journal article·2010-03

On the strain inhomogeneity in drawn copper wires

G. H. Hasani, R. Mahmudi, A. Karimi-Taheri

Publisher page

Abstract

Three different wire drawing schedules were attempted to examine the effects of reduction of area, die-angle and friction coefficient on the strain inhomogeneity of drawn copper wires. The microhardness distribution was studied over the transverse and longitudinal cross-sections. Inhomogeneity factor (I.F.) curves; I.F. = f(r), I.F. = g(2α) and I.F. = h(μ) were determined from the measurements. The results indicate that less strain inhomogeneity is achieved in drawing wires through dies with low angle, low friction coefficient and high reduction of area. Despite the variation in reduction of area and die-angle, the strain was distributed evenly at the center of the drawn wires. Contrary to the existing theoretical models, inhomogeneity factor versus deformation zone geometry parameter (∆) was approximated by a second order polynomial curve and not a linear relationship, as was previously postulated. A new relationship was also proposed to relate the I.F. to the calculated redundant work factor Φ.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Jo HH, Lee SK, Kim MA, Kim BM (2002) Pass schedule design system in the dry wire-drawing process of high carbon steel. J Eng Manufacture 216:365–37310.1243/0954405021520030 ↗
2. Avitzur B (1968) Metal forming: process and analysis. McGraw Hill, New York
3. Riendeau MP, Mataya MC, Matlock DK (1997) Controlled drawing to produce desirable hardness and microstructural gradients in alloy 302 wire. Metall Mater Trans A 28:363–37510.1007/s11661-997-0138-y ↗
4. Castro ALR, Campos HB, Cetlin PR (1996) Influence of die semi-angle on mechanical properties of single and multiple pass drawn copper. J Mat Proc Tech 60:179–8210.1016/0924-0136(96)02325-4 ↗
5. Campos HB, Cetlin PR (1998) The influence of die semi-angle and of the coefficient of friction on the uniform tensile elongation of drawn copper bars. J Mat Proc Tech 80–81:388–39110.1016/S0924-0136(98)00117-4 ↗
6. Reed-Hill RE, Abbaschian R (1991) Physical metallurgy principles. PWS, Boston
7. Sefrioui Z, Menendez JL, Cebollada A, Briones F, Hernando A (2004) Strain-inhomogeneity effect on magnetization and low-temperature resistivity of epiataxial Fe (001) thin films. J Magnet Magnetic Mat 268:24–2810.1016/S0304-8853(03)00413-X ↗
8. Yuan DW, Pollock MJ, Kajuck J (1997) Drawing of Ag-clad Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 super conductor wires. J Supercond Sci Tech 10:52–5710.1088/0953-2048/10/1/008 ↗
9. Rajan K, Petkie R (1998) Microstructure and anisotropy in wire drawn copper. J Mat Sci Engg A 257:185–9710.1016/S0921-5093(98)00838-7 ↗
10. Sadok L, Luksza J, Majta J (1994) Inhomogeneity of mechanical properties in stainless steel rods after drawing. J Mat Proc Tech 44:129–14410.1016/0924-0136(94)90044-2 ↗
11. Petruska J, Janicek L (2003) On the evaluation of strain inhomogeneity by hardness measurement of formed products. J Mat Proc Tech 143–144:300–30510.1016/S0924-0136(03)00478-3 ↗
12. Luksza J, Majta J, Burdek M, Ruminski M (1998) Modelling and measurements of mechanical behavior in multi-pass drawing process. J Mat Proc Tech 80–81:398–40510.1016/S0924-0136(98)00119-8 ↗
13. Backofen WA (1972) Deformation processing. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
14. El-Domiaty A, Kassab SZ (1996) Temperature rise in wire-drawing. J Mat Proc Tech 83:72–8310.1016/S0924-0136(98)00045-4 ↗
15. Dixit US, Dixit PM (1995) An analysis of the steady-state wire drawing of strain-hardening Materials. J Mater Proc Tech 47:201–22910.1016/0924-0136(95)85000-7 ↗
16. Hosford W, Caddell R (1983) Metal forming—mechanics and metallurgy. Prentice-Hall, Englewoodcliffs
17. Caddell RM, Atkins AG (1968) The influence of redundant work when drawing rods through conical dies. Trans ASME B, J Eng Ind 90:411–41910.1115/1.3604653 ↗
18. Chin JK, Steif PS (1995) A computational study of strain inhomogeneity in wire drawing. Int J Mach Tools Manufact 35:1087–109810.1016/0890-6955(95)90403-9 ↗