Advances in anisotropy and formability
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents synthetically the most recent models for description of the anisotropic plastic behavior. The first section gives an overview of the classical models. Further, the discussion is focused on the anisotropic formulations developed on the basis of the theories of linear transformations and tensor representations, respectively. Those models are applied to different types of materials: body centered, faced centered and hexagonal-close packed metals. A brief review of the experimental methods used for characterizing and modeling the anisotropic plastic behavior of metallic sheets and tubes under biaxial loading is presented together with the models and methods developed for predicting and establishing the limit strains. The capabilities of some commercial programs specially designed for the computation of forming limit curves (FLC) are also analyzed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Abedrabbo N, Pourboghrat F, Carsley J (2006) Forming of aluminum alloys at elevated temperatures. Int J Plast 22:314–37310.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.005 ↗
2. Ahmadi S, Eivani AR, Akbarzadeh A (2009) An experimental and theoretical study on the prediction of Forming Limit Diagrams using new BBC yield criteria and M–K analysis. Comput Mater Sci 44:1272–128010.1016/j.commatsci.2008.08.013 ↗
3. Allwood JM, Shouler DR, Tekkaya AE (2007) The increased forming limits of incremental sheet forming processes. Key Eng Mat 344:621–62810.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.344.621 ↗
4. Allwood JM, Shouler DR (2008) Generalised forming limit diagrams showing increased forming limits with non-planar stress states. Int J Plast 25:1207–123010.1016/j.ijplas.2008.11.001 ↗
5. Aretz H (2004) Numerical restrictions of the modified maximum force criterion for prediction of forming limits in sheet metal forming. Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng 12:677–69210.1088/0965-0393/12/4/009 ↗
6. Aretz H (2006) Impact of the equibiaxial plastic strain ratio on the FLD prediction. In: Juster N, Rosochowski A (eds.), Proc. 9th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Glasgow, April 2006. AKAPIT, Krakow, 311–314
7. Arminjon M, Imbault D, Bacroix B, Raphanel JL (1994) 1994: A fourth-order plastic potential for anisotropic metals and its analytical calculation from the texture function. Acta Mech 107:33–5110.1007/BF01201818 ↗
8. Arrieux R, Bedrin C, Boivin M (1982) Determination of an intrinsec Forming Limit Stress Diagram for isotropic sheets. In: Proc. of the 12th IDDRG Congress. S-ta Margerita Ligure, 61–71
9. Arrieux R, Bedrin C, Boivin M (1985) Determination of the strain path influence of the forming limit diagrams, from the limit stress curve. Annals of the CIRP 34:205–20810.1016/S0007-8506(07)61757-0 ↗
10. Arrieux R (1987) Determination of the Forming Limit Stress Curve for Anisotropic Sheets. Annals of the CIRP 36:195–19810.1016/S0007-8506(07)62584-0 ↗
11. Asaro RJ, Needleman A (1985) Texture development and strain hardening in rate-dependent polycrystals. Acta Metall 33:923–95310.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-9 ↗
12. Banabic D (1999) Limit strains in the sheet metals by using the 1993 Hill's yield criterion. J Mater Process Tech 92-93:429–43210.1016/S0924-0136(99)00179-X ↗
13. Banabic D, Comsa DS, Balan T (2000) A new yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane–stress conditions. In: Banabic D (ed) Proc. of the 7th Conf. TPR2000. Cluj Napoca, 217–224
14. Banabic D (2000) Anisotropy of Sheet Metals. In: Banabic D (ed) Formability of metallic materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 119–17210.1007/978-3-662-04013-3_4 ↗
15. Banabic D (2000) Forming Limits of Sheet Metals. In: Banabic D (ed) Formability of metallic materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 173–21510.1007/978-3-662-04013-3_5 ↗
16. Banabic D (2000) Theoretical models of the FLD’s. In: Banabic D (ed) Formability of metallic materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 317–32710.1007/978-3-662-04013-3 ↗
17. Banabic D, Dannenmann E (2001) The influence of the yield locus shape on the limits strains. J Mater Process Tech 109:9–1210.1016/S0924-0136(00)00770-6 ↗
18. Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T, Comsa DS, Julean D (2003) Non-quadratic yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions. Int J Mech Sci 45:797–81110.1016/S0020-7403(03)00139-5 ↗
19. Banabic D et al (2004) FLD theoretical model using a new anisotropic yield criterion. J Mater Process Tech 157-158:23–2710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.015 ↗
20. Banabic D (2004) Anisotropy and formability of AA5182-0 aluminium alloy sheets. Annales of CIRP 53:219–22210.1016/S0007-8506(07)60683-0 ↗
21. Banabic D, et al. (2004) Prediction of FLC from two anisotropic constitutive models. In: Stören S (ed) Proc. 7th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Trondheim, 455–459
22. Banabic D, Aretz H, Comsa DS, Paraianu L (2005) An improved analytical description of orthotropy in metallic sheets. Int J Plast 21:493–51210.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.003 ↗
23. Banabic D, Aretz H, Paraianu L, Jurco P (2005) Application of various FLD modelling approaches. J Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng 13:759–76910.1088/0965-0393/13/5/009 ↗
24. Banabic D, Cazacu O, Paraianu L, Jurco P (2005) Recent developments in the formability of aluminum alloys. In: Smith LM, Pourboghrat F, Yoon J-W, StoughtonTB (eds) Proc. of the NUMISHEET 2005 Conference. AIP 466–47210.1063/1.2011264 ↗
25. Banabic D (2006) Numerical prediction of FLC using the M-K-Model combined with advanced material models. In: Hora P (ed) Numerical and experimental methods in prediction of forming limits in sheet forming and tube hydroforming processes. ETH Zürich, Zürich, pp 37–42
26. Banabic D, Vos M (2007) Increasing the robustness in the simulation of sheet metal forming processes using a new concept—Forming Limit Band. Annales of CIRP 56:249–25210.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.058 ↗
27. Banabic D, Barlat F, Cazacu O, Kuwabara T (2007) Anisotropy and formability. In: Chinesta F, Cueto E (eds) Advances in material forming-ESAFORM 10 years on. Springer, Heidelberg-Berlin, pp 143–17310.1007/978-2-287-72143-4_9 ↗
28. Banabic D, Soare S (2008) On the effect of the normal pressure upon the forming limit strains. In: Hora P (ed) Proc. of the NUMISHEET 2008 Conf., Interlaken, Switzerland, 199–204
29. Banabic D, Soare S (2009) Assessment of the modified maximum force criterion for aluminum metallic sheets. Key Eng Mat 410-411:511–52010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.410-411.511 ↗
30. Banabic D et al (2010) Sheet metal forming processes. Springer, Heidelberg10.1007/978-3-540-88113-1 ↗
31. Barata da Rocha A, Jalinier JM (1984) Plastic instability of sheet metals under simple and complex strain path. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn 24:133–140
32. Barata da Rocha A, Barlat F, Jalinier JM (1985) Prediction of the forming limit diagrams of anisotropic sheets in linear and non-linear loading. Mater Sci Eng 68:151–16410.1016/0025-5416(85)90404-5 ↗
33. Barlat F, Richmond O (1985) Prediction of tricomponent plane stress yield surfaces and associated flow and failure behavior of strongly textured FCC sheets. Mater Sci Eng 95:15–2910.1016/0025-5416(87)90494-0 ↗
34. Barlat F (1987) Crystallographic texture, anisotropic yield surfaces and forming limits of sheet metals. Mater Sci Eng 91:55–7210.1016/0025-5416(87)90283-7 ↗
35. Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic Behavior and Stretchability of Sheet Metals. Part I: yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 5:51–6610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
36. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7:693–71210.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
37. Barlat F, Chung K (1993) Anisotropic potentials for plastically deforming. Metals, Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 1:403–41610.1088/0965-0393/1/4/005 ↗
38. Barlat F, Becker RC, Hayashida Y, Maeda Y, Yanagawa M, Chung K, Brem JC, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S (1997) Yielding description of solution strengthened aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 13:185–40110.1016/S0749-6419(97)80005-8 ↗
39. Barlat F, Maeda Y, Chung K, Yanagawa M, Brem JC, Hayashida Y, Lege DJ, Matsui K, Murtha SJ, Hattori S, Becker RC, Makosey S (1997) Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets. J Mech Phys Solid 45:1727–176310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00034-3 ↗
40. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi S-H, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheet-Part I: Theory. Int J Plast 19:1297–131910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
41. Barlat F, Cazacu O, Zyczowski M, Banabic D, Yoon JW (2004) Yield surface plasticity and anisotropy. In: Raabe D, Roters F, Barlat F, Chen L-Q (eds) Continuum scale simulation of engineering materials–fundamentals—microstructures—process applications. WileyVCH Verlag, Manheim, pp 145–17710.1002/3527603786.ch6 ↗
42. Barlat F (2005) Constitutive modeling for metals. In: Banabic D (ed) Proc. 8th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Cluj-Napoca April 2005. The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 3–1010.1063/1.2011245 ↗
43. Barlat F, Chung K (2005) Anisotropic strain rate potential for aluminum alloy plasticity. In: Banabic D (ed) Proc. 8th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Cluj-Napoca April 2005. The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 415–418
44. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW, Karabin ME, Brem JC, Dick RE (2005) Linear transformation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:1009–103910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
45. Barlat F (2007) Constitutive modeling for metals. In: Banabic D (ed) Advanced methods in material forming. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 5–25
46. Barlat F, Yoon JW, Cazacu O (2007) On linear transformations of stress tensors for the description of plastic anisotropy. Int J Plast 23:876–89610.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.001 ↗
47. Bate P (1984) The prediction of limit strains in steel sheet using a discrete slip plasticity model. Int J Mech Sci 26:373–38410.1016/0020-7403(84)90064-X ↗
48. Bell JF (1984) The Experimental Foundations of Solid Mechanics. In: Truesdell C (ed) Mechanics of Solids, vol I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
49. Berstad T et al. (2004) FEM and a microstructure based work-hardening model used to calculate FLCs. In: Stören S (ed) Proc. 7th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Trondheim, 131-134
50. Boehler JP, Demmerle S, Koss S (1984) A new direct biaxial testing machine for anisotropic materials. Exp Mech 34:1–910.1007/BF02328435 ↗
51. Boger RK, Wagoner RH, Barlat F, Lee MG, Chung K (2005) Continuous, large strain, tension/compression testing of sheet material. Int J Plast 21:2319–234310.1016/j.ijplas.2004.12.002 ↗
52. Borsutzki M, Keßler L, Sonne H-M (2002) Kennzeichnung des Verfestigungsverhaltens von Werkstoffen mit der Biaxialprüfung. In: Werkstoffprüfung 2002, Proc. DVM-Conference, Bad Nauheim, 186 (in German)10.1002/9783527610310.ch23 ↗
53. Boudeau N, Gelin JC, Salhi S (1998) Computational prediction of the localized necking in sheet forming based on microstructural material aspects. Comput Mater Sci 11:45–6410.1016/S0927-0256(97)00153-5 ↗
54. Boudeau N, Gelin JC (2000) Necking in sheet metal forming. Influence of macroscopic and microscopic properties of materials. Int J Mech Sci 42:2209–223210.1016/S0020-7403(00)00003-5 ↗
55. Bragard A, Baret JC, Bonnarens H (1972) A simplified technique to determine the FLD at onset of necking. CRM 33:53–63
56. Bressan JD, Williams JA (1983) The use of a shear instability criterion to predict local necking in sheet metal deformation. Int J Mech Sci 25:155–16810.1016/0020-7403(83)90089-9 ↗
57. Bron F, Besson J (2003) A yield function for anisotropic materials. Application to aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 20:937–96310.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.001 ↗
58. Brunet M, Morestin F (2001) Experimental and analytical necking studies of anisotropic sheet metals. J Mater Process Tech 112:214–22610.1016/S0924-0136(01)00578-7 ↗
59. Brunet M, Morestin F, Walter H (2001) Damage modeling in sheet metals forming processes with experimental validations. In: Habraken AM (ed) Proc. 4th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Liege, 209–212
60. Brunet M, Morestin F, Walter H (2002) Anisotropic ductile fracture in sheet metal forming processes using damage theory. In: Pietrzyk M, Mitura Z, Kaczmat J (eds) Proc. 5th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Krakow, 135–138
61. Brunet M, Morestin F, Walter-Laberre H (2005) Failure analysis of anisotropic sheet metals using a non-local plastic damage model. J Mater Process Tech 170:457–47010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.046 ↗
62. Brunet M, Clerc P (2007) Two prediction methods for ductile sheet metal failure, In: Proc. 10th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Zaragoza, 297–30210.1063/1.2729528 ↗
63. Butuc C et al (2002) A more general model for FLD prediction. J Mater Process Tech 125-126:213–21810.1016/S0924-0136(02)00315-1 ↗
64. Butuc C, et al. (2002) Influence of constitutive equations and strain-path change on the forming limit diagram for 5182 Aluminum Alloy. In: Pietrzyk M, Mitura Z, Kaczmat J (eds) Proc. 5th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Krakow, 715–719
65. Butuc C, Gracio JJ, Barata da Rocha A (2003) A theoretical study on forming limit diagrams prediction. J Mater Process Tech 142:714–72410.1016/S0924-0136(03)00813-6 ↗
66. Butuc C, Gracio JJ, Barata da Rocha A (2005) Application of the YLD 96 yield criterion on describing the anisotropy and formability of the BCC materials. In: Banabic D (ed) Proc. 8th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Cluj-Napoca April 2005. The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 391–394
67. Butuc C et al (2006) An experimental and theoretical analysis on the application of stress-based forming limit criterion. Int J Mech Sci 48:414–42910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.11.007 ↗
68. Cao J et al (2000) Prediction of localized thinning in sheet metal using a general anisotropic yield criterion. Int J Plast 16:1105–112910.1016/S0749-6419(99)00091-1 ↗
69. Cao V, Lee W, Cheng HS, Seniw M, Wang H-P, Chung K (2009) Experimental and numerical investigation of combined isotropic-kinematic hardening behavior of sheet metals. Int J Plast 25:942–97210.1016/j.ijplas.2008.04.007 ↗
70. Carleer B, Sigvant M (2006) Process scatter with respect to material scatter. In: Liewald M (ed) New developments in sheet metal forming. Institute for Metal Forming Technology, University of Stuttgart, 225–239
71. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2001) Generalization of Drucker’s yield criterion to orthotropy. Math Mech Solid 6:613–63010.1177/108128650100600603 ↗
72. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2003) Application of representation theory to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminum alloys. Int J Eng Sci 41:1367–138510.1016/S0020-7225(03)00037-5 ↗
73. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2004) A criterion for description of anisotropy and yield differential effects in pressure-insensitive metals. Int J Plast 20:2027–204510.1016/j.ijplas.2003.11.021 ↗
74. Cazacu O, Plunkett B, Barlat F (2006) Orthotropic yield criterion for hexagonal close packed metals. Int J Plast 22:1171–119410.1016/j.ijplas.2005.06.001 ↗
75. Cazacu O, Barlat F (2008) Modeling plastic anisotropy and strength differential effects in metallic materials. In: Cazacu O (ed) Multiscale modeling of heterogeneous materials: from microstructure to macroscale properties. ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 71–9110.1002/9780470611364.ch5 ↗
76. Cazacu O, Ionescu IR, Yoon JW (2009) Orthotropic strain rate potential for description of anisotropy in tension and compression of metals. Int. J. Plast. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.005 ↗
77. Chan KC, Tong GQ (2003) Formability of high-strain-rate superplastic Al-4.4Cu-1.5Mg/21SiCW, composite under biaxial tension. Mater Sci Eng A340:49–5710.1016/S0921-5093(02)00154-5 ↗
78. Chow CL et al (1997) A unified damage approach for predicting FLDs. Trans ASME, J Eng Mater Tech 119:346–35310.1115/1.2812269 ↗
79. Chow CL, Yang XJ (2001) Prediction of the FLD on the basis of the damage criterion under non-proportional loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng 215C:405–414
80. Chow CL et al (2001) Prediction of FLD for AL6111-T4 under non-proportional loading. Int J Mech Sci 43:471–48610.1016/S0020-7403(99)00123-X ↗
81. Chung K, Yoon JW, Richmond O (2000) Ideal sheet forming with frictional constraints. Int J Plast 16:595–61010.1016/S0749-6419(99)00068-6 ↗
82. Comsa DS, Banabic D (2010) An improved version of the Modified Maximum Force Criterion (MMFC)
83. Dell H, Gese H, Oberhofer G (2008) Advanced yield loci and anisotropic hardening in the material model MF GENYLD + CRACHFEM. In: Hora P (ed) Proc. of the NUMISHEET 2008 Conf., Interlaken, Switzerland, 49–54
84. Demmerle S, Boehler JP (1983) Optimal design of biaxial tensile cruciform specimens. J Mech Phys Solid 41:143–18110.1016/0022-5096(93)90067-P ↗
85. d’Hayer R, Bragard A (1975) Determination of the limiting strains at the onset of necking. CRM 42:33–35
86. Drucker DC (1949) Relation of experiments to mathematical theories of plasticity. J Appl Mech 16:349–35710.1115/1.4010009 ↗
87. Dudzinski D, Molinari A (1988) Instability of visco-plastic deformation in biaxial loading. CR Acad Sci Paris 307:1315–1321
88. Eberle B, VolkW, Hora P (2008) Experimental FLC with a full 2D approach based on a time depending method. In: Hora P (ed) Proc. of the NUMISHEET 2008 Conf., Interlaken, Switzerland, 279–284
89. Evangelista SH et al (2002) Implementing a modified Marciniak-Kuczynki model using the FEM for the simulation of sheet metal deep drawing. J Mater Process Tech 130-131:135–14410.1016/S0924-0136(02)00729-X ↗
90. Eyckens P, Van Bael A, Van Houtte P (2008) An extended Marciniak-Kuczynski forming limit model to assess the influence of Through-Thickness Shear on formability. In: Hora P (ed) Proc. of the NUMISHEET 2008 Conf. Interlaken, Switzerland, pp 193–198
91. Eyckens P, Van Bael A, Van Houtte P (2009) Marciniak-Kuczynski type modelling of the effect of Through-Thickness Shear on the forming limits of sheet metal. Int J Plast 25, (in press)10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.02.002 ↗
92. Feldmann P, Schatz M (2006) Effective evaluation of FLC-tests with the optical in-process strain analysis system AUTOGRID. In: Hora P (ed) Numerical and experimental methods in prediction of forming limits in sheet forming and tube hydroforming processes. ETH Zürich, Zürich, pp 69–73
93. Feldmann P (2007) Application of starin analysis system AUTOGRID for evaluation of formability tests and for strain analysis on deformed parts. In: Tisza M (ed) Proc. of the IDDRG 2007 Conference, Gyor, 483–490
94. Ferron G, Makinde AJ (1988) Design and development of a biaxial strength testing device. J Test Eval 16:253–25610.1520/JTE10375J ↗
95. Fjeldbo SK, et al. (2005) A numerical study on the onset of plastic instability in extruded materials with strong through-thickness texture variation. In: Banabic D (ed) Proc. 8th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Cluj-Napoca April 2005. The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 209–213
96. Foecke T, Iadicola MA, Lin A, Banovic SW (2007) A method for direct measurement of multiaxial stress-strain curves in sheet metal. Metal Mater Trans A 38A:306–31310.1007/s11661-006-9044-y ↗
97. Fortunier R (1989) Dual potentials and extremum work principles in single crystal plasticity. J Mech Phys Solid 37:779–79010.1016/0022-5096(89)90019-7 ↗
98. Friebe H et al (2006) FLC determination and forming analysis by optical measurement system. In: Hora P (ed) Numerical and experimental methods in prediction of forming limits in sheet forming and tube hydroforming processes. ETH Zürich, Zürich, pp 74–81
99. Fyllingen O et al (2009) Estimation of forming limit diagrams by the use of the finite element method and Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Struct 87:128–13910.1016/j.compstruc.2008.07.002 ↗
100. Ganjiani M, Assempour A (2007) An improved analytical approach for determination of FLD considering the effects of yield functions. J Mater Process Tech 182:598–60710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.025 ↗