Predicting consolidation-induced wrinkles and their effects on composites structural performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The majority of high-performance composite parts are nowadays designed using advanced numerical simulations that are able to accurately predict a part’s strength and deformation, providing that the internal ply architecture and exact fibre orientation are known with sufficient accuracy. However, most parts have some deviation of the fibre orientation from the ‘as-designed’ geometry, leading to the simulation overestimating the component’s strength. Up until recently, the advancement of the process simulation tools has not been sufficient to allow knowledge of this fibre deviation before any part has been manufactured, thus leading to overly conservative designs and costly experimental optimisation of the manufacturing process to reduce fibre path defects. This results in additional cost, waste of material and increased fuel consumption (due to the unnecessary weight of the components). This paper shows how state-of-the-art composite manufacturing simulations of the autoclave consolidation process can predict and help to mitigate against out-of-plane wrinkle formation in components made from toughened UD prepregs and thus raise confidence in failure analyses predictions. The industry relevant case of a stepped laminate is used as an example. Model predictions for the internal ply geometries are quantitatively compared to micrograph images of real samples. It is then shown how the input of the simulated ply architecture helps improving the accuracy of the failure simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Potter K, Khan B, Wisnom MR, Bell T, Stevens J (2008) Variability, fibre waviness and misalignment in the determination of the properties of composite materials and structures. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 39:1343–135410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.016 ↗
2. Chun H-J, Shin J-Y, Daniel IM (2001) Effects of material and geometric nonlinearities on the tensile and compressive behavior of composite materials with fiber waviness. Compos Sci Technol 61(1):125–13410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00201-3 ↗
3. Mukhopadhyay S, Jones MI, Hallett SR (2015) Tensile failure of laminates containing an embedded wrinkle; numerical and experimental study. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 77:219–22810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.007 ↗
4. Mukhopadhyay S, Jones MI, Hallett SR (2015) Compressive failure of laminates containing an embedded wrinkle; experimental and numerical study. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 73:132–14210.1016/j.compositesa.2015.03.012 ↗
5. Lemanski SL, Wang J, Sutcliffe MPF, Potter KD, Wisnom MR (2013) Modelling failure of composite specimens with defects under compression loading. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 48:26–3610.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.007 ↗
6. Ferreira LM, Graciani E, París F (2016) Three dimensional finite element study of the behaviour and failure mechanism of non-crimp fabric composites under in-plane compression. Compos Struct 149:106–11310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.022 ↗
7. Nikishkov Y, Makeev A, Seon G (2013) Progressive fatigue damage simulation method for composites. Int J Fatigue 48:266–27910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.005 ↗
8. Mukhopadhyay S, Nixon-Pearson OJ, Hallett SR (2017) An experimental and numerical study on fatigue damage development in laminates containing embedded wrinkle defects. Int J Fatigue 107:1–1210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.008 ↗
9. Wilhelmsson D, Talreja R, Gutkin R, Asp LE (2019) Compressive strength assessment of fibre composites based on a defect severity model. Compos Sci Technol 181:10768510.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107685 ↗
10. Bender JJ, Hallett SR, Lindgaard E (2019) Investigation of the effect of wrinkle features on wind turbine blade sub-structure strength. Compos Struct 218:39–4910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.026 ↗
11. Bender JJ, Hallett SR, Lindgaard E (2019) Parametric study of the effect of wrinkle features on the strength of a tapered wind turbine blade sub-structure. Compos Struct 218:120–12910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.065 ↗
12. Pierce RS, Falzon BG (2017) Simulating resin infusion through textile reinforcement materials for the manufacture of complex composite structures. Engineering 3(5):596–60710.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.006 ↗
13. Boisse P, Colmar J, Hamila N, Naouar N, Steer Q (2018) Bending and wrinkling of composite fiber preforms and prepregs. A review and new developments Composites Part B 141:234–24910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.061 ↗
14. Pierce RS, Falzon BG, Thompson MC (2017) A multi-physics process model for simulating the manufacture of resin-infused composite aerostructures. Compos Sci Technol 149:269–27910.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.003 ↗
15. Verpoest I, Lomov SV (2005) Virtual textile composites software WiseTex: integration with micro-mechanical, permeability and structural analysis. Compos Sci Technol 65(15–16):2563–257410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.031 ↗
16. Kärger L, Bernath A, Fritz F, Galkin S, Magagnato D, Oeckerath A, Schön A, Henning F (2015) Development and validation of a CAE chain for unidirectional fibre reinforced composite components. Compos Struct 132:350–35810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.047 ↗
17. Kärger L, Galkin S, Zimmerling C, Dörr D, Linden J, Oeckerath A, Wolf K (2018) Forming optimisation embedded in a CAE chain to assess and enhance the structural performance of composite components. Compos Struct 192:143–15210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.041 ↗
18. Görthofer J, Meyer N, Dora Pallicity T, Schöttl L, Trauth A, Schemmann M, Hohberg M, Pinter P, Elsner P, Henning F, Hrymak A, Seelig T, Weidenmann K, Kärger L, Böhlke T (2019) Virtual process chain of sheet molding compound: development, validation and perspectives. Compos Part B 169:133–14710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.001 ↗
19. Aridhi A, Arfaoui M, Mabrouki T, Naouar N, Denis Y, Zarroug M, Boisse P (2019) Textile composite structural analysis taking into account the forming process. Compos Part B 166:773–78410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.047 ↗
20. Syerko E, Binetruy C, Comas-Cardona S, Leygue A (2017) A numerical approach to design dual-scale porosity composite reinforcements with enhanced permeability. Mater Des 131:307–32210.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.035 ↗
21. Yun M-Y, Simacek P, Binetruy C, Advani S (2018) Random field generation of stochastically varying through the thickness permeability of a plain-woven fabric. Compos Sci Technol 159:199–20710.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.035 ↗
22. Tifkitsis KI, Mesogitis TS, Struzziero G, Skordos AA (2018) Stochastic multi-objective optimisation of the cure process of thick laminates. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 112:383–39410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.015 ↗
23. Zobeiry N, Forghani A, Li C, Gordnian K, Thorpe R, Vaziri R, Fernlund G, Poursartip A Multiscale characterization and representation of composite materials during processing. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 374(2071):2015027810.1098/rsta.2015.0278 ↗
24. Ding A, Li S, Wang J, Ni A (2017) A new analytical solution for spring-in of curved composite parts. Compos Sci Technol 142:30–4010.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.024 ↗
25. Ding A, Wang J, Ni A, Li S (2019) A new analytical solution for cure-induced spring-in of L-shaped composite parts. Compos Sci Technol 171:1–1210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.004 ↗
26. Baran I, Cinar K, Ersoy N, Akkerman R, Hattel JH (2016) A review on the mechanical modeling of composite manufacturing processes. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 1-31
27. Hubert P, Vaziri R, Poursartip A (1999) A two-dimensional flow model for the process simulation of complex shape composite laminates. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1–2610.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990110)44:1<1::AID-NME481>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
28. Hubert P, Poursartip A (1998) A review of flow and compaction modelling relevant to thermoset matrix laminate processing. J Reinf Plast Compos 17:286–31810.1177/073168449801700402 ↗
29. Hubert P (1996) Aspect of flow and compaction of laminated composite shapes during cure. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia
30. Hubert P, Poursartip A (2001) Aspects of the compaction of composite angle laminates: an experimental investigation. J Compos Mater 35(1):2–2610.1177/002199801772661849 ↗
31. Ghnatios C, Abisset-Chavanne E, Binetruy C, Chinesta F, Advani S (2016) 3d modeling of squeeze flow of multiaxial laminates. Journal of Non-Newton Fluid Mechanics 234:188–20010.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.06.004 ↗
32. Sorba G, Binetruy C, Leygue A, Comas-Cardona S (2017) Squeeze flow in heterogeneous unidirectional discontinuous viscous prepreg laminates: experimental measurement and 3D modelling. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 103:196–20710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.007 ↗
33. Hautefeuille A, Comas-Cardona S, Binetruy C (2019) Mechanical signature and full-field measurement of flow-induced large in-plane deformation of fibrous reinforcements in composite processing. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 118:213–22210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.030 ↗
34. Belnoue JP-H, Nixon-Pearson OJ, Ivanov DS, Hallett SR (2016) A novel hyper-viscoelastic model for consolidation of toughened prepregs under processing conditions. Mech Mater 97:118–13410.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.019 ↗
35. Nixon-Pearson OJ, Belnoue JP-H, Ivanov S, Potter KD, Hallett SR (2017) An experimental investigation of the consolidation behaviour of uncured prepregs under processing conditions. J Compos Mater 51(13):1911–192410.1177/0021998316665681 ↗
36. Hexcel® (2016) HexPly® 8552 Epoxy Marix Product Data, www.hexcel.com/user_area/content_media/raw/HexPly_8552_eu_DataSheet.pdf
37. Hexcel® (2015) HexPly® M21 Epoxy Marix Product Data, www.hexcel.com/user_area/content_media/raw/HexPly_M21_global_DataSheet.pdf
38. Belnoue JP-H, Mesogitis T, Nixon-Pearson OJ, Kratz J, Ivanov DS, Partridge IK, Potter KD, Hallett SR (2017) Understanding and predicting defect formation in automated fibre placement pre-preg laminates. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 102:196–20610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.008 ↗
39. Belnoue JP-H, Nixon-Pearson OJ, Thompson AJ, Ivanov DS, Potter KD, Hallett SR (2018) Consolidation-driven defect generation in thick composite parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(7):07100610.1115/1.4039555 ↗
40. Krueger R, Cvitkovich MK, O’Brien TK, Minguet PJ (2000) Testing and analysis of composite skin/stringer Debonding under multi-axial loading. J Compos Mater 34(15):1263–130010.1177/002199830003401502 ↗
41. Belnoue JP-H, Hallett SR (2016) Cohesive/adhesive failure interaction in ductile adhesive joints part I: a smeared-crack model for cohesive failure. Int J Adhes Adhes 68:359–36810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.009 ↗
42. Belnoue JP-H, Hallett SR (2016) Cohesive/adhesive failure interaction in ductile adhesive joints part II: quasi-static and fatigue analysis of double lap-joint specimens subjected to through-thickness compressive loading. Int J Adhes Adhes 68:369–37810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.010 ↗
43. Campbell FC (2004) Adhesive bonding and integrally Cocured structure: a way to reduce assembly costs through parts integration. Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, Elsevier Science10.1016/B978-185617415-2/50009-5 ↗
44. Wang JTS, Bigger SB (1994) Skin-stiffener interface stresses in composite stiffened panels. NASA Contractor Report 172261
45. Falzon BG, Davies GAO, Greenhalgh E (2001) Failure of thick-skinned stiffener runout sections loaded in uniaxial compression. Compos Struct 53:223–23310.1016/S0263-8223(01)00006-X ↗
46. Balzani C, Wagner W (2010) Numerical treatment of damage propagation in axially compressed composite airframe panels. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 10(4):683–70310.1142/S0219455410003683 ↗
47. Greenhalgh E, Hiley M (2003) The assessment of novel materials and processes for the impact tolerant design of stiffened composite aerospace structures. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 34(2):151–16110.1016/S1359-835X(02)00188-4 ↗
48. Mouritz AP (2007) Review of Z-pinned composite laminates. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 38:2383–239710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.016 ↗
49. Dell’Anno G, Treiber JWG, Partridge IK (2016) Manufacturing of composite parts reinforced through-thickness by tufting. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 37:262–27210.1016/j.rcim.2015.04.004 ↗
50. Akterskaia M, Jansen E, Hallett SR, Weaver P, Rolfes R (2018) Analysis of skin-stringer debonding in composite panels through a two-way global-local method. Compos Struct 202:1280–129410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.064 ↗
51. Limbert G, Middleton J (2004) A transversely isotropic viscohyperelastic material application to the modeling of biological soft connective tissues. Int J Solids Struct 41:237–426010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.057 ↗
52. Harrison P, Thije RT, Akkerman R, Long AC (2010) Characterising and modelling tool-ply friction of viscous textile composites. World Journal of Engineering 7(1):5–22
53. Liang B, Hamila N, Peillon M, Boisse P (2014) Analysis of thermoplastic Prepreg bending stiffness during manufacturing and of its influence on wrinkling simulations. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 67:111–12210.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.020 ↗
54. Xu X, Wisnom MR, Li X, Hallett SR (2015) A numerical investigation into size effects in Centre-notched quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Sci Technol 111:32–3910.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.001 ↗
55. Mi Y, Crisfield MA, Davies GAO, Hellweg HB (1998) Progressive delamination using interface elements. J Compos Mater 32:1246–127210.1177/002199839803201401 ↗
56. Zhu T-L (1993) A reliability-based safety factor for aircraft composite structures. Comput Struct 48(4):745–74810.1016/0045-7949(93)90269-J ↗
57. Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ, Li S, Smith PA (2014) The World-Wide Failure Exercises: How Can Composites Design and Manufacture Communities Build Their Strength. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Composite Materials (ECCM16), Seville