Characterization of damage in forward rod extruded parts
Source abstract
Abstract
In addition to strain hardening and residual stress, damage influences the product performance of forward rod extruded parts. Damage is usually neglected and difficult to quantify. The evolution of ductile damage in metal forming is closely correlated to the load path. An experimental approach using automated energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) particle analysis in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is used to successfully quantify the void area fraction and obtain information on ductile damage. The method is performed on forward rod extruded 16MnCrS5 workpieces with varying extrusion strains and shoulder opening angles (and thus varying underlying load paths). The quantified damage is directly correlated to the load path, which can be described by the stress triaxiality evolution during forming. Density measurements were performed to further validate the results. By observing the change of strain-weighted stress triaxiality and maximum stress triaxiality, it is shown, that the maximum stress triaxiality is the decisive parameter enabling void nucleation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Lange K, Kammerer M, Pöhlandt K, Schöck J (2008) Fließpressen. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-30910-9 ↗
2. Jennison HC (1930) Certain types of defects in copper wire caused by improper dies and drawing practice. AIME Trans 89:121–139
3. Avitzur B (1968) Analysis of central bursting defects in extrusion and wire drawing. J Eng Ind 90(1):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360460810.1115/1.3604608 ↗
4. Zimerman Z, Avitzur B (1970) Analysis of the effect of strain hardening on central bursting defects in drawing and extrusion. J Eng Ind 92(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.342769810.1115/1.3427698 ↗
5. Soyarslan C, Tekkaya AE, Akyuz U (2008) Application of continuum damage mechanics in discontinuous crack formation: forward extrusion chevron predictions. Zamm 88(6):436–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.20080001310.1002/zamm.200800013 ↗
6. Zimerman Z, Darlington H, Kottcamp EH (1971) Selection of operating parameters to prevent central bursting defects during cold extrusion. In: Metal forming: interrelation between theory and practice. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 47–6210.1007/978-1-4615-1757-3_2 ↗
7. Rice JR, Trace DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17(3):201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
8. Tekkaya AE, Ben Khalifa N, Hering O, Meya R, Myslicki S, Walther F (2017) Forming-induced damage and its effects on product properties. CIRP Ann 66(1):281–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.11310.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.113 ↗
9. Zapara M, Augenstein E, Helm D (2014) Prediction of damage in cold bulk forming processes. Pamm 14(1):1037–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.20141049210.1002/pamm.201410492 ↗
10. Lemaitre J, Dufailly J (1987) Damage measurements. Eng Fract Mech 28(5):643–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(87)90059-210.1016/0013-7944(87)90059-2 ↗
11. Tasan CC, Hoefnagels JPM, Geers MGD (2009) A critical assessment of indentation-based ductile damage quantification. Acta Mater 57(17):4957–4966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.05710.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.057 ↗
12. Tasan CC, Hoefnagels JPM, Geers MGD (2010) Indentation-based damage quantification revisited. Scr Mater 63(3):316–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.01810.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.018 ↗
13. Tasan CC, Hoefnagels JPM, Geers MGD (2009) A brittle-fracture methodology for three-dimensional visualization of ductile deformation micromechanisms. Scr Mater 61(1):20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.04910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.049 ↗
14. Shi YW, Barnby JT (1984) Void nucleation during tensile deformation of a C-Mn structural steel. Int J Fract 25(2):143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0114155710.1007/bf01141557 ↗
15. Cao TS, Maire E, Verdu C, Bobadilla C, Lasne P, Montmitonnet P, Bouchard PO (2014) Characterization of ductile damage for a high carbon steel using 3D X-ray micro-tomography and mechanical tests – application to the identification of a shear modified GTN model. Comput Mater Sci 84:175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.006 ↗
16. Tasan CC, Hoefnagels JPM, Geers MGD (2012) Identification of the continuum damage parameter: an experimental challenge in modeling damage evolution. Acta Mater 60(8):3581–3589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.01710.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.017 ↗
17. Raeymaekers B, Van Espen P, Adams FJMA (1984) The morphological characterization of particles by automated scanning electron microscopy. Microchim Acta 83(5):437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0145145410.1007/bf01451454 ↗
18. Laskin A, JPJAC C (2001) Automated single-particle SEM/EDX analysis of submicrometer particles down to 0.1 μm. Anal Chem 73(5):1023–102910.1021/ac0009604 ↗
19. Mohr D (2015) Basic notions of fracture mechanics - ductile fracture [WWW Document]. ETH Zurich, Dep. Mech. Process Eng. Comput. Model. Mater. Manuf
20. Hering O, Kolpak F, Tekkaya AE (2019) Flow curves up to high strains considering load reversal and damage. Int J Mater Form 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-01466-z10.1007/s12289-018-01466-z ↗
21. Meya R, Kusche C, Löbbe C, Al-Samman T, Korte-Kerzel S, Tekkaya A (2019) Global and high-resolution damage quantification in dual-phase steel bending samples with varying stress states. Metals 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/met903031910.3390/met9030319 ↗
22. Nadolski D (2018) Einfluss des Herstellungsverfahrens und der Wärmebehandlung auf das Verzugsverhalten unterschiedlicher Bauteilgeometrien. Shaker, Aachen
23. Spitzig WA, Sober RJ, Richmond O (1975) Pressure dependence of yielding and associated volume expansion in tempered martensite. Acta Metall Mater 23(7):885–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(75)90205-910.1016/0001-6160(75)90205-9 ↗