Interfacial behaviors of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymers manufactured by fused filament fabrication: A review and prospect
Source abstract
Abstract
Continuous fiber reinforced polymers composites have significant potential due to their high specific strength and high specific modulus. But there are some limitations on manufacturing and maintenance for the composites using existing manufacturing technologies. Meanwhile, the increasingly advanced 3D printing technology, with advantages on complex components building, no need for assembling operations and precise entity replication, has brought new hope for the manufacture and application of continuous fiber reinforced composites. However, compared to traditionally manufactured composites, poor interfacial adhesion is the main weakness of 3D printed composites. In the present work, a comprehensive review study on the identification, categories, characterization and measuring methods for interfaces in 3D printed composites is presented. Particularly, the effects of materials, processing and design parameters on the interfacial properties and mechanical behaviors of 3D printed composites are systematically discussed. Based on these investigation and discussion, compilation of effective methods and technologies is presented to improve the interfacial adhesion and reduce the generation of voids. Also, modeling and simulation approaches are also presented for the special case of 3D printed composites. This work therefore intends to provide a reference source regarding interfacial properties, processing control, processing scalability and product performance of 3D printed composites, that could help researchers proceed and make contributions to this research field.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Prashanth S, Subbaya KM, Nithin K, Sachhidananda S (2017) Fiber Reinforced Composites - A Review. J Mater Sci Eng 6(3):1000341
2. Chen Q, Boisse P, Park C, Saouab A, Bréard J (2011) Intra/inter-ply shear behaviors of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites in thermoforming processes. Compos Struct 93:1692–170310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.01.002 ↗
3. Park KY, Choi JH, Lee DG (1995) Delamination-free and high-efficiency drilling of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics. J Compos Mater 29(15):1988–200210.1177/002199839502901503 ↗
4. Swolf Y, Pinhob ST (2019) 3D printed continuous fibre-reinforced composites: Bio-inspired microstructures for improving the translaminar fracture toughness. Compos Sci Technol 182:10773110.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107731 ↗
5. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou ZW, Gou JH, Hui D (2016) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos B Eng 110:442–45810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
6. Economidou SN, Lamprou DA, Douroumis D (2018) 3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm 544:415–42410.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.01.031 ↗
7. Tilford T, Stoyanov S, Braun J, Janhsen JC, Burgard M, Birch R (2018) Design, manufacture and test for reliable 3D printed electronics packaging. Microelectron Reliab 85:109–11710.1016/j.microrel.2018.04.008 ↗
8. Chua CK, Leong KF (2017) 3D printing and additive manufacturing: principles and applications, 5th edn. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore10.1142/10200 ↗
9. Koch C, Hulle LV, Rudolph N (2017) Investigation of mechanical anisotropy of the fused filament fabrication process via customized tool path generation. Addit Manuf 16:138–145
10. Blok LG, Longana ML, Yu H, Woods BKS (2018) An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Addit Manuf 22:176–186
11. Kelly J, Mohammadi M (2018) Uniaxial tensile behavior of sheet molded composite car hoods with different fibre contents under quasi-static strain rates. Mech Res Commun 87:42–5210.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.12.007 ↗
12. Casavola C, Cazzato A, Moramarco V, Pappalettere C (2016) Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory. Mater Des 90:453–45810.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009 ↗
13. Chacon JM, Caminero MA, García-Plaza E, Núnez PJ (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–15710.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
14. Ning F, Cong W, Qiu J, Wei J, Wang S (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos B Eng 80:369–37810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
15. Justo J, Távara L, García-Guzmán L, París F (2018) Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct 185:537–54810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052 ↗
16. Chohan JS, Singh R, Boparai KS, Penna R, Fraternali F (2017) Dimensional accuracy analysis of coupled fused deposition modeling and vapour smoothing operations for biomedical applications. Compos B Eng 117:138–14910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.045 ↗
17. Adumitroaie A, Antonov F, Khaziev A, Azarov A, Golubev M, Vasiliev VV (2019) Novel Continuous Fiber Bi-Matrix Composite 3D Printing Technology. Mater 12:301110.3390/ma12183011 ↗
18. Wickramasinghe S, Do T, Tran P (2020) FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments. Polymers 12(7):152910.3390/polym12071529 ↗
19. Hao W, Liu Y, Zhou H, Chen H, Fang D (2018) Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites. PolymTest 65:29–34
20. Ming Y, Zhang S, Han W, Wang B, Duan Y, Xiao H (2020) Investigation on process parameters of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced thermosetting epoxy composites. Addit Manuf 33:101184
21. Hu Q, Duan Y, Zhang H, Liu D, Yan B, Peng F (2018) Manufacturing and 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber prepreg filament. J Mater Sci 53(3):1887–189810.1007/s10853-017-1624-2 ↗
22. Ming Y, Duan Y, Wang B, Xiao H, Zhang X (2019) A novel route to fabricate high-performance 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced thermosetting polymer composites. Mater 12(9):136910.3390/ma12091369 ↗
23. Tian X, Liu T, Yang C, Wang Q, Li D (2016) Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 88:198–20510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
24. Hou Z, Tian X, Zhang J, Li D (2018) 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced composite corrugated structure. Compos Struct 184:1005–101010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.080 ↗
25. Luo M, Tian X, Shang J, Zhu W, Li D, Qin Y (2019) Impregnation and interlayer bonding behaviours of 3D-printed continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 121:130–13810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.020 ↗
26. Li N, Li Y, Liu S (2016) Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing. J Mater Process Technol 238:218–22510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.07.025 ↗
27. Tian X, Liu T, Wang Q, Dilmurat A, Li D, Ziegmann G (2017) Recycling and remanufacturing of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. J Clean Prod 142:1609–161810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
28. Luo M, Tian X, Shang J, Yun J, Zhu W, Li D, Qin Y (2020) Bi-scale interfacial bond behaviors of CCF/PEEK composites by plasma-laser cooperatively assisted 3D printing process. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 131:10581210.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105812 ↗
29. Yu T, Zhang Z, Song S, Bai Y, Wu D (2019) Tensile and flexural behaviors of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct 225:11114710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111147 ↗
30. Camineroa MA, Chacónb JM, García-Morenoa I, Reverteb JM (2018) Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Polym Test 68:415–42310.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038 ↗
31. Van der Klift F, Koga Y, Todoroki A, Ueda M, Hirano Y, Matsuzaki R (2016) 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermo-plastic (CFRTP) tensile test specimens Open. J Compos Mater 6(1):18–27
32. Peng Y, Wu Y, Wang K, Gao G, Ahzi S (2019) Synergistic reinforcement of polyamide-based composites by combination of short and continuous carbon fibers via fused filament fabrication. Compos Struct 201:232–23910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.014 ↗
33. Dickson AN, Barry JN, McDonnell KA, Dowling DP (2018) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 16:146–152
34. Peng Y, Wu Y, Li S, Wang K, Yao S, Liu Z, Garmestani H (2020) Tailorable rigidity and energy-absorption capability of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced polyamide composites. Compos Sci Technol 199:10833710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108337 ↗
35. Kishore V, Ajinjeru C, Nycz A, Post B, Lindahl J, Kunc V, Duty C (2017) Infrared preheating to improve interlayer strength of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) components. Addit Manuf 14:7–12
36. Van de Werken N, Hurley J, Khanbolouki P, Sarvestani AN, Tamijani AY, Tehrani M (2019) Design considerations and modeling of fiber reinforced 3D printed parts. Compos B Eng 160:684–69210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.094 ↗
37. Sarvestani AN, Van de Werken N, Khanbolouki P, Tehrani M (2017) 3D printed composites with continuous carbon fiber reinforcements. Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. November 3-9, Tampa, Florida, USA
38. Van de Werken N, Tekinalp H, Khanbolouki P, Ozcan S, Williams A, Tehrani M (2020) Additively manufactured carbon fber-reinforced composites: State of the art and perspective. Addit Manuf 31:100962
39. Turner NB, Strong R, Gold SA (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 20:192–20410.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 ↗
40. Ahn D, Kweon J-H, Kwon S, Song J, Lee S (2009) Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. J Mater Process Technol 209:5593–560010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.016 ↗
41. Sun Q, Rizvi GM, Bellehumeur CT, Gu P (2008) Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp J 14:72–8010.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
42. Zhang W, Wu AS, Sun J, Quan Z, Gu B, Sun B (2017) Characterization of residual stress and deformation in additively manufactured ABS polymer and composite specimens. Compos Sci Technol 150:102–11010.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.017 ↗
43. Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M, Jeong TK, Asahara H, Horiguchi K, Nakamura T, Todoroki A, Hirano T (2016) Three-dimensional printing of continuous fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 6:2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
44. Namiki M, Ueda M, Todoroki A, Hirano Y, Matsuzaki R (2014) 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced plastic. Proceedings of the Society of the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering (45):187-196
45. ATSM D2344/D2344M:2000 Standard Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates
46. ISO 11339:2005 Adhesives —T-peel test for flexible-to-flexible bonded assemblies
47. Teixeira de Freitas S, Sinke J (2015) Test method to assess interface adhesion in composite bonding. Appl Adhes Sci 3:910.1186/s40563-015-0033-5 ↗
48. Teixeira de Freitas S, Sinke J (2014) Adhesion Properties of Bonded Composite-to-Aluminium Joints Using Peel Tests. J Adhes 90(5–6):511–52510.1080/00218464.2013.850424 ↗
49. ASTM D3167-10:2010 Standard Test Method for Floating Roller Peel Resistance of Adhesives
50. Mei H, Ali Z, Ali I, Cheng L (2019) Tailoring strength and modulus by 3D printing different continuous fibers and filled structures into composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2:312–31910.1007/s42114-019-00087-7 ↗
51. Bulut M, Erkliğ A, Yeter E (2016) Hybridization effects on quasi-static penetration resistance in fiber reinforced hybrid composite laminates. Compos B Eng 98:9–2210.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.025 ↗
52. Wang K, Li S, Rao Y, Wu Y, Peng Y, Yao S (2019) Flexure Behaviors of ABS-Based Composites Containing Carbon and Kevlar Fibers by Material Extrusion 3D Printing. Polymers 11:187810.3390/polym11111878 ↗
53. Wang K, Li S, Wu Y, Rao Y, Peng P (2021) Simultaneous reinforcement of both rigidity and energy absorption of polyamide-based composites with hybrid continuous fibers by 3D printing. Compos Struct 267:11385410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113854 ↗
54. Ming Y, Xin Z, Zhang J, Duan Y, Wang B (2020) Fabrication of continuous glass fiber-reinforced dual-cure epoxy composites via UV-assisted fused deposition modeling. Compos Commun 21:10040110.1016/j.coco.2020.100401 ↗
55. Chiang C, Koenig JL (1980) Chemical reactions occurring at the interface of epoxy matrix and amino silane coupling agents in fiber-reinforced composites. Polym Compos 1(2):88–9210.1002/pc.750010207 ↗
56. Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3D-Printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26(34):5930–593510.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
57. Caminero MA, Rodríguez GP, Muñoz V (2016) Effect of stacking sequence on Charpy impact and flexural damage behaviour of composite laminates. Compos Struct 136:345–35710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.019 ↗
58. Hou Z, Tian X, Zheng Z, Zhang J, Zhe L, Li D, Malakhov AV, Polilov AN (2020) A constitutive model for 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite structures with variable fiber content. Compos B Eng 189(15):10789310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107893 ↗
59. Sugiyam K, Matsuzaki R, Malakhov AV, Polilov AN, Ueda M, Todoroki A, Hirano Y (2020) 3D printing of optimized composites with variable fiber volume fraction and stiffness using continuous fiber. Compos Sci Technol 186:10790510.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107905 ↗
60. Josepha K, Varghese S, Kalaprasad G, Thomas S, PrasannkumariL KP, Pavithran C (1996) Influence of interfacial adhesion on the mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of short sisal fibre reinforced polymer composites. Eur Polym J 32:1243–125010.1016/S0014-3057(96)00051-1 ↗
61. Rankouhi B, Javadpour S, Delfanian F, Letcher T (2016) Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prev 16(3):467–48110.1007/s11668-016-0113-2 ↗
62. Sood AK, Ohdar R, Mahapatra S (2010) Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des 31:287–29510.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
63. Dinwiddie RB, Kunc V, Lindal JM, Post B, Smith RJ, Love L (2014) Infrared imaging of the polymer 3D-printing process. Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XXXVI 9105:91050210.1117/12.2053425 ↗
64. Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright PK (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8:248–25710.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
65. Liu Y, Zhang X, Song C, Zhang Y, Fang Y, Yang B, Wang X (2015) An effective surface modification of carbon fiber for improving the interfacial adhesion of polypropylene composites. Mater Des 88:810–81910.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.100 ↗
66. Yu T, Ren J, Li S, Yuan H, Li Y (2010) Effect of fiber surface-treatments on the properties of poly(lactic acid)/ramie composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:499–50510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.006 ↗
67. Dong J, Jia C, Wang M, Fang X, Wei H (2017) Improved mechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites by growing carbon black on carbon fiber surface. Compos Sci Technol 149:75–8010.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.002 ↗
68. Pathak AK, Borah M, Ashish Gupta T, Yokozeki SR, Dhakate, (2016) Improved mechanical properties of carbon fiber/graphene oxideepoxy hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 135:28–3810.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.007 ↗
69. Yang SS, Nasr N, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2017) Designing automotive products for remanufacturing from material selection perspective. J Clean Prod 153:570–57910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.121 ↗
70. Akadiri PO, Olomolaiye PO, Chinyio EA (2013) Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Autom Constr 30:113–12510.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.004 ↗
71. Mousavi-Nasab SH, Sotoudeh-Anvari A (2018) A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: a critical study on rank reversal problem. J Clean Prod 182:466–48410.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.062 ↗
72. Zhang H, Wu Y, Wang K, Peng Y, Wang D, Yao S, Wang J (2020) Materials selection of 3D-printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites considering multiple criteria. Mater Des 196:10914010.1016/j.matdes.2020.109140 ↗
73. Wang J, Xie H, Weng Z, Senthil T, Wu L (2016) A novel approach to improve mechanical properties of parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 105:152–15910.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.078 ↗
74. Mori K-I, Maeno T, Nakagawa Y (2014) Dieless forming of carbon fibre reinforced plastic parts using 3D printer. Procedia Eng 81:1595–160010.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.196 ↗
75. Wang K, Long H, Chen Y, Baniassadi M, Rao Y, Peng Y (2021) Heat-treatment effects on dimensional stability and mechanical properties of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 147:10646010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106460 ↗
76. Bhandari S, Lopez-Anido RA, Gardner DJ (2019) Enhancing the interlayer tensile strength of 3D printed short carbon fiber reinforced PETG and PLA composites via annealing. Addit Manuf 30:100922
77. Ming Y, Xin Z, Zhang J, Duan Y, Wang B (2020) Fabrication of continuous glass fiber reinforced dual-cure epoxy composites via UV-assisted fused deposition modeling. Compos Commun 21:10040110.1016/j.coco.2020.100401 ↗
78. Azarov A, Antonov F, Vasil’ev V, Golubev M, Krasovskii D, Razin A, Salov V, Stupnikov VV, Khaziev A (2017) Development of a two-matrix composite material fabricated by 3D printing. Polym Sci Ser D 10(1):87–9010.1134/S1995421217010026 ↗
79. AzarovAV AFK, Golubev MV, Khaziev AR, Ushanov SA (2019) Composite 3D printing for the small size unmanned aerial vehicle structure. Compos B Eng 169:157–16310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.03.073 ↗
80. Melenka GW, Cheung BKO, Schofield JS, Dawson MR, Carey JP (2016) Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures. Compos Struct 153:866–87510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018 ↗
81. Kregers A, Melbardis YG (1978) Determination of the deformability of three dimensionally reinforced composites by the stiffness averaging method. Mech Compos Mater 14:1–5
82. Kreger A, Teters G (1980) Use of averaging methods to determine the viscoelastic properties of spatially reinforced composites. Mech Compos Mater 15:377–38310.1007/BF00605861 ↗
83. Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) The Halpin-Tsai equations: a review. Polym Eng Sci 16:5
84. Scida D, Aboura Z, Benzeggagha M, Bocherens E (1999) A micromechanics model for 3D elasticity and failure of woven-fibre composite materials. Compos Sci Technol 59:505–51710.1016/S0266-3538(98)00096-7 ↗
85. Moumen AE, Tarfaoui M, Lafdi K (2019) Additive manufacturing of polymer composites: Processing and modeling approaches. Compos B Eng 171:166–18210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.04.029 ↗
86. Ashouri Vajari D, González C, Llorca J, Legarth BN (2014) A numerical study of the influence of microvoids in the transverse mechanical response of unidirectional composites. Compos Sci Technol 97:46–5410.1016/j.compscitech.2014.04.004 ↗
87. Rao N, Wei N, Yao S, Wang K, Peng Y (2021) A process-structure-performance modeling for thermoplastic polymers via material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 39:101857
88. Wang K, Lu Y, Rao Y, Wei N, Ban J, Peng Y (2021) New insights into the synergistic influence of voids and interphase characteristics on effective properties of unidirectional composites. Compos Struct 255:11286210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112862 ↗
89. Domingo-Espin M, Puigoriol-Forcada JM, Garcia-Granada AA, Lluma J, Borros S, Reyes G (2015) Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling Polycarbonate parts. Mater Des 83:670–67710.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.074 ↗
90. Malakhov AV, Polilov AN (2016) Design of composite structures reinforced curvilinear fibres using FEM. Compos Appl Sci Manuf 87:23–2810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.005 ↗
91. Passos AG, Luersen MA, Steeves CA (2016) Optimal curved fibre orientations of a composite panel with cutout for improved buckling load using the Efficient Global Optimization algorithm. Eng Optim 49(8):1354–137210.1080/0305215X.2016.1256052 ↗
92. Zhang H, Yang D, Sheng Y (2018) Performance-driven 3D printing of continuous curved carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites: A preliminary numerical study. Compos B Eng 151:256–26410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.017 ↗
93. Sága M, Majko J, Handrik M, Vaško M, Sapietová A (2020) Proposal of Physical Model for Damage Simulation of Composite Structures Produced by 3D Printing. Acta Phys Pol A 138(2):245–24810.12693/APhysPolA.138.245 ↗
94. El Moumen A, Tarfaoui M, Lafdi K (2018) Computational homogenization of mechanical properties for laminate composites reinforced with thin flm made of carbon nanotubes. Appl Compos Mater 25:569–58810.1007/s10443-017-9636-2 ↗
95. Dong C (2016) Effects of process-induced voids on the properties of fibre reinforced composites. J Mater Sci Technol 32(7):597–60410.1016/j.jmst.2016.04.011 ↗
96. Somireddy M, Czekanski A (2021) Computational modeling of constitutive behaviour of 3D printed composite structures. J Mater Res Technol 11:1710–171810.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.030 ↗
97. Drach B, Tsukrov I, Gross T, Dietrich S, Weidenmann K, Piat R (2011) Numerical modeling of carbon/carbon composites with nanotextured matrix and 3D pores of irregular shapes. Int J Solids Struct 48(18):2447–245710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.04.021 ↗
98. Hyde A, He J, Cui X, Lua J, Liu L (2020) Effects of microvoids on strength of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite materials. Compos B Eng 187:1359–136810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107844 ↗
99. Kwon YW, Allen DH, Talreja R (2008) Multiscale Modelling and Simulation of Composite Materials and Structures. Springer, US, pp 317–35710.1007/978-0-387-68556-4 ↗
100. Seman SAHA, Ahmad R, Aki HM (2019) Meso-scale modelling and failure analysis of kenaf fiber reinforced composites under high strain rate compression loading. Compos B Eng 163:403–41210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.037 ↗