An enhanced Lemaitre model formulation for materials processing damage computation
Source abstract
Abstract
The Lemaitre damage model is now widely used to deal with coupled damage analyses for various mechanical applications. In this article, different extensions of the model are presented and discussed to deal with complex multiaxial configurations—such as multi-stages bulk forming processes. A specific treatment is done to account for compressive damage growth, and a stress triaxiality cut-off value is considered to avoid any damage evolution below a critical negative triaxiality. The damage potential is also modified to deal with highly ductile materials, and the plastic strain is split into a negative part and a positive part to differentiate damage growth for compressive states of stress and for tensile states of stress. Finally, an anisotropic damage approach based on the comparison between grain flow orientation and principal loading directions is defined. A combination of these extensions is achieved within a single Lemaitre formulation. Application on different examples show the robustness and accuracy of the model defined in this paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrade Pires FM, César de Sa JMA, Costa Sousa L, Natal Jorge RM (2003) Numerical Modelling of ductile plastic damage in bulk metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 45:273–29410.1016/S0020-7403(03)00051-1 ↗
2. César de Sa JMA, Areias PMA, Zheng C (2006) Damage modelling in metal forming problems using an implicit non-local gradient model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(48–49):6646–666010.1016/j.cma.2005.02.037 ↗
3. Brunet M, Morestin F, Walter H (2004) Damage identification for anisotropic sheet-metals using a non-local damage model. Int J Damage Mech 13:35–5710.1177/1056789504039259 ↗
4. Claire D, Hild F, Roux S (2007) Identification of a damage law by using full-field displacement measurements. Int J Damage Mech 16:179–19710.1177/1056789506064940 ↗
5. Jirasek M (1998) Nonlocal models for damage and fracture: comparison of approaches. Int J Solids Struct 35(31–32):4133–414510.1016/S0020-7683(97)00306-5 ↗
6. Steinmann P (1999) Formulation and computation of geometrically non-linear gradient damage. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:757–77910.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19991020)46:5<757::AID-NME731>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
7. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, de Vree JHP (1999) Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:3391–340310.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
8. Peerlings RHJ, Geers MGD, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM (2001) A critical comparison of nonlocal and gradient enhanced softening continua. Int J Solids Struct 38:7723–774610.1016/S0020-7683(01)00087-7 ↗
9. Cockcroft MG, Latham DJ (1968) Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Met 96:33–39
10. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
11. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–21710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
12. Oyane M, Sato T, Okimoto K, Shima S (1980) Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Work Technol 4:65–8110.1016/0378-3804(80)90006-6 ↗
13. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. Int J Plast 24:1071–109610.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
14. Lemaitre JA (1996) A course on damage mechanics. Springer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
15. Chaboche JL (1981) Continuous damage mechanics—a tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation. Nucl Eng Des 64:233–24710.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-8 ↗
16. Simo JC, Ju JW (1987) Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—I. Formulation. Int J Solids Struct 23(7):821–84010.1016/0020-7683(87)90083-7 ↗
17. Simo JC, Ju JW (1987) Strain- and stress-based continuum damage models—II. Computational aspects. Int J Solids Struct 23(7):841–86910.1016/0020-7683(87)90084-9 ↗
18. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall Mater 32:157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
19. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I—Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
20. Xue L (2007) Damage accumulation and fracture initiation in uncracked ductile solids subject to triaxial loading. Int J Solids Struct 44:5163–518110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.026 ↗
21. Mocellin K, Fourment L, Coupez T, Chenot JL (2001) Toward large scale F.E. computation of hot forging process using iterative solvers, parallel computation and multigrid algorithms. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52:473–48810.1002/nme.304 ↗
22. Chenot JL, Fourment L, Mocellin K (2002) Numerical treatment of contact and friction in FE simulation of forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 125–126(9):45–5210.1016/S0924-0136(02)00416-8 ↗
23. Chenot JL, Massoni E (2006) Finite element modelling and control of new metal forming processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(11):1194–120010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.031 ↗
24. Chastel Y, Diop A, Fanini S, Bouchard PO, Mocellin K (2008) Finite element modeling of tube piercing and creation of a crack. Int J Mater Form 1:355–35810.1007/s12289-008-0068-2 ↗
25. Sornin D, Fayolle S, Bouchard PO, Massoni E (2009) Plastic instabilities analysis during T-shaped tubes hydro-forming process. Int J Mater Form 2:131–14410.1007/s12289-009-0399-7 ↗
26. Saanouni K (2008) On the numerical prediction of the ductile fracture in metal forming. Eng Fract Mech 75(11):3545–355910.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.023 ↗
27. Lemaitre J, Desmorat R (2005) Engineering damage mechanics. Springer-Verlag
28. Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2005) On the cut-off value of negative triaxiality for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 72:1049–106910.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011 ↗
29. Bouchard PO, Bourgeon L, Lachapele H, Maire E, Verdu C, Forestier R, Logé R (2008) On the influence of particles distribution and reverse loading on damage mechanisms of ductile steel alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 496:223–23310.1016/j.msea.2008.05.033 ↗
30. Pichelin E, Coupez T (1998) Finite element solution of the 3D mold filling problem for viscous incompressible fluid. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 163(1–4):359–37110.1016/S0045-7825(98)00024-3 ↗
31. Coupez T, Digonnet H, Ducloux R (2000) Parallel meshing and remeshing. Appl Math Model 25(2):153–17510.1016/S0307-904X(00)00045-7 ↗
32. Besson J (2004) Local approach to fracture. Les Presses Ecole des Mines de Paris
33. Ladevèze P (1983) On a anisotropic damage theory. Proceedings of CNRS International Colloquium 351- Failure criteria of structured media, Vilars-de-Lans, France, Boehler J. P editor. 355–363
34. Vaz Jr M, de Santi Jr MN, Verrana GO, de Souza Neto EA (2005) Further studies on assessing ductile fracture using continuous damage coupled to an elasto-plastic material model. COMPLAS 2005
35. Bridgman PW (1964) Studies in large plastic flow and fracture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge10.4159/harvard.9780674731349 ↗
36. Liu DS, Lewandowski JJ (1993) The effects of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on deformation and fracture: part I. Monolithic 6061 aluminium. Metall Mater Trans 24A:601–608
37. Margevicius RW, Lewandowski JJ (1994) The influence of hydrostatic pressure on fracture of single-crystal and polycrystalline NiAl. Metall Mater Trans 25A:1457–147010.1007/BF02665478 ↗
38. Tai WH, Yang BX (1986) A new microvoid-damage model for ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 48:151–166
39. Chandrakanth S, Pandey PC (1995) An isotropic damage model for ductile material. Eng Fract Mech 50:457–46510.1016/0013-7944(94)00214-3 ↗
40. Bonora N (1997) A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure. Eng Fract Mech 58:11–2810.1016/S0013-7944(97)00074-X ↗
41. Pirondi A, Bonora N (2003) Modeling ductile damage under fully reversed cycling. Comput Mater Sci 26:129–14110.1016/S0927-0256(02)00411-1 ↗
42. Voyadjis GZ, Kattan PI (2005) Damage mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Ratton10.1201/9781420027839 ↗
43. Vaz M Jr, Owen DRJ (2001) Aspects of Ductile fracture and adaptive mesh refinement in damaged elasto-plastic materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:29–5410.1002/1097-0207(20010110)50:1<29::AID-NME18>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
44. Gouveia BPPA, Rodrigues JMC, Martins PAF (1996) Fracture predicting in bulk metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 38:361–37210.1016/0020-7403(95)00069-0 ↗
45. Bao Y, Treitler R (2004) Ductile crack formation on notched Al2024-T351 bars under compression–tension loading. Mater Sci Eng A 384(1–2):385–39410.1016/S0921-5093(04)00883-4 ↗
46. Peyrot I, Bouchard PO, Ghisleni R, Michler J (2009) Determination of plastic properties of metals by instrumented indentation using a stochastic optimization. J Mater Res 24(3):936–94710.1557/jmr.2009.0118 ↗