Surface defect classification and detection on extruded aluminum profiles using convolutional neural networks
Source abstract
Abstract
For decades, aluminum extrusion has been successfully applied in the manufacturing of profiles for the applications ranging from locomotives to skyscrapers. In recent years however, increasing profile complexity and the need for rapid production have lead to greater challenges for manufactures seeking rapid and robust production procedures. As a consequence, the occurrence of defects in extruded profile surfaces continues to create difficulties often requiring disposal of entire components. Hence, quality inspection of the profiles must be performed prior to packing in order to identify and appropriately manage defect-containing extrusions. Up until now, quality control in extrusion factories is primarily performed by the human eye due to its high performance in discriminating defect varieties. But human performance is cost intensive and furthermore prone to failure, especially when applied in high-throughput environments. On that account this paper proposes an approach in surface defect classification and detection, whereby a simple camera records the extruded profiles during production and a neural network architecture distinguishes between immaculate surfaces and surfaces containing a variety of common defects (surface defect classification). Furthermore, a neural network is employed to point out the defects in the video frames (surface defect detection). In this work, we show that methods from artificial intelligence are highly compatible with industrial applications such as quality control even under common industry constraints such as very limited data set sizes for training a neural network. Data augmentation as well as transfer learning are the key ingredients for training networks that meet the high requirements of modern production facilities in detecting surface defects, particularly when access to training sets is limited. Accuracies of 0.98 in the classification and mean average precisions of 0.47 in the detection setting are achieved whilst training on a data set containing as little as 813 images. Real-time classification and detection codes are implemented, and the networks perform reliably despite changes in lighting conditions and camera orientation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Qamar SZ, Arif AFM, Sheikh AK (2004) Analysis of product defects in a typical aluminum extrusion facility. Mater Manuf Process 19(3):391–40510.1081/AMP-120038650 ↗
2. Chondronasios A, Popov I, Jordanov I (2016) Feature selection for surface defect classification of extruded aluminum profiles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):33–4110.1007/s00170-015-7514-3 ↗
3. Gonzalez-Adrados JR, Pereira H (1996) Classification of defects in cork planks using image analysis. Wood Sci Technol 30(3):207–21510.1007/BF00231634 ↗
4. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Information science and statistics. Springer
5. Lopes F, Pereira H, Natale FGB, De Tintrup F, Giusto DD, Vernazza G (1995) Cork pores and defects detection by morphological image analysis. Wood Science and Technology
6. Georgieva A, Jordanov I (2007) Image processing techniques for cork tiles classification. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on signal processing and communications, pp 576–57910.1109/ICSPC.2007.4728384 ↗
7. Di L, Liang L-Q, Zhang W-J (2014) Defect inspection and extraction of the mobile phone cover glass based on the principal component analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9–12):1605–1614
8. Shlens J (2005) A tutorial on principal component analysis. arXiv: 1404.1100
9. Engelhardt M, Behne D, Grittner N, Neumann A, Reimche W, Klose C (2015) Non-destructive testing of longitudinal and charge weld seams in extruded aluminum and magnesium profiles, vol 210.1016/j.matpr.2015.10.037 ↗
10. Garbacz P, Giesko T, Mazurkiewicz A (2015) Inspection method of aluminium extrusion process. Arch Civil Mech Eng 15(3):631–63810.1016/j.acme.2015.02.005 ↗
11. Zhang X-w, Ding Y-q, Lv Y-y, Shi A-y, Liang R-y (2011) A vision inspection system for the surface defects of strongly reflected metal based on multi-class svm. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5930–593910.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.030 ↗
12. Park J-K, Kwon B-K, Park J-H, Kang D-J (2016) Machine learning-based imaging system for surface defect inspection. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 3(3):303–31010.1007/s40684-016-0039-x ↗
13. Ciora RA, Simion CM (2014) Industrial applications of image processing. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis–Technical Series 64(1):17–2110.2478/aucts-2014-0004 ↗
14. Tzutalin (2015) Labelimg. https://github.com/tzutalin/labelImg . Git code
15. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv: 1409.1556
16. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 770–77810.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
17. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed SE, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 1–910.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
18. Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, Huang Z, Karpathy A, Khosla A, Bernstein M, Berg AC, Fei-Fei L (2015) (* = equal contribution). Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge IJCV. http://www.image-net.org/challenges/LSVRC/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
19. Demant C, Streicher-Abel B, Garnica C (2013) Industrial image processing: visual quality control in manufacturing, 2 edn. Springer10.1007/978-3-642-33905-9 ↗
20. Yao Y, Rosasco L, Caponnetto A (2007) On early stopping in gradient descent learning. Constr Approx 26(2):289–31510.1007/s00365-006-0663-2 ↗
21. Pan SJ, Yang Q (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(10):1345–135910.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
22. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Pereira F, Burges CJC, Bottou L, Weinberger KQ (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 25. Curran Associates, Inc., pp 1097–1105
23. Sermanet P, Eigen D, Zhang X, Mathieu M, Fergus R, Lecun Y (2014) Overfeat: integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks. In: International conference on learning representations (ICLR2014), CBLS
24. Zeiler MD, Fergus R (2014) Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: ECCV10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 ↗
25. Diederik PK, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv: 1412.6980
26. Ren S, He K, Girshick RB, Sun J (2015) Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39:1137–114910.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
27. Girshick RB, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J (2014) Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 580–58710.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
28. Girshick RB (2015) Fast R-CNN. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV), pp 1440–144810.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
29. Huang J, Rathod V, Sun C, Zhu M, Korattikara A, Fathi A, Fischer I, Wojna Z, Song Y, Guadarrama S, Murphy K (2016) Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors. arXiv: 1611.10012
30. Ruder S (2016) An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv: 1609.04747