Environmental impact of process constrained topology optimization design on automotive component’ life
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The components’ lightweighting has been pursued, especially in the transport industry, for greenhouse gas reduction. Topology optimization, being able to allocate the material within a provided design space, is a mathematical method that can support the design of lightweight components, preserving, at the same time, their mechanical performances. In this paper, a standard shape of a component, specifically an automotive bracket, was topology optimized by estimating the impacts of the new designs from an eco-friendly point of view. A subtractive, an additive and a casting manufacturing process were considered as possible manufacturing routes achieving an optimized geometry of the component for each of them. The topology optimizations were performed considering each processes’ peculiarities, introduced as constraints. Same strength for a given set of loads and boundary conditions was the target of each analysis. The component’s lightening can be considered environmentally friendly just after assessing the impacts associated with all the stages of the product’ life cycle. Indeed, each phase of the product’ life cycle can be affected, differently, by the performed topology optimization taking into account the peculiarities of the employed manufacturing process. The overall considerations on the most environmentally safe strategies can, therefore, change according to the specificities of the optimized shapes. The topology optimization showed its utmost potentiality, from a sustainable point of view, if applied to additive manufacturing techniques for the advantages arisen by the capability to manufacture complex shapes benefiting also of reduction time process owing to less material to be deposited.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Umbrello D, Matsumura T, Arrazola PJ et al (2022) Mini symposium on cutting and machining: 25 years of ESAFORM activity. Int J Mater Form 15:35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01680-w10.1007/s12289-022-01680-w ↗
2. Ahn H, Gingerich MB, Hahnlen R et al (2021) Numerical modeling of mechanical properties of UAM reinforced aluminum hat sections for automotive applications. Int J Mater Form 14:917–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01607-310.1007/s12289-020-01607-3 ↗
3. Ingarao G, Deng Y, Marino R et al (2016) Energy and CO 2 life cycle inventory issues for aluminum based components: the case study of a high speed train window panel. J Clean Prod 126:493–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.07010.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.070 ↗
4. Gagliardi F, la Rosa AD, Filice L, Ambrogio G (2021) Environmental impact of material selection in a car body component – The side door intrusion beam. J Clean Prod 318 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12852810.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128528 ↗
5. Knez S, Štrbac S, Podbregar I (2022) Climate change in the Western Balkans and EU Green Deal: status, mitigation and challenges. Energy Sustain Soc 12:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00328-y10.1186/s13705-021-00328-y ↗
6. Rousseau M, Pabst T (2022) Topology optimization of in-pit codisposal of waste rocks and tailings to reduce advective contaminant transport to the environment. Struct Multidiscip Optim 65:168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03266-110.1007/s00158-022-03266-1 ↗
7. Upadhyayula VKK, Parvatker AG, Baroth A, Shanmugam K (2019) Lightweighting and electrification strategies for improving environmental performance of passenger cars in India by 2030: A critical perspective based on life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 209:1604–1613 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.15310.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.153 ↗
8. Luk JM, Kim HC, de Kleine RD et al (2018) Greenhouse gas emission benefits of vehicle lightweighting: Monte Carlo probabalistic analysis of the multi material lightweight vehicle glider. Transp Res D Transp Environ 62:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.02.00610.1016/j.trd.2018.02.006 ↗
9. Bian J, Mohrbacher H, Zhang J-S et al (2015) Application potential of high performance steels for weight reduction and efficiency increase in commercial vehicles. Adv Manuf 3:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-015-0102-910.1007/s40436-015-0102-9 ↗
10. Duriez E, Morlier J, Azzaro-Pantel C, Charlotte M (2022) Ecodesign with topology optimization. Procedia CIRP 109:454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.27810.1016/j.procir.2022.05.278 ↗
11. Lee AWL, Chung SY, Low JSC, Lu WF (2023) Beyond light weighting, adapting topology optimisation to support ecodesign. Procedia CIRP 116:366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.06210.1016/j.procir.2023.02.062 ↗
12. Habeeb HA, Wahab DA, Azman AH, Alkahari MR (2023) Design optimization method based on artificial intelligence (Hybrid Method) for repair and restoration using additive manufacturing technology. Metals (Basel) 13:490. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1303049010.3390/met13030490 ↗
13. Deal EG, Gailhofer P, Herold A et al (2021) The role of Artificial Intelligence in the European Green Deal. European Union. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses
14. DeBoer B, Nguyen N, Diba F, Hosseini A (2021) Additive, subtractive, and formative manufacturing of metal components: a life cycle assessment comparison. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115:413–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07173-510.1007/s00170-021-07173-5 ↗
15. Challa R, Kamath D, Anctil A (2022) Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US. J Environ Manage 308:114592 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11459210.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592 ↗
16. Ingarao G, Priarone PC (2020) A comparative assessment of energy demand and life cycle costs for additive- and subtractive-based manufacturing approaches. J Manuf Process 56:1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.009 ↗
17. Slamani M, Karabibene N, Chatelain J-F, Beauchamp Y (2021) Edge trimming of flax fibers and glass fibers reinforced polymers composite – An experimental comparative evaluation. Int J Mater Form 14:1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-021-01644-610.1007/s12289-021-01644-6 ↗
18. He B, Bi C, Li X et al (2023) Residual stresses and deformations of laser additive manufactured metal parts: a review. Int J Mater Form 16:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01729-w10.1007/s12289-022-01729-w ↗
19. Quaranta G, Haug E, Duval JL, Chinesta F (2020) Parametric evaluation of part distortion in additive manufacturing processes. Int J Mater Form 13:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-01462-310.1007/s12289-018-01462-3 ↗
20. Jalouli Z, Caillaud A, Artozoul J et al (2021) Modelling of shrinkage formation in casting by the phase field method. Int J Mater Form 14:885–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01602-810.1007/s12289-020-01602-8 ↗
21. Niu L, Liang Z, Tian T et al (2023) Simulation and experiment research on integrated casting and forging process of automobile control arm. Int J Mater Form 16:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01726-z10.1007/s12289-022-01726-z ↗
22. Aathif Akmal SM, Bharathiraja G (2022) Analysis of engine mount material for automotive vibration and noise reduction. Mater Today Proc 62:2235–2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.46210.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.462 ↗
23. Yu Y, Naganathan NG, Dukkipati RV (2001) A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems. Mech Mach Theory 36:123–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(00)00023-910.1016/S0094-114X(00)00023-9 ↗
24. Bassoli E, Defanti S, Tognoli E et al (2021) Design for additive manufacturing and for machining in the automotive field. Appl Sci 11:7559. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1116755910.3390/app11167559 ↗
25. Shih RH (2022) Learning Autodesk Inventor (2022) Autodesk Inventor. SDC Publications
26. Markforged (2020) Eiger user manual. https://support.markforged.com
27. Hsia SY, Su YH (2020) Zero waste process for direct forming process of nail spikes. Solid State Phenom 311:27–32. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.311.2710.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.311.27 ↗
28. Obrecht TP, Jordan S, Legat A et al (2021) An LCA methodolody for assessing the environmental impacts of building components before and after refurbishment. J Clean Prod 327:129527 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12952710.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129527 ↗
29. Althaus HJ, Bauer C, Doka B et al (2010) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. t report No. 3, v2.2. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf.
30. Ashby MF (2009) Materials and the Environment Eco-Informed Material Choice. Elsevier, Oxford
31. Liu ZY, Li C, Fang XY, Guo YB (2018) Energy Consumption in Additive Manufacturing of Metal Parts. Procedia Manuf 26:834–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.10410.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.104 ↗
32. Various authors, PRé Sustainability (2020). SimaPro database manual – Methods library. http://www.pre-sustainability.com/
33. Ingarao G, Priarone PC, Gagliardi F et al (2014) Environmental comparison between a hot extrusion process and conventional machining processes through a life cycle assessment approach. Key Eng Mater 622–623:103–110. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.10310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.103 ↗
34. Denkena B, Helmecke P, Hülsemeyer L (2014) New production technologies in aerospace industry - 5th machining innovations conference (MIC 2014) energy efficient machining with optimized coolant lubrication flow rates. Procedia CIRP 25–31:24 Garbsen, Germany10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.140 ↗
35. Gao C, Wolff S, Wang S (2021) Eco-friendly additive manufacturing of metals: Energy efficiency and life cycle analysis. J Manuf Syst 60:459–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.06.01110.1016/j.jmsy.2021.06.011 ↗
36. Cecchel S, Cornacchia G, Panvini A (2016) Cradle-to-gate impact assessment of a high-pressure die-casting safety-relevant automotive component. JOM 68:2443–2448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2046-310.1007/s11837-016-2046-3 ↗
37. Capuzzi S, Timelli G (2018) Preparation and melting of scrap in aluminum recycling: A review. Metals (Basel) 8:249. https://doi.org/10.3390/met804024910.3390/met8040249 ↗
38. van Straten B, Dankelman J, van der Eijk A, Horeman T (2021) A Circular Healthcare Economy; a feasibility study to reduce surgical stainless steel waste. Sustain Prod Consum 27:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.03010.1016/j.spc.2020.10.030 ↗
39. Gutowski V, Li S, Filippou C et al (2015) Rapid structural bonding of dissimilar lightweight materials: polyolefins, composites and metals. Conference: Plastics In Motion Dearborn, Michigan/USA
40. Alawa B, Chakma S (2022) Investigation in compression ignition engine performance using alternative fuels produced from waste packaging materials. Resour Conserv Recycl Adv 14:200075 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.20007510.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200075 ↗