Optimization and inverse analysis in metal forming: scientific state-of-the-art and recent trends
Source abstract
Abstract
Nowadays, the accuracy and fast result-delivery of numerical simulations allow to perform not simply feasibility and validation tasks but to actually accomplish optimized process designs and solutions for the metal forming industry. This paper present a wide overview of the role of optimization and inverse analysis in the scientific and industrial community of metal forming, including the contribution of the ESAFORM association to this thematic, which is still growing after about three decades of intense research. The number of efficient and effective solutions comprising metal forming and optimization seems to increase year after year. Representative process optimization problems in sheet, bulk, and tube metal forming are presented through significant examples, and the treatment of uncertainty is also shown in stochastic approaches combined with optimization methods. Inverse problems in metal forming, which are solved with the aid of optimization methodologies, are also discussed particularly with emphasis on parameter identification problems and inverse material characterization in mechanical plasticity. The paper also identifies the most recent research trends and formulates some predictions for the future needs of industrial users. This paper shows not only that the relevance of the field of study is still increasing, but also that optimization and inverse analysis in metal forming is playing and will continue to play an important role in the digital transition of the metal forming industry, where simulation still represents the most advanced frontier.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Joun MS, Hwang SM (1993) Optimal process design in steady-state metal forming by finite element method—I. Theoretical considerations. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 33:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(93)90063-Z10.1016/0890-6955(93)90063-Z ↗
2. Fourment L, Chenot JL (1996) Optimal design for non-steady-state metal forming processes-1 shape optimization method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(19960115):33–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207. ::AID-NME844>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207 ↗
3. Chung JS, Hwang SM (1998) Application of a genetic algorithm to process optimal design in non-isothermal metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00209-X10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00209-X ↗
4. Park SH, Yoon JW, Yang DY, Kim YH (1999) Optimum blank design in sheet metal forming by the deformation path iteration method. Int J Mech Sci 41:1217–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(98)00084-810.1016/S0020-7403(98)00084-8 ↗
5. Takemasu T, Vazquez V, Painter B, Altan T (1996) Investigation of metal flow and preform optimization in flashless forging of a connecting rod. J Mater Process Technol 59:95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02290-x10.1016/0924-0136(96)02290-x ↗
6. Roy S, Ghosh S, Shivpuri R (1997) A new approach to optimal design of multi-stage metal forming processes with micro genetic algorithms. 37:29–4410.1016/0890-6955(95)00120-4 ↗
7. Kubli W, Reissner J (1995) autoform.pdf. J Mater Process Technol 50:292–30510.1016/0924-0136(94)01390-M ↗
8. Picart P, Ghouati O, Gelin JC (1998) Optimization of metal forming process parameters with damage minimization. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:597–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00167-810.1016/S0924-0136(98)00167-8 ↗
9. Gelin JC, Ghouati O (1995) The Inverse Approach for the Determination of Constitutive Equations in Metal Forming. Ann CIRP 44:189–19210.1016/S0007-8506(07)62304-X ↗
10. Chenot JL, Massoni E, Fourment L (1996) Inverse problems in finite element simulation of metal forming processes. Eng Comput (Swansea Wales) 13:190–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/0264440961011453010.1108/02644409610114530 ↗
11. Dang VT, Labergère C, Lafon P (2019) Adaptive metamodel-assisted shape optimization for springback in metal forming processes. Int J Mater Form 12:535–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1433-410.1007/s12289-018-1433-4 ↗
12. Nejadseyfi O, Geijselaers HJM, Atzema EH et al (2020) From specified product tolerance to acceptable material and process scatter: an inverse robust optimization approach. Int J Mater Form 13:467–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01554-z10.1007/s12289-020-01554-z ↗
13. Havinga J, Mandal PK, van den Boogaard T (2020) Exploiting data in smart factories: real-time state estimation and model improvement in metal forming mass production. Int J Mater Form 13:663–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01495-210.1007/s12289-019-01495-2 ↗
14. Ponthot J-P, Kleinermann J-P (2006) A cascade optimization methodology for automatic parameter identification and shape/process optimization in metal forming simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5472–5508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.01210.1016/j.cma.2005.11.012 ↗
15. Zhao G, Ma X, Zhao X, Grandhi RV (2004) Studies on optimization of metal forming processes using sensitivity analysis methods. J Mater Process Technol 147:217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.12.01810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.12.018 ↗
16. Azaouzi M, Naceur H, Delamézière A et al (2008) An Heuristic Optimization Algorithm for the blank shape design of high precision metallic parts obtained by a particular stamping process. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:842–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.06.00810.1016/j.finel.2008.06.008 ↗
17. Aydemir A, de Vree JHP, Brekelmans WAM et al (2005) An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes. J Mater Process Technol 159:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.01810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.05.018 ↗
18. Wang H, Chen L, Li E (2018) Time dependent sheet metal forming optimization by using Gaussian process assisted firefly algorithm. Int J Mater Form 11:279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1352-910.1007/s12289-017-1352-9 ↗
19. Mathew JJ, Sakhale CN, Shelare SD (2020) Latest Trends in Sheet Metal Components and Its Processes—A Literature Review. In: Sharma H., Govindan K., Poonia R., Kumar S. E-MW (ed) Advances in Computing and Intelligent Systems. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Singapore, pp 565–57410.1007/978-981-15-0222-4_54 ↗
20. Banabic D (2010) Sheet Metal Forming Processes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1 ↗
21. Starman B, Cafuta G, Mole N (2021) A Method for Simultaneous Optimization of Blank Shape and Forming Tool Geometry in Sheet Metal Forming Simulations. Met (Basel) 11:544. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1104054410.3390/met11040544 ↗
22. Tatipala S, Wall J, Johansson C, Larsson T (2020) A Hybrid Data-Based and Model-Based Approach to Process Monitoring and Control in Sheet Metal Forming. Processes 8:89. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr801008910.3390/pr8010089 ↗
23. Staud D, Merklein M (2008) Inverse Approach to the Forming Simulation of Tailored Heat Treated Blanks. Int J Mater Form 1:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0050-z10.1007/s12289-008-0050-z ↗
24. van den Boogaard AH, Carleer BD, Atzema EH, ter Wijlen EV (2008) Experimental validation of numerical sensitivities in a deep drawing simulation. Int J Mater Form 1:41–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0051-y10.1007/s12289-008-0051-y ↗
25. Maia A, Oliveira MC, Andrade-Campos A, Menezes LF (2015) Sensitivity Analysis for Numerical Sheet Metal Forming Processes. Key Eng Mater 651–653:1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.136910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1369 ↗
26. Di Lorenzo R, Ingarao G, Chinesta F (2009) A gradient-based decomposition approach to optimize pressure path and counterpunch action in Y-shaped tube hydroforming operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1813-x10.1007/s00170-008-1813-x ↗
27. Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R (2010) Design of Complex Sheet Metal Forming Processes: A New Computer Aided Progressive Approach. Int J Mater Form 3:21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0697-010.1007/s12289-010-0697-0 ↗
28. Marretta L, Di Lorenzo R (2011) A Comparative Analysis of Different Robust Design Approaches in Sheet Stamping Operations. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). pp 53–5810.1063/1.3589491 ↗
29. Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R, Micari F (2011) Moving Least Squares Innovative Strategies For Sheet Forming Design. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). pp 59–6410.1063/1.3589492 ↗
30. Germain S, Steinmann P (2012) Towards Inverse Form Finding Methods for a Deep Drawing Steel DC04. Key Eng Mater 504–506:619–624. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.61910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.619 ↗
31. Landkammer P, Steinmann P (2014) A Fast Approach to Shape Optimization Using the Inverse FEM. Key Eng Mater 611–612:1404–1410. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.140410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.1404 ↗
32. Landkammer P, Steinmann P (2015) Application of a Non-Invasive Form Finding Algorithm to the Ring Compression Test with Varying Friction Coefficients. Key Eng Mater 651–653:1381–1386. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.138110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1381 ↗
33. Caspari M, Landkammer P, Steinmann P (2018) Illustration of an improved non-invasive form finding algorithm. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). p 11000310.1063/1.5034960 ↗
34. Huhn S, Peeling D, Burkart M (2017) How Inverse Solver Technologies can Support Die Face Development and Process Planning in the Automotive Industry. In: Esaform, Dublin10.1063/1.5008120 ↗
35. Pilthammar J, Wall J, Sigvant M (2017) Framework for simulation-driven design of stamping dies considering elastic die and press deformations. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). p 10000610.1063/1.5008124 ↗
36. Wiebenga JH, Klaseboer G, van den Boogaard AH (2011) Robust optimization of metal forming processes using a metamodel-based strategy. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). pp 11–1610.1063/1.3589484 ↗
37. Havinga J, Klaseboer G, van den Boogaard AH (2013) Sequential Optimization of Strip Bending Process Using Multiquadric Radial Basis Function Surrogate Models. Key Eng Mater 554–557:911–918. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.91110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.911 ↗
38. Lafon P, Adragna P-A, Nguyen VD (2016) Multi-objective optimization under uncertainty for sheet metal forming. MATEC Web Conf 80:10004. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/2016801000410.1051/matecconf/20168010004 ↗
39. Dang VT, Lafon P, Labergere C (2017) Surrogate models for sheet metal stamping problem based on the combination of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Radial Basis Function. In: Esaform, Dublin10.1063/1.5008126 ↗
40. Prates PA, Marques AE, Oliveira MC, Fernandes JV (2019) Comparing metamodeling techniques for variability analysis in sheet metal forming processes. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. p 12000310.1063/1.5112658 ↗
41. Nejadseyfi O, Geijselaers HJM, van den Boogaard AH (2019) Tailoring material scatter for metal forming processes based on inverse robust optimization. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). p 12000510.1063/1.5112660 ↗
42. Pereira AFG, Ruivo MF, Oliveira MC et al (2021) Numerical study of the square cup stamping process: a stochastic analysis. ESAFORM 2021. https://doi.org/10.25518/esaform21.215810.25518/esaform21.2158 ↗
43. Strano M, Iorio L, Semeraro Q, Sofia R (2017) Fusion metamodeling of the bend deduction in air bending. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). Dublin, pp 7–1110.1063/1.5008121 ↗
44. Endelt B, Danckert J (2010) Iterative Learning and Feedback Control Applied on a Deep Drawing Process. Int J Mater Form 3:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0698-z10.1007/s12289-010-0698-z ↗
45. Havinga J, van den Boogaard AH (2015) Inverse Identification of Process Variations for Thin Steel Sheet Bending. Key Eng Mater 651–653:1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.136310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1363 ↗
46. Benoist V, Arnaud L, Baili M (2020) A new method of design for additive manufacturing including machining constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06059-210.1007/s00170-020-06059-2 ↗
47. Burkart M, Liewald M, Wied J et al (2020) Optimization of a Part Holder Design Considering Dynamic Loads during Return Stroke of Tool and Ram. Procedia Manuf 47:861–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.26910.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.269 ↗
48. Palani R, Wagoner RH, Narasimhan K (1994) Intelligent design environment: A knowledge based simulations approach for sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 45:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)90421-910.1016/0924-0136(94)90421-9 ↗
49. Wang H, Li G (2010) Sheet forming optimization based on least square support vector regression and intelligent sampling approach. Int J Mater Form 3:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0694-310.1007/s12289-010-0694-3 ↗
50. Li DY, Peng YH, Yin JL (2007) Optimization of metal-forming process via a hybrid intelligent optimization technique. Struct Multidiscip Optim 34:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0075-110.1007/s00158-006-0075-1 ↗
51. Merayo D, Rodríguez-Prieto A, Camacho AM (2021) Topological Optimization of Artificial Neural Networks to Estimate Mechanical Properties in Metal Forming Using Machine Learning. Met (Basel) 11:1289. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1108128910.3390/met11081289 ↗
52. Koch J, Völkl R, Engel U (2008) Effective Stochastic Simulation for the Optimization of Time, Costs and Quality in Cold Forging. Int J Mater Form 1:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0059-310.1007/s12289-008-0059-3 ↗
53. Shahriari D, Amiri A, Sadeghi MH, Cheraghzadeh M (2008) Optimal closed die finish forgings for nimonic80-A alloy using FEM method. Int J Mater Form 1:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0052-x10.1007/s12289-008-0052-x ↗
54. Ejday M, Fourment L (2010) Metamodel Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization of Non-steady Metal Forming Problems. Int J Mater Form 3:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0689-010.1007/s12289-010-0689-0 ↗
55. Meng F, Labergere C, Lafon P (2011) Initial billet and forging dies shape optimization: Application on an axisymetrical forging with a hammer. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Esaform). pp 77–8210.1063/1.3589495 ↗
56. Halouani A, Li YM, Abbès B et al (2012) Optimization of Forging Preforms by Using Pseudo Inverse Approach. Key Eng Mater 504–506:613–618. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.61310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.504-506.613 ↗
57. Imaninejad M, Subhash G, Loukus A (2005) Loading path optimization of tube hydroforming process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1504–151410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.01.029 ↗
58. Mohammadi F, Kashanizade H, Mashadi MM (2007) Optimization using finite element analysis, neural network, and experiment in tube hydroforming of aluminium T joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 221:1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM74110.1243/09544054JEM741 ↗
59. Loukus AR, Subhash G, Imaninejad M (2006) Optimization of Material Properties and Process Parameters for Tube Hydroforming of Aluminum Extrusions. J Eng Mater Technol 129:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.240025910.1115/1.2400259 ↗
60. Abedrabbo N, Worswick M, Mayer R, van Riemsdijk I (2009) Optimization methods for the tube hydroforming process applied to advanced high-strength steels with experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol 209:110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.06010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.060 ↗
61. Chebbah MS, Naceur H, Hecini M (2010) Rapid coupling optimization method for a tube hydroforming process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 224:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM160710.1243/09544054JEM1607 ↗
62. Mirzaali M, Liaghat GH, Naeini HM et al (2011) Optimization of Tube Hydroforming Process Using Simulated Annealing Algorithm. Procedia Eng 10:3012–3019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.49910.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.499 ↗
63. Bucconi M, Strano M (2018) Metamodeling and optimization of the THF process with pulsating pressure. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. p 11000210.1063/1.5034959 ↗
64. Strano M, Jirathearanat S, Altan T (2001) Adaptive FEM Simulation for Tube Hydroforming: a Geometry-Based Approach for Wrinkle Detection. CIRP Ann 50:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62101-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)62101-5 ↗
65. Manabe K, Suetake M, Koyama H, Yang M (2006) Hydroforming process optimization of aluminum alloy tube using intelligent control technique. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1207–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.02810.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.028 ↗
66. Kirby D, Roy S, Kunju R (2005) Optimization Of Tube Hydroforming With Consideration Of Manufacturing Effects On Structural Performance. AIP Conf Proc 778:585–590. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.201128510.1063/1.2011285 ↗
67. Yoon JW, Chung K, Pourboghrat F, Barlat F (2006) Design optimization of extruded preform for hydroforming processes based on ideal forming design theory. Int J Mech Sci 48:1416–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.07.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.07.003 ↗
68. Zhang H, Liu Y, Liu C (2017) Multi-Objective Parameter Optimization for Cross-Sectional Deformation of Double-Ridged Rectangular Tube in Rotary Draw Bending by Using Response Surface Methodology and NSGA-II. Met (Basel) 7:206. https://doi.org/10.3390/met706020610.3390/met7060206 ↗
69. An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2010) Multi-objective optimization and sensitivity analysis of tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2505-x10.1007/s00170-009-2505-x ↗
70. Xu J, Yang H, Li H, Zhan M (2012) Significance-based optimization of processing parameters for thin-walled aluminum alloy tube NC bending with small bending radius. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China (English Ed 22:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61154-010.1016/S1003-6326(11)61154-0 ↗
71. Yang J-B, Jeon B-H, Oh S-I (2001) Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of the hydroforming process. J Mater Process Technol 113:666–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00670-710.1016/S0924-0136(01)00670-7 ↗
72. Fann K-JJ, Hsiao P-Y (2003) Optimization of loading conditions for tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 140:520–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00778-710.1016/S0924-0136(03)00778-7 ↗
73. Strano M (2006) A technique for FEM optimization under uncertainty of time-dependent process variables in sheet metal forming. In: 9th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Glasgow (UK), pp 31–34
74. Baghdasaryan L, Chen W, Buranathiti T, Cao J (2002) Model Validation Via Uncertainty Propagation Using Response Surface Models. In: Detc2002/dac-34140. pp 1–1210.1115/DETC2002/DAC-34140 ↗
75. Merten M, Liebold K, Haufe A (2021) Robustness analysis with LS-OPT® and LS-DYNA® for sheet metal forming simulations. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 1157:012088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1157/1/01208810.1088/1757-899X/1157/1/012088 ↗
76. Sahai A, Schramm U, Buranathiti T et al (2004) Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Metal Forming Processes. AIP Conf Proc 712:2009–2013. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.176682910.1063/1.1766829 ↗
77. Cao J, Buranathiti T, Xia ZC, Chen W (2005) Probabilistic Design in a Sheet Metal Stamping Process under Failure Analysis. In: Numisheet 2005. AIP Conference Proceedings, pp 867–87210.1063/1.2011331 ↗
78. Faes M, Van Doninck B, Imholz M, Moens D (2018) Product reliability optimization under plate sheet forming process variability. In: 8th International Workshop on Reliable Computing “Computing with Confidence.” Liverpool
79. Colosimo BM, Pagani L, Strano M (2015) Reduction of calibration effort in FEM-based optimization via numerical and experimental data fusion. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51:463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1149-010.1007/s00158-014-1149-0 ↗
80. Zhang W, Sheng ZQ, Shivpuri R (2005) Probabilistic Design of Aluminum Sheet Drawing for Reduced Risk of Wrinkling and Fracture. In: Numisheet 2005. AIP Conference Proceedings, pp 247–25210.1063/1.2011227 ↗
81. Strano M, Burdi A (2007) Classification of problems under uncertainty, in fem-based analysis and design of sheet metal forming operations. In: Key Engineering Materials. pp 817–82410.4028/0-87849-437-5.817 ↗
82. Strano M (2010) Reliability Based Economical Optimization of Sheet Metal Forming Processes. Int J Mater Form 3:41–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0702-710.1007/s12289-010-0702-7 ↗
83. Alifanov OM (1994) Inverse Heat Transfer Problems. Springer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-76436-3 ↗
84. Martins JMP, Andrade-Campos A, Thuillier S (2018) Comparison of inverse identification strategies for constitutive mechanical models using full-field measurements. Int J Mech Sci 145:330–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.01310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.013 ↗
85. Avril S, Bonnet M, Bretelle A-S et al (2008) Overview of Identification Methods of Mechanical Parameters Based on Full-field Measurements. Exp Mech 48:381–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-008-9148-y10.1007/s11340-008-9148-y ↗
86. M Grédiac FH (2012) Full-field measurements and identification in solid mechanics. John Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118578469 ↗
87. Pierron F, Grédiac M (2021) Towards Material Testing 2.0. A review of test design for identification of constitutive parameters from full-field measurements. Strain 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/str.1237010.1111/str.12370 ↗
88. Tarantola A (2005) Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics10.1137/1.9780898717921 ↗
89. Oliveira MG, Martins JMP, Coelho B et al (2021) On the optimisation efficiency for the inverse identification of constitutive model parameters. In: ESAFORM 202110.25518/esaform21.1486 ↗
90. de-Carvalho R, Valente RAF, Andrade-Campos A (2010) On the Objective Function Evaluation in Parameter Identification of Material Constitutive Models - Single-point or FE Analysis. Int J Mater Form 3:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0700-910.1007/s12289-010-0700-9 ↗
91. Kowalewski Ł, Gajewski M (2019) Assessment of Optimization Methods Used to Determine Plasticity Parameters Based on DIC and back Calculation Methods. Exp Tech 43:385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-018-00298-510.1007/s40799-018-00298-5 ↗
92. Sabat L, Kundu CK (2021) History of Finite Element Method: A Review. In: Recent Developments in Sustainable Infrastructure. pp 395–40410.1007/978-981-15-4577-1_32 ↗
93. Dixit US (2020) Modeling of metal forming: a review. Mechanics of Materials in Modern Manufacturing Methods and Processing Techniques. Elsevier, pp 1–3010.1016/B978-0-12-818232-1.00001-1 ↗
94. Cao J, Banu M (2020) Opportunities and Challenges in Metal Forming for Lightweighting: Review and Future Work. J Manuf Sci Eng 142. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404773210.1115/1.4047732 ↗
95. Gavrus A, Banu M, Ragneau E et al (2008) An inverse analysis approach of the Erichsen test starting from a finite element model. Int J Mater Form 1:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0058-410.1007/s12289-008-0058-4 ↗
96. Pottier T, Toussaint F, Vacher P (2008) An inverse method for material parameters determination of titanium samples under tensile loading. Int J Mater Form 1:21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0054-810.1007/s12289-008-0054-8 ↗
97. Van Hoof T, Lani F (2008) Micro-macro modeling of spheroidal cast iron: parameters identification by inverse analysis. Int J Mater Form 1:45–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-008-0048-610.1007/s12289-008-0048-6 ↗
98. Aydın M-S, Gerlach J, Kessler L (2010) Inverse Identification of Advanced Yield Criteria Using Cup Drawing and Rensile Tests. Int J Mater Form 3:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0699-y10.1007/s12289-010-0699-y ↗
99. Grilo TJ, Souto N, Valente RAF et al (2013) On the Development and Computational Implementation of Complex Constitutive Models and Parameters’ Identification Procedures. In: Key Engineering Materials. pp 936–94810.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.936 ↗
100. Szeliga D, Kuziak R, Pietrzyk M (2015) Identification Problem of Internal Variables Model of Material. In: Key Engineering Materials. pp 1339–134410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1339 ↗