journal article·2019-05Open access

Numerical simulation of metal forming processes with 3D adaptive Remeshing strategy based on a posteriori error estimation

Bessam Zeramdini, Camille Robert, Guenael Germain, Thomas Pottier

Abstract

In this work, a fully automated adaptive remeshing strategy, based on a tetrahedral element for 3D metal forming processes, was proposed in order to solve problems associated with the severe mesh distortion that occurs during the computation. The main idea is to use the h-type adaptive mesh in combination with an a-posteriori error estimator measured (by the energy norm) on each finite elements to locally control the mesh modification-as-needed. Once a new mesh is generated, all history-dependent variables must be carefully transferred between subsequent meshes. Therefore, several transfer techniques are described and compared. A special attention is given to restore the local mechanical equilibrium of the system with a new methodology. After presenting the necessary adaptive remeshing steps, some 3D analytic and numerical results using the proposed adaptive strategy are given to demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed equilibrated approach and to illustrate some practical characteristics of our remeshing process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Diez P, Calderon G (2007) Remeshing criteria and proper error representations for goal oriented h-adaptivity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 196(4-6):719–73310.1016/j.cma.2006.03.005 ↗
2. Ainsworth M, Oden JT (1997) A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 142(1-2):1–8810.1016/S0045-7825(96)01107-3 ↗
3. Verfurth R (1999) A review of a posteriori error estimation techniques for elasticity problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 176(1-4):419–44010.1016/S0045-7825(98)00347-8 ↗
4. Lo SH (1991) Volume discretization into tetrahedra-1. Verification and orientation of boundary surfaces. Comput Struct 39(5):493–50010.1016/0045-7949(91)90058-T ↗
5. Lo SH (1991) Volume discretization into tetrahedra-II. 3D triangulation by advancing front approach. Comput Struct 39(5):501–51110.1016/0045-7949(91)90059-U ↗
6. Dureisseix D, Bavestrello H (2006) Information transfer between incompatible finite element meshes: application to coupled thermo-viscoelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 85:6523–654110.1016/j.cma.2006.02.003 ↗
7. Zeramdini B, Robert C, Germain G, Pottier T (2016) Simulation of metal forming processes with a 3D adaptive remeshing procedure. AIP Conf Proceed. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496363610.1063/1.4963636 ↗
8. Srikanth A, Zabaras N (2000) Shape optimization and preform design in metal forming processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 190(13–14):1859–190110.1016/S0045-7825(00)00213-9 ↗
9. Kumar S, Fourment L, Guerdoux S (2015) Parallel, second-order and consistent remeshing transfer operators for evolving meshes with superconvergence property on surface and volume. Finite Elem Anal Des 93:70–8410.1016/j.finel.2014.09.002 ↗
10. Peric D, Hochard C, Dutko M, Owen DRJ (1996) Transfer operators for evolving meshes in small strain elasto-placticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 137(3-4):331–34410.1016/S0045-7825(96)01070-5 ↗
11. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery (SPR) and adaptive finite element. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 101(1-3):207–22410.1016/0045-7825(92)90023-D ↗
12. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimation. Part I: the recovery technique. Internat J Numer Methods Engrg 33(7):1331–136410.1002/nme.1620330702 ↗
13. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1992) The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimation. Part II: error estimates and adaptivity. Internat J Numer Methods Engrg 33(7):1365–138210.1002/nme.1620330703 ↗
14. Babuška I, Rheinbildt WC (1978) A posteriori error estimates for the finite element method. Internat J Numer Methods Engrg 12(10):1597–161510.1002/nme.1620121010 ↗
15. Ladevèze P, Coffignal G, Pelle J.P (1986) Accuracy of elastoplastic and dynamic analysis. In Babuška I, Zienkiewicz O.C, Gago J and Oliveira E.R de A, ch.11 Accuracy Estimates and Adaptive Refinements in Finite Element Computations, John Wiley & Sons Ltd pp 181–203
16. Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1987) A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineering analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):337–35710.1002/nme.1620240206 ↗
17. Ladevèze P, Pelle J.P (2004) Mastering calculation in linear and nonlinear mechanics, Berlin
18. Boussetta R, Fourment L (2004) A posteriori error estimation and three-dimensional adaptive remeshing: application to error control of non-steady metal forming simulations. AIP Conf Proc 712:2246–225110.1063/1.1766869 ↗
19. Boussetta R, Coupez T, Fourment L (2006) Adaptive remeshing based on a posteriori error estimation for forging simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 195(48-49):6626–664510.1016/j.cma.2005.06.029 ↗
20. Coorevits P, Bellenger E (2004) Alternative mesh optimality criteria for h-adaptive finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:2195–121510.1016/j.finel.2003.08.007 ↗
21. Ciarlet P.G (1978) The finite element method for elliptic problems. North-Holland publishing company, Amsterdam, New York, 45, 4
22. Khoei AR, Gharehbaghi SA, Tabarraie AR, Riahi A (2007) Error estimation, adaptivity and data transfer in enriched plasticity continua to analysis of shear band localization. Appl Math Model 31(6):983–100010.1016/j.apm.2006.03.021 ↗
23. Babuška I, Strouboulis T, Upadhyay CS, Gangaraj SK, Copps K (1994) Validation of a posteriori error estimators by numerical approach. Int J Numer Methods Engrg 37(7):1073–112310.1002/nme.1620370702 ↗
24. Wiberg NE, Abdulwahab F, Ziukas S (1994) Enhanced superconvergent patch recovery incorporating equilibrium and boundary conditions. Inter J for Numer Methods Engrg 37(20):3417–344010.1002/nme.1620372003 ↗
25. Liszka T, Orkisz J (1980) The finite differences method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied machanics. Comput Struct 11(1-2):83–9510.1016/0045-7949(80)90149-2 ↗
26. Liszka T (1984) An interpolation method for an irregular net of nodes. Int J Numer Methods Engrg 20(9):1599–161210.1002/nme.1620200905 ↗
27. Johnson G.R, Cook W.K (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains high strain rates and high temperatures. 7th international symposium on Balistics pp 541–547
28. Ayed Y, Germain G, Ammar A, Furet B (2016) Thermo-mechanical characterization of the Ti17 titanium alloy under extreme loading conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9476-510.1007/s00170-016-9476-5 ↗
29. Hu Y, Randolph MF (1998) H-adaptive FE analysis of elasto-plastic non-homogeneous soil with large deformation. Comput Geotech 23(1-2):61–8310.1016/S0266-352X(98)00012-3 ↗