Study of forming limit diagram (FLD) prediction of anisotropic sheet metals using Gurson model in M-K method
Source abstract
Abstract
This study uses the Marciniak and Kuczynski (M-K) method to present an analytical forming limit diagram (FLD) for sheet metals. The procedure for the analytical FLD prediction is described in detail and step-wise manner, and an algorithm is written using MATLAB. First, an appropriate algorithm is determined to establish the theoretical analyses, and various anisotropic yield functions, such as Hill’s 48, Barlat 89, and Hosford, are considered. The predicted FLDs are compared with experiments involving a typical AA6016-T4 aluminum alloy. Second, the Gurson model that considers damage growth is implemented when Hosford is the yield function, as Hosford criterion predicts the best comparable analytical FLD with experiments among the yield functions. Third, a parametric study is performed to investigate the effects of parameters on the FLD prediction. Results indicate that an extremely low value for the initial void volume fraction in the safe and groove zones has minimal effects on the FLD prediction. Lastly, the values of void volume fractions are calculated assuming no geometrical imperfections and the imperfection is because of higher void volume fraction in groove zone than that in safe zone.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Butuc MC, da Roch B, Gracio JJ, Ferreira Duarte J (2002) A more general model for forming limit diagrams prediction. J Mater Process Technol 125:213–21810.1016/S0924-0136(02)00315-1 ↗
2. Butuc M, Gracio J, Da Rocha AB (2003) A theoretical study on forming limit diagrams prediction. J Mater Process Technol 142(3):714–72410.1016/S0924-0136(03)00813-6 ↗
3. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A 193(1033):281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
4. Hill R. Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates. In mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society. 1979. Cambridge University Press10.1017/S0305004100055596 ↗
5. Barlat F, Maeda Y, Chung K, Yanagawa M, Brem JC, Hayashida Y, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S, Becker RC, Makosey S (1997) Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 45(11–12):1727–176310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00034-3 ↗
6. Ganjiani M, Assempour A (2007) An improved analytical approach for determination of forming limit diagrams considering the effects of yield functions. J Mater Process Technol 182(1–3):598–60710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.025 ↗
7. Hosford WF (1979) On yield loci of anisotropic cubic metals. in Proceedings of the Seventh North American Metal working Conference SME
8. Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Devaux J (1993) Approximate models for ductile metals containing non-spherical voids—case of axisymmetric prolate ellipsoidal cavities. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 41(11):1723–175410.1016/0022-5096(93)90029-F ↗
9. Lievers W, Pilkey A, Lloyd D (2003) The influence of iron content on the bendability of AA6111 sheet. Mater Sci Eng A 361(1):312–32010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00535-5 ↗
10. Lievers W, Pilkey A, Lloyd D (2004) Using incremental forming to calibrate a void nucleation model for automotive aluminum sheet alloys. Acta Mater 52(10):3001–300710.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.002 ↗
11. Chen ZT, Worswick MJ, Cinotti N, Pilkey AK, Lloyd D (2003) A linked FEM-damage percolation model of aluminum alloy sheet forming. Int J Plast 19(12):2099–212010.1016/S0749-6419(03)00061-5 ↗
12. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99(1):2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
13. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32(1):157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
14. Needleman A, Triantafyllidis N (Apr 1978) Void growth and local necking in biaxially stretched sheets. J Eng Mater Technol 100(2):164–16910.1115/1.3443466 ↗
15. Chelovian M, Kami A (2020) Study on formability of AISI 304 steel sheet using MK model and GTN damage criterion. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 50(1):71–79
16. Ragab A and Bayoumi SEA, Engineering solid mechanics: fundamentals and applications. 1998: CRC Press
17. Kim Y, Won S, Kim D, Son H (2001) Approximate yield criterion for voided anisotropic ductile materials. KSME international journal 15(10):1349–135510.1007/BF03185676 ↗
18. Kim YS, Won SY, Na KH (2003) Effect of material damage on forming limits of voided anisotropic sheet metals. Metall Mater Trans A 34(6):1283–129010.1007/s11661-003-0239-1 ↗
19. Kim YS, Son HS and Lee SR, Prediction of forming limits for voided anisotropic sheets using strain gradient dependent yield criterion. In key engineering materials. 2003. Trans Tech Publ10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.233-236.395 ↗
20. Hosseinia ME, Hosseinipour SJ, Bakhshi-Jooybari M (2017) Theoretical FLD prediction ased on M-K model using Gurson's plastic potential function for steel sheets. Procedia Engineering 183:119–12410.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.032 ↗
21. Son HS, Kim YS (2003) Prediction of forming limits for anisotropic sheets containing prolate ellipsoidal voids. Int J Mech Sci 45(10):1625–164310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.10.011 ↗
22. Barlat F, Lian K (1989) Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. International journal of plasticity 5(1):51–6610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
23. Geng L, Wagoner R (2002) Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback. Int J Mech Sci 44(1):123–14810.1016/S0020-7403(01)00085-6 ↗
24. Ganjiani M, Assempour A (2008) Implementation of a robust algorithm for prediction of forming limit diagrams. J Mater Eng Perform 17(1):1–610.1007/s11665-007-9121-4 ↗
25. Chu C, Needleman A (1980) Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets. Journal of Engineering Material and Technology 102(3):249–25610.1115/1.3224807 ↗
26. Tvergaard V (1982) On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18(4):237–25210.1007/BF00015686 ↗
27. Wu PD, Neale KW, Van Der Giessen E, Jain M, MacEwen SR, Makinde A (1998) Crystal plasticity forming limit diagram analysis of rolled aluminum sheets. Metall Mater Trans A 29(2):527–53510.1007/s11661-998-0134-x ↗
28. Ragab A, Saleh C, Zaafarani N (2002) Forming limit diagrams for kinematically hardened voided sheet metals. J Mater Process Technol 128(1–3):302–31210.1016/S0924-0136(02)00470-3 ↗
29. Shahzamanian MM (2018) Anisotropic gurson-tvergaard-needleman plasticity and DamageModel for finite element analysis of elastic-plastic problems. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 115(13):1527–155110.1002/nme.5906 ↗
30. Zaman TN (2008) Effects of strain path changes on damage evolution and sheet metal formability. MSc thesis, McMaster University