journal article·2012-09

Influence of out-of-plane compression stress on limit strains in sheet metals

Morteza Nurcheshmeh, Daniel E. Green

Publisher page

Abstract

The prediction of the forming limits of sheet metals typically assumes plane stress conditions that are really only valid for open die stamping or processes with negligible out-of-plane stresses. In fact, many industrial sheet metal forming processes lead to significant compressive stresses at the sheet surface, and therefore the effects of the through-thickness stress on the formability of sheet metals cannot be ignored. Moreover, predictions of forming limit curves (FLC) that assume plane stress conditions may not be valid when the forming process involves non-negligible out-of-plane stresses. For this reason a new model was developed to predict FLC for general, three-dimensional stress states. Marciniak and Kuczynski (Int J Mech Sci 9:609-620, 1967) first proposed an analytical method to predict the FLC in 1967, known as the MK method, and this approach has been used for decades to accurately predict FLC for plane stress sheet forming applications. In this work, the conventional MK analysis was extended to include the through-thickness principal stress component (σ3), and its effect on the formability of different grades of sheet metal was investigated in terms of the ratio of the third to the first principal stress components (\( \beta = {{{{\sigma_3}}} \left/ {{{\sigma_1}}} \right.} \)). The FLC was predicted for plane stress conditions (β = 0) as well as cases with different compressive through-thickness stress values (β ≠ 0) in order to study the influence of β on the FLC in three-dimensional stress conditions. An analysis was also carried out to determine how the sensitivity of the FLC prediction to the through-thickness stress component changes with variations in the strain hardening coefficient, in the strain rate sensitivity, in plastic anisotropy, in grain size and in sheet thickness. It was found that the out-of-plane stress always has an effect on the position of the FLC in principal strain space. However, the analysis also showed that among the factors considered in this paper, the strain hardening coefficient has the most significant effect on the dependency of FLC to the through-thickness stress, while the strain rate sensitivity coefficient has the least influence on this sensitivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K (1967) Limit strains in processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci 9:609–62010.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5 ↗
2. Keeler SP, Backofen WA (1963) Plastic instability and fracture in sheets stretched over rigid punches. ASM Trans 56:25–48
3. Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming in the press shop. SAE technical paper 68009310.4271/680093 ↗
4. Azrin M, Backofen WA (1970) The deformation and failure of a biaxially stretched sheet. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 1:2857–286510.1007/BF03037824 ↗
5. Sowerby R, Duncan JL (1971) Failure in sheet metal in biaxial tension. Int J Mech Sci 13:217–22910.1016/0020-7403(71)90004-X ↗
6. Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K, Pokora T (1973) Influence of the plastic properties of a material on the forming limit diagram for sheet metal in tension. Int J Mech Sci 15:789–80510.1016/0020-7403(73)90068-4 ↗
7. Ghosh AK (1977) A numerical analysis of the tensile test for sheet metals. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 8A:1221–123210.1007/BF02643836 ↗
8. Butuc MC, Gracio JJ, Da Rocha AB (2006) An experimental and theoretical analysis on the application of stress-based forming limit criterion. Int J Mech Sci 48:414–42910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.11.007 ↗
9. Yoshida K, Kuwabara T, Kuroda M (2007) Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal. Int J Plast 23:361–38410.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.005 ↗
10. Nurcheshmeh M, Green DE (2011) Investigation on the strain-path dependency of stress-based forming limit curves. Int J Mater Form 4(1):25–3710.1007/s12289-010-0989-4 ↗
11. Gotoh M, Chung T, Iwata N (1995) Effect of out-of-plane stress on the forming limit strain of sheet metals. JSME Int J Ser A 38:123–132
12. Smith LM, Averill RC, Lucas JP, Stoughton TB, Matin PH (2003) Influence of transverse normal stress on sheet metal formability. Int J Plast 19:1567–158310.1016/S0749-6419(02)00035-9 ↗
13. Banabic D, Soare S (2008) On the effect of the normal pressure upon the forming limit strains. Proceedings of NUMISHEET, 199–204
14. Molaei B (1999) Strain path effects on sheet metal formability, PHD thesis
15. Hwang Y-M, Lin Y-K, Chuang H-C (2009) Forming limit diagrams of tubular materials by bulge tests. J Mater Process Technol 209:5024–503410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.026 ↗
16. Kim J, Kim S-W, Song W-J, Kang B-S (2005) Analytical and numerical approach to prediction of forming limit in tube hydroforming. Int J Mech Sci 47:1023–103710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.011 ↗
17. Stachowicz F (1988) Effect of annealing temperature on plastic flow properties and forming limit diagrams of titanium and titanium alloy sheets. Trans Jpn Inst Met 29:484–49310.2320/matertrans1960.29.484 ↗
18. Sing WM, Rao KP (1995) Influence of material properties on sheet metal formability limits. J Mater Process Technol 48:35–4110.1016/0924-0136(94)01630-J ↗
19. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Oxford University Press
20. Banabic D, Bunge HJ, Pöhlandt K, Tekkaya AE (2000) Formability of metallic materials. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-662-04013-3 ↗
21. Green DE (2003) Experimental determination of tube forming limits. In: Siegert K (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on hydroforming. University of Stuttgart, Fellbach, pp 299–312
22. Patterson E, Brailly P, Burguete R, Hack E, Siebert T, Whelan M (2007) A challenge for high-performance full field strain measurement systems. Strain 43:167–18010.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00344.x ↗
23. Patterson E, Hack E, Brailly P, Burguete RL, Saleem Q, Siebert T, Tomlinson RA, Whelan MP (2007) Calibration and evaluation of optical systems for full-field strain measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 45:550–56410.1016/j.optlaseng.2006.08.012 ↗
24. Hung YY, Ho HP (2005) Shearography: an optical measurement technique and applications, shearography: an optical measurement technique and applications. Mater Sci Eng 49:61–8710.1016/j.mser.2005.04.001 ↗
25. Francis D, James SW, Tatam RP (2007) Surface strain measurement using multi-component shearography with coherent fibre-optic imaging bundles. Meas Sci Technol 18:3583–359110.1088/0957-0233/18/11/043 ↗
26. Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20(062001):1–17
27. Hosford WF, Caddell RM (2007) Metal forming: mechanics and metallurgy, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Section 15.410.1017/CBO9780511811111 ↗
28. Ghosh AK, Hecker SS (1974) Stretching limits in sheet metals: in-plane versus out-of-plane deformation. Metall Trans 5:2161–216410.1007/BF02643929 ↗
29. Kitting D, Ofenheimer A, Pauli H, Till ET (2010) A phenomenological concept to predict formability in stretch-bending forming operations. Int J Mater Form 3(Supplement 1):1163–116610.1007/s12289-010-0979-6 ↗