journal article·2017-10

Inverse analysis procedure to determine flow stress and friction data for finite element modeling of machining

Rodolfo Franchi, Antonio Del Prete, Domenico Umbrello

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper describes an inverse procedure to determine the constitutive constants and the friction conditions in the machining processes using Finite Elements (FE) simulations. In general, the FE modeling of machining processes is an effective tool to analyze the materials machinability under different cutting conditions. However, the use of reliable rheological and friction models represents the basis of a correct numerical investigation. The presented inverse procedure was based on the numerical results obtained using a commercial FE code and was developed considering a specific optimization problem, in which the objective functions that have to be minimized is the experimental/numerical error. This problem was performed by a routine developed in a commercial optimization software. In order to verify the goodness and the robustness of the methodology, it was applied on a Super Duplex Stainless Steel (SDSS) and on an Austenitic Stainless Steel (AUSS) orthogonal machining processes. This work, then, was focused on the identification of the Johnson-Cook (JC) coefficients (A,B,C, n and m) and on the calibration of a Coulomb friction model, in the specific cases of the SAF2507 SDSS and of an AISI 316 Based AUSS Alloy (AISI 316 ASBA). The identification phases were performed considering forces and temperatures experimental data, collected in two specific experimental tasks in which different orthogonal cutting tests were carried out under different cutting parameters conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D, Davies M, Jawahir IS (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):695–71810.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.006 ↗
2. Outeiro JC, Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R, Jawahir IS (2015) “Evaluation of Numerical Models for Predicting Surface Integrity in Metal Machining,”. Mach Sci Technol 19/2(2):183–21610.1080/10910344.2015.1018537 ↗
3. Jawahir IS, Brinksmeier E, M’Saoubi R, Aspinwall DK, Outeiro JC, Meyer D, Umbrello D, Jayal AD (2011) Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(2):603–62610.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002 ↗
4. Umbrello D (2013) Analysis of the white layers formed during machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel under dry and cryogenic cooling conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5):633–64210.1007/s00170-012-4073-8 ↗
5. Rotella G, Dillon OW, Umbrello D, Settineri L, Jawahir IS (2013) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in turning of AA7075-T651 alloy. J Manuf Process 15(1):87–9510.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.005 ↗
6. Wang Q, Liu Z, Wang B, Song Q, Wan Y (2016.) “Evolutions of grain size and micro-hardness during chip formation and machined surface generation for Ti-6Al-4 V in high-speed machining,”. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(9):1725–173610.1007/s00170-015-7508-1 ↗
7. Özel T, Zeren E (2004) Determination of work material flow stress and friction for FEA of machining using orthogonal cutting tests. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:1019–102510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.162 ↗
8. Filice L, Micari F, Rizzuti S, Umbrello D (2007) A critical analysis on the friction modelling in orthogonal machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3–4):704–714
9. Melkote SN, Liu R, Fernandez-Zelaia P, Marusich T (2015) A physically based constitutive model for simulation of segmented chip formation in orthogonal cutting of commercially pure titanium. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(1):65–6810.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.060 ↗
10. Sartkulvanich P, Lopez AM, Rodriguez C, Altan T (2008) “inverse analysis methodology to determine flow stress data for finite element modeling of machining,” in 11th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operation. Gaithersburg, MD USA
11. Pujana J, Arrazola PJ, M’Saoubi R, Chandrasekaran H (2007) Analysis of the inverse identification of constitutive equations applied in orthogonal cutting process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:2153–216110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.04.012 ↗
12. Klocke F, Lung D, Buchkremer S (2013) “inverse identification of the constitutive equation of Inconel 718 and AISI 1045 from FE machining simulations,” in 14th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations (CIRP CMMO). Procedia CIRP 8:212–21710.1016/j.procir.2013.06.091 ↗
13. D. Ulutan and T. Özel, (2013) “Determination of Constitutive Material Model Parameters in FE-Based Machining Simulations of Ti-6Al-4 V and IN-100 Alloys: An Inverse Methodology,” Proceedings of NAMRI/SME, vol. 41
14. Daoud M, Jomaa W, Chatelain JF, Bouzid A (2015) A machining-based methodology to identify material constitutive law for finite element simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:2019–203310.1007/s00170-014-6583-z ↗
15. Franchi R, Del Prete A, Umbrello D, Mariano E (2015) Inverse analysis procedure to determine flow stress and friction data for metal cutting finite element modeling. Key Eng Mater 651-653:1345–135010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1345 ↗
16. Maranhão C, Davim JP (2010) Finite element modelling of machining of AISI 316 steel: numerical simulation and experimental validation. Simul Model Pract Theory 18:139–15610.1016/j.simpat.2009.10.001 ↗
17. G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, (1983) “A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, vol 54, p 1, 1983
18. E. J. Kansa, (1999) “Motivation for using Radial Basis Functions to solve PDEs, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Embry-Riddle Aeronatical University,” [Online]. Available: www.rbf-pde.org/kansaweb.html .
19. Miki M, Hiroyasu T, Kaneko M, Hatanaka K (1999) “A Parallel Genetic Algorithm with Distributed Environment scheme,”. EEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern, 1:695–700
20. Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC (2007) The influence of Johnson–cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316 L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:462–47010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.06.006 ↗