journal article·2023-05Open access

The influence of the heat generation during deformation on the mechanical properties and microstructure of the selected TWIP steels

Magdalena Barbara Jabłońska, Katarzyna Jasiak, Karolina Kowalczyk, Mateusz Skwarski, Kinga Rodak, Zbigniew Gronostajski

Abstract

Abstract The TWIP (Twinning Induced Plasticity) steels are one of the most promising materials in reducing the weight of vehicles. Despite a lot of research on TWIP steel, there are some issues that are not explained enough. Due to the future use of TWIP steel and the manufacturing of the final part by metal forming, three issues still need to be clarified. The first one, which is the most important, is the increase of the temperature due to the conversion of the deformation work into heat. TWIP steel has a high limit strain, strength and lower conductivity than conventional steel, therefore the heat generation of TWIP steel is greater than for other materials. The second and third issues are combined. They concern the influence of V microadditions on the stress–strain curves, the strain hardening coefficient n and the strain rate sensitivity coefficient m under cold deformation conditions. These properties determine the cold formability of TWIP steels. In the research, two TWIP steels were used with and without V microadditions (MnAl and MnAl-V steel). The special methodology using strain and temperature measurement systems as well as light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were applied. Research shows a significant increase of the temperature in the material due to high plastic deformations as well as a high level of yield stress. In the neck area, for the highest strain rate of 0,1 s -1, at the moment of rupture, the temperature reaches more than 200 °C. The difference between the average temperature in the rupture area and the maximum temperature is equal to 100° C. Its high increase can lead e.g. to changes in the deformation mechanism from twinning to dislocation gliding, which is also connected with a worsened workability, and thus also energy consumption of the bodywork elements. MnAl-V steel has better or similar ductility for the deep drawing in comparison to MnAl steel at low strain rates for almost isothermal conditions (constant temperature during deformation). However the MnAl steel has better ductility for the larger strain rates over 0.1 s−1 then there is large heat concentration in a very narrow area for MnAl-V steel. The obtained results are very important from an application point of view. The strain rate sensitivity coefficient m of the steel MnAl has very low, and even negative, values, which can make the production of complicated drawpieces difficult. Higher values of the strain rate sensitivity coefficient are exhibited by steel MnAl-V, i.e. at the level of 0,05, which is almost constant in the whole range of the obtained deformations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Frómeta D et al (2021) Fracture resistance of advanced high-strength steel sheets for automotive applications. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 52(2):840–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-020-06119-y10.1007/s11661-020-06119-y ↗
2. Kuziak R, Kawalla R, Waengler S (2008) Advanced high strength steels for automotive industry. Arch Civ Mech Eng 8(2):103–11710.1016/S1644-9665(12)60197-6 ↗
3. Gronostajski Z, Niechajowicz A, Polak S (2010) Prospects for the use of new-generation steels of the ahss type for collision energy absorbing components. Arch Metall Mater 55:221–230
4. Raghavan KS, Sastri AS, Marcinkowski MJ (1969) Nature of work-hardening behavior in Hadfields manganese steel. Trans Metall Soc Aime 245(7):1569–1575
5. Remy L (1978) Kinetics of f.c.c. deformation twinning and its relationship to stress-strain, behaviour. Acta Metall 26(3):443–45110.1016/0001-6160(78)90170-0 ↗
6. Kim YG, Kim TW, Hong SB (1993) High strength formable automotive structural steel, In: New and Alternative Materials for the Automotive Industry,” in 26th International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, pp 269–276
7. Grässel O, Frommeyer G (1998) Effect of martensitic phase transformation and deformation twinning on mechanical properties of Fe-Mn-Si-Al steels. Mater Sci Technol 14(12):1213–1217. https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1998.14.12.121310.1179/mst.1998.14.12.1213 ↗
8. Reyes-Calderón F, Mejía I, Boulaajaj A, Cabrera JM (2013) Effect of microalloying elements (Nb, V and Ti) on the hot flow behavior of high-Mn austenitic twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steel. Mater Sci Eng, A 560:552–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.10110.1016/j.msea.2012.09.101 ↗
9. Frommeyer G, Brüx U (2006) Microstructures and mechanical properties of high-strength Fe-Mn-Al-C light-weight TRIPLEX steels. Steel Res Int 77(9–10):627–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.20060644010.1002/srin.200606440 ↗
10. Jabłońska MB (2014) Mechanical properties and fractographic analysis of high manganese steels after dynamic deformation tests. Arch Metall Mater 59(3):1193–1197. https://doi.org/10.2478/amm-2014-020710.2478/amm-2014-0207 ↗
11. Jabłońska MB, Kowalczyk K (2019) Microstructural aspects of energy absorption of high manganese steels. Procedia Manuf 27:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.04910.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.049 ↗
12. Śmiglewicz A, Jabłońska MB (2015) The effect of strain rate on the impact strength of the high-Mn steel. Metalurgia 54(4):631–634. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275886574. Accessed 22 Feb 2022
13. Kim J, Estrin Y, Beladi H, Kim S, Chin K, De Cooman BC (2010) Constitutive modeling of TWIP steel in uni-axial tension, vol 654–656. In: Nie J-F, Morton A (eds) Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publications, Stafa-Zurich, Stafa-Zurich, pp 270–27310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.654-656.270 ↗
14. Allain S, Chateau JP, Bouaziz O, Migot S, Bouaziz O (2010) Correlations between the calculated stacking fault energy, temperature and strain rate. Acta Mater 58:5129–514110.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.049 ↗
15. Lang D, Li Q, Huang X, Huang W (2021) Stacking fault energy and fcc→hcp transformation driving force in Fe-Mn-C-Cr-Si high manganese steels and experimental investigation. Mater Res Express 8(8):. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac1c3410.1088/2053-1591/ac1c34 ↗
16. Asgari S, El-Danaf E, Kalidindi SR, Doherty RD (1997) Strain hardening regimes and microstructural evolution during large strain compression of low stacking fault energy Fcc alloys that form deformation twins. Metall Mater Trans A 28:1781–179510.1007/s11661-997-0109-3 ↗
17. Salas-Reyes AE, Mejía I, Bedolla-Jacuinde A, Boulaajaj A, Calvo J, Cabrera JM (2014) Hot ductility behavior of high-Mn austenitic Fe-22Mn-1.5Al-1.5Si-0.45C TWIP steels microalloyed with Ti and V. Mater Sci Eng, A 611:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.07210.1016/j.msea.2014.05.072 ↗
18. Kozłowska A, Radwański K, Matus K, Samek L, Grajcar A (2021) Mechanical stability of retained austenite in aluminum-containing medium-Mn steel deformed at different temperatures. Arch Civ Mech Eng 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00177-810.1007/s43452-021-00177-8 ↗
19. Shen YF, Jia N, Misra RDK, Zuo L (2016) Softening behavior by excessive twinning and adiabatic heating at high strain rate in a Fe-20Mn-0.6C TWIP steel. Acta Mater 103:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.06110.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.061 ↗
20. Yang HK, Zhang ZJ, Dong FY, Duan QQ, Zhang ZF (2014) Strain rate effects on tensile deformation behaviors for Fe-22Mn-0.6C-(1.5Al) twinning-induced plasticity steel. Mater Sci Eng A 607:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.04310.1016/j.msea.2014.04.043 ↗
21. Shterner V, Timokhina IB, Beladi H (2016) On the work-hardening behaviour of a high manganese TWIP steel at different deformation temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 669:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.10410.1016/j.msea.2016.05.104 ↗
22. Gao Y, Xu C, He Z, Li L (2015) Response characteristics and adiabatic heating during high strain rate for TRIP steel and DP steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 22(1):48–5410.1016/S1006-706X(15)60008-5 ↗
23. Gronostajski Z, Niechajowicz A, Kuziak R, Krawczyk J, Polak S (2017) The effect of the strain rate on the stress- strain curve and microstructure of AHSS. J Mater Process Technol 242:246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.02310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.023 ↗
24. Szala J (2008) Application of computer picture analysis methods to quantitative assessment of structure in materials. Sci J Silesian Univ Technol Series Metall 7–167
25. Mazancová E, Mazanec K (2009) Stacking fault energy in high manganese alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 16
26. Adler PH, Olson GB, Owen WS (1986) Strain hardening of Hadfield manganese steel. Metall and Mater Trans A 17:1725–173710.1007/BF02817271 ↗
27. Dumay A, Chateau JP, Allain S, Migot S, Bouaziz O (2008) Influence of addition elements on the stacking-fault energy and mechanical properties of an austenitic Fe-Mn-C steel. Mater Sci Eng A 483–484(1-2 C):184–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.17010.1016/j.msea.2006.12.170 ↗
28. Olson GB, Cohen M (1976) A general mechanism of martensitic Nucleation= Part I. General concepts and the FCC HCP transformation. Metall Mater Trans A7:1905–1914
29. Niendorf T, Rüsing CJ, Frehn A, Chumlyakov YI, Maier HJ (2012) Deformation mechanisms in high-manganese steels showing twinning-induced plasticity: fine-grained material and single crystals at ambient and cryogenic temperatures. Scr Mater 67(11):875–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.08.01110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.08.011 ↗
30. Teledyne FLIR (2015) Use Low-Cost Materials to Increase Target Emissivity. https://www.flir.com/discover/rd-science/use-low-cost-materials-to-increase-target-emissivity/. Accessed 21 Feb 2022
31. Kocks F, Mecking H (2003) Physics and phenomenology of strain hardening: The FCC case. Prog Mater Sci 48:171–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-810.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗
32. Mintz B, Kang S, Qaban A (2021) The influence of grain size and precipitation and a boron addition on the hot ductility of a high Al, V containing TWIP steels. Mater Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 37(12):1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2021.197587610.1080/02670836.2021.1975876 ↗
33. Hollomon JH (1945) Tensile deformation. Trans Metall Soc AIME 162:268–290
34. Ludwik P (1909) Elemente der Technologischen Mechanik, vol 32. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-662-40293-1 ↗
35. Paul H, Maurice C, Driver JH (2010) Microstructure and microtexture evolution during strain path changes of an initially stable Cu single crystal. Acta Mater 58(8):2799–2813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.05510.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.055 ↗
36. Hong CS, Tao NR, Huang X, Lu K (2010) Nucleation and thickening of shear bands in nano-scale twin/matrix lamellae of a Cu-Al alloy processed by dynamic plastic deformation. Acta Mater 58(8):3103–3116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.04910.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.049 ↗