lian J, Hangen U, Wechsuwanrnanee P, Muenstermann S (2017) Prediction of plasticity and damage initiation behaviour of C45E+N steel by micromechanical modelling. Mater Des 121:154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.03210.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.032 ↗
13. Liu W, Lian J, Aravas N, Münstermann S (2020) A strategy for synthetic microstructure generation and crystal plasticity parameter calibration of fine-grain-structured dual-phase steel. Int J Plast 126:102614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10.002 ↗
14. Xie Q, Lian J, Sidor JJ, Sun F, Yan X, Chen C, Liu T, Chen W, Yang P, An K, Wang Y (2020) Crystallographic orientation and spatially resolved damage in a dispersion-hardened Al alloy. Acta Mater 193:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.04910.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.049 ↗
15. Lian J, Sharaf M, Archie F, Münstermann S (2013) A hybrid approach for modelling of plasticity and failure behaviour of advanced high-strength steel sheets. Int J Damage Mech 22(2):188–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951243931910.1177/1056789512439319 ↗
16. Lian J, Wu J, Muenstermann S (2015) Evaluation of the cold formability of high-strength low-alloy steel plates with the modified Bai-Wierzbicki damage model. Int J Damage Mech 24(3):383–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951453758710.1177/1056789514537587 ↗
17. Benzerga AA, Leblond JB (2010). Ductile fracture by void growth to coalescence. Adv Appl Mech https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X ↗
18. Benzerga AA, Leblond J-B, Needleman A, Tvergaard V (2016) Ductile failure modeling. Int J Fract 201(1):29–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0142-610.1007/s10704-016-0142-6 ↗
19. Pineau A, Benzerga AA, Pardoen T (2016) Failure of metals I: brittle and ductile fracture. Acta Mater 107:424–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.03410.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.034 ↗
20. Bao YB, Wierzbicki T (2004) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46(1):81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
21. Besson J (2009) Continuum models of ductile fracture: a review. Int J Damage Mech 19(1):3–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678950910348210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
22. Clift SE, Hartley P, Sturgess CEN, Rowe GW (1990). Fracture prediction in plastic deformation processes. Int J Mech Sci https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C, 32, 110.1016/0020-7403(90)90148-C ↗
23. Cockcroft MG, Latham DJ (1968) Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Met 96:33–39
24. Ebnoether F, Mohr D (2013) Predicting ductile fracture of low carbon steel sheets: stress-based versus mixed stress/strain-based Mohr-coulomb model. Int J solids Struct 50(7-8):1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.02610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.026 ↗
25. Kailasam M, Castaneda PP (1998) A general constitutive theory for linear and nonlinear particulate media with microstructure evolution. J Mech Phys Solids 46(3):427–46510.1016/S0022-5096(97)00095-1 ↗
26. Oh SI, Chen CC, Kobayashi S (1979) Ductile Fracture in Axisymmetric Extrusion and Drawing .2. Workability in Extrusion and Drawing. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 101(1):36–4410.1115/1.3439471 ↗
27. Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol-Trans ASME 107(1):83–8910.1115/1.3225775 ↗
28. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of 3 metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
29. Lou Y, Huh H, Lim S, Pack K (2012) New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 49(25):3605–361510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.016 ↗
30. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35(2):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360120410.1115/1.3601204 ↗
31. Mohr D, Marcadet SJ (2015) Micromechanically-motivated phenomenological Hosford–coulomb model for predicting ductile fracture initiation at low stress triaxialities. Int J Solids Struct 67-68:40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.02410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.024 ↗
32. Oyane M, Sato T, Okimoto K, Shima S (1980) Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Work Technol 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-610.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-6 ↗
33. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17(3):201–21710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
34. Zhang ZL, Thaulow C, Ødegård J (2000) Complete Gurson model approach for ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00055-210.1016/S0013-7944(00)00055-2 ↗
35. Cao TS, Bobadilla C, Montmitonnet P, Bouchard PO (2015) A comparative study of three ductile damage approaches for fracture prediction in cold forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 216:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.00910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.009 ↗
36. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I–yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol-Trans ASME 99(1):2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
37. Khan AS, Liu HW (2012) A new approach for ductile fracture prediction on Al 2024-T351 alloy. Int J Plast 35:1–1210.1016/j.ijplas.2012.01.003 ↗
38. Cao TS, Mazière M, Danas K, Besson J (2015) A model for ductile damage prediction at low stress triaxialities incorporating void shape change and void rotation. Int J Solids Struct 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.03.00310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.03.003 ↗
39. Pardoen T (2006) Numerical simulation of low stress triaxiality ductile fracture. Comput Struct 84(26–27):1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.05.00110.1016/j.compstruc.2006.05.001 ↗
40. Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Devaux J (1993) Approximate models for ductile metals containing nonspherical voids - case of axiszmmetrical prolate ellipsoidal cavities. J Mech Phys Solids 41(11):1723–175410.1016/0022-5096(93)90029-F ↗
41. Gao X, Wang T, Kim J (2005) On ductile fracture initiation toughness: effects of void volume fraction, void shape and void distribution. Int J Solids Struct 42(18–19):5097–5117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.028 ↗
42. Nahshon K, Hutchinson JW (2008) Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. Eur J Mech A-Solids 27(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechso1.2007.08.00210.1016/j.euromechso1.2007.08.002 ↗
43. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane-strain conditions. Int J Fract 17(4):389–40710.1007/BF00036191 ↗
44. Tvergaard V (1982) On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18(4):237–25210.1007/BF00015686 ↗
45. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32(1):157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
46. Wen J, Huang Y, Hwang KC, Liu C, Li M (2005) The modified Gurson model accounting for the void size effect. Int J Plast 21(2):381–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.01.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2004.01.004 ↗
47. Xue L (2008) Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Eng Fract Mech 75(11):3343–3366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022 ↗
48. Zhou J, Gao X, Sobotka JC, Webler BA, Cockeram BV (2014) On the extension of the Gurson-type porous plasticity models for prediction of ductile fracture under shear-dominated conditions. Int J Solids Struct 51(18). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.028 ↗
49. Malcher L, Mamiya EN (2014) An improved damage evolution law based on continuum damage mechanics and its dependence on both stress triaxiality and the third invariant. Int J Plast 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2014.01.002 ↗
50. Teng X (2008) Numerical prediction of slant fracture with continuum damage mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 75(8):2020–2041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.001 ↗
51. Niazi MS, Wisselink HH, Meinders T, Huetink J (2012) Failure predictions for DP steel cross-die test using anisotropic damage. Int J damage Mech 21(5):713–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951140764610.1177/1056789511407646 ↗
52. Saanouni K (2006) Virtual metal forming including the ductile damage occurrence. J Mater Process Technol 177(1-3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.22610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.226 ↗
53. Brunig M, Chyra O, Albrecht D, Driemeier L, Alves M (2008) A ductile damage criterion at various stress triaxialities. Int J Plast 24(10):1731–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.001 ↗
54. Chow CL, Jie M (2009) Anisotropic damage-coupled sheet metal forming limit analysis. Int J damage Mech 18(4):371–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678950809754810.1177/1056789508097548 ↗
55. Li H, Fu MW, Lu J, Yang H (2011) Ductile fracture: experiments and computations. Int J Plast 27(2):147–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.001 ↗
56. Luo M, Dunand M, Mohr D (2012) Experiments and modeling of anisotropic aluminum extrusions under multi-axial loading - part II: ductile fracture. Int J plasticity 32-33:36–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.001 ↗
57. Novokshanov D, Döbereiner B, Sharaf M, Münstermann S, Lian J (2015) A new model for upper shelf impact toughness assessment with a computationally efficient parameter identification algorithm. Eng Fract Mech 148:281–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.07.06910.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.07.069 ↗
58. Liu W, Lian J, Münstermann S, Zeng C, Fang X (2020) Prediction of crack formation in the progressive folding of square tubes during dynamic axial crushing. Int J Mech Sci 176:105534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10553410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105534 ↗
59. Shen F, Münstermann S, Lian J (2020) Investigation on the ductile fracture of high-strength pipeline steels using a partial anisotropic damage mechanics model. Eng Fract Mech 227:106900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10690010.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106900 ↗
60. He J, Lian J, Golisch G, He A, Di Y, Münstermann S (2017) Investigation on micromechanism and stress state effects on cleavage fracture of ferritic-pearlitic steel at −196°C. Mater Sci Eng A 686:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.04210.1016/j.msea.2017.01.042 ↗
61. Suraratchai M, Limido J, Mabru C, Chieragatti R (2008) Modelling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy. Int J Fatigue 30(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.00310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.003 ↗
62. Paul SK (2013) Real microstructure based micromechanical model to simulate microstructural level deformation behavior and failure initiation in DP 590 steel. Mater Des 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.02310.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.023 ↗
63. Uthaisangsuk V, Münstermann S, Prahl U, Bleck W, Schmitz HP, Pretorius T (2011) A study of microcrack formation in multiphase steel using representative volume element and damage mechanics. Comput mater Sci 50(4):1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.08.00710.1016/j.commatsci.2010.08.007 ↗
64. Vajragupta N, Uthaisangsuk V, Schmaling B, Münstermann S, Hartmaier A, Bleck W (2012) A micromechanical damage simulation of dual phase steels using XFEM. Comput Mater Sci 54:271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.03510.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.035 ↗
65. Zhao YW, Tryon R (2004) Automatic 3-D simulation and micro-stress distribution of polycrystalline metallic materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193(36–38):3919–393410.1016/j.cma.2004.02.015 ↗
66. BSI BSI (1996) Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - surface texture: profile method - metrological characteristics of phase correct filters. Iso 11562
67. ISO (2011). ISO 16610-21:2011(en), Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Filtration — Part 21: Linear profile filters: Gaussian filters. iso
68. ISO (2015). ISO 16610-61:2015, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Filtration — Part 61: Linear areal filters: Gaussian filters. iso
69. Beuth (2009). DIN EN ISO 6892-1:2009–12 - Zugversuch - Teil 1: Prüfverfahren bei Raumtemperatur / tensile testing - part 1: method of test at room temperature. Beuth
70. Münstermann S, Langenberg P, Dahl W, Eisele U, Roos E (2004) Der Kurzrisseffekt bei der bruchmechanischen Prüfung. MP Materialprüfung 46(10):501–50510.3139/120.100616 ↗
71. ISO (2016). ISO 16610-31:2016, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Filtration — Part 31: Robust profile filters: Gaussian regression filters