Crack propagation analysis using a hybrid 2D finite element–peridynamics framework with a residual-based quasi-static solver
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a hybrid finite element–peridynamics (FE–PD) framework for two-dimensional fracture simulation. The framework embeds a peridynamic fracture zone within surrounding finite element domains through a modified volume-based (VL) coupling scheme, enabling accurate representation of crack initiation and propagation while retaining the computational efficiency of finite element analysis in the elastic far field. A major contribution of this work is the development of a residual-based dynamic relaxation solver (RBDR) for quasi-static analyses of hybrid FE–PD coupled systems. Unlike adaptive dynamic relaxation (ADR) methods, which rely on artificial damping and fictitious mass to suppress oscillations, the proposed solver is entirely damping-free and achieves equilibrium by directly minimizing the residual force field through a Richardson-type pseudo-time iteration. The solver is matrix-free, reaches higher accuracy, and 23 times faster in wall-clock time than the standard Adaptive Dynamic Relaxation method. The framework is validated against the classical Kirsch stress concentration problem, where the ABAQUS FE model recovers the analytical SCF of 3.0 and the hybrid FE–PD model reproduces the correct quantitative distribution, except at the hole surface. The hybrid method with both RBDR and ADR is then applied to crack propagation problems under Mode I tensile loading, reproducing the crack morphology and global kinetic energy evolution of a reference PD-only model with high accuracy. For the crack propagation case under quasi-static loading at four times the dynamic load level solved through the hybrid method with RBDR, crack branching does not occur, consistent with classical fracture mechanics theory that inertia is the driven factor for dynamic instability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E (2009) “Damage prediction for electronic package drop test using finite element method and peridynamic theory.” In: 2009 59th Electron. Compon. Technol. Conf., 565–569. San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE.10.1109/ECTC.2009.5074069 ↗
2. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. 3rd edn. Boca Raton (Fla.): Taylor & Francis.
3. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–12910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
4. Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 45(5):601–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5%3c601::AID-NME598%3e3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
5. Bobaru F, Zhang G (2015) Why do cracks branch? A peridynamic investigation of dynamic brittle fracture. Int J Fract 196(1–2):59–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0056-810.1007/s10704-015-0056-8 ↗
6. Cox JV (2009) An extended finite element method with analytical enrichment for cohesive crack modeling. Int J Numer Meth Eng 78(1):48–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.247510.1002/nme.2475 ↗
7. De Borst R (1997) Some recent developments in computational modelling of concrete fracture. Int J Fract 86(1–2):5–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100736052146510.1023/A:1007360521465 ↗
8. Den Hartog JP (1987) Advanced strength of materials. Dover books on engineering. Dover Publications, New York
9. Di Prisco M, Ferrara L, Meftah F, Pamin J, De Borst R, Mazars J, Reynouard JM (2000) Mixed mode fracture in plain and reinforced concrete: some results on benchmark tests. Int J Fract 103(2):127–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100761300140210.1023/A:1007613001402 ↗
10. Galvanetto U, Mudric T, Shojaei A, Zaccariotto M (2016) An effective way to couple FEM meshes and Peridynamics grids for the solution of static equilibrium problems. Mech Res Commun 76:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.06.00610.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.06.006 ↗
11. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2006) 3D Crack propagation in unreinforced concrete. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(37–40):5198–5219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.10.02310.1016/j.cma.2005.10.023 ↗
12. Hong J-W, Bathe K-J (2005) Coupling and enrichment schemes for finite element and finite sphere discretizations. Comput Struct 83(17–18):1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.12.00210.1016/j.compstruc.2004.12.002 ↗
13. Irwin GR (1968) Linear fracture mechanics, fracture transition, and fracture control. Eng Fract Mech 1(2):241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(68)90001-510.1016/0013-7944(68)90001-5 ↗
14. Irwin G, De Wit R (1983) A Summary of Fracture Mechanics Concepts. J Test Eval 11(1):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE11586J10.1520/JTE11586J ↗
15. Jafarzadeh S, Mousavi F, Larios A, Bobaru F (2022) A general and fast convolution-based method for peridynamics: Applications to elasticity and brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 392:114666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11466610.1016/j.cma.2022.114666 ↗
16. Jafarzadeh S, Mousavi F, Wang L, Bobaru F (2024) PeriFast/Dynamics: A MATLAB Code for Explicit Fast Convolution-based Peridynamic Analysis of Deformation and Fracture. Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling 6(1):33–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-023-00097-610.1007/s42102-023-00097-6 ↗
17. Kilic B, Madenci E (2010a) An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 53(3):194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2010.08.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2010.08.001 ↗
18. Kilic B, Madenci E (2010b) Coupling of peridynamic theory and the finite element method. J Mech Mater Struct 5(5):707–733. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2010.5.70710.2140/jomms.2010.5.707 ↗
19. Lall P, Shantaram S, Panchagade D (2010) Peridynamic-models using finite elements for shock and vibration reliability of leadfree electronics. In: 2010 12th IEEE Intersoc. Conf. Therm. Thermomechanical Phenom. Electron. Syst., 1–12. Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE.10.1109/ITHERM.2010.5501274 ↗
20. Lehoucq R, Silling S (2008) Force flux and the peridynamic stress tensor. J Mech Phys Solids 56(4):1566–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2007.08.00410.1016/j.jmps.2007.08.004 ↗
21. Li J, Li S, Lai X, Liu L (2022) Peridynamic stress is the static first Piola-Kirchhoff Virial stress. Int J Solids Struct 241:111478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11147810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111478 ↗
22. Liu GR, Gu YT (2000) Coupling of element free Galerkin and hybrid boundary element methods using modified variational formulation. Comput Mech 26(2):166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466000016410.1007/s004660000164 ↗
23. Liu W, Hong J (2012a) Discretized peridynamics for brittle and ductile solids. Int J Numer Meth Eng 89(8):1028–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.327810.1002/nme.3278 ↗
24. Liu W, Hong J-W (2012b) A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 245–246:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.07.00610.1016/j.cma.2012.07.006 ↗
25. Lubineau G, Azdoud Y, Han F, Rey C, Askari A (2012) A morphing strategy to couple non-local to local continuum mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 60(6):1088–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2012.02.00910.1016/j.jmps.2012.02.009 ↗
26. Macek RW, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal des 43(15):1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2007.08.01210.1016/j.finel.2007.08.012 ↗
27. Melenk JM, Babuška I (1996) The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139(1–4):289–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-010.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-0 ↗
28. Meschke G, Dumstorff P (2007) Energy-based modeling of cohesive and cohesionless cracks via X-FEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(21–24):2338–2357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.11.01610.1016/j.cma.2006.11.016 ↗
29. Moes N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 46(1):131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1%3c131::AID-NME726%3e3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
30. Ni T, Zhang J, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U, Schrefler BA (2024) Matrix-based implementation and GPU acceleration of hybrid FEM and peridynamic model for hydro-mechanical coupled problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 125(18):e7504. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.750410.1002/nme.7504 ↗
31. Nooru-Mohamed MB, Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM (1993) Experimental and numerical study on the behavior of concrete subjected to biaxial tension and shear. Adv Cem Based Mater 1(1):22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/1065-7355(93)90005-910.1016/1065-7355(93)90005-9 ↗
32. Ongaro G, Seleson P, Galvanetto U, Ni T, Zaccariotto M (2021) Overall equilibrium in the coupling of peridynamics and classical continuum mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 381:113515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11351510.1016/j.cma.2020.113515 ↗
33. Patzák B, Jirásek M (2004) Adaptive Resolution of Localized Damage in Quasi-brittle Materials. J Eng Mech 130(6):720–732. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(720)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(720) ↗
34. Pernatii A, Gabbert U, Naumenko K, Hesse J-T, Willberg C (2023) A Penalty Method for Coupling of Finite-Element and Peridynamic Models. PAMM 22(1):e202200151. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.20220015110.1002/pamm.202200151 ↗
35. Pivonka P, Ožbolt J, Lackner R, Mang HA (2004) Comparative studies of 3D-constitutive models for concrete: application to mixed-mode fracture. Int J Numer Meth Eng 60(2):549–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.97510.1002/nme.975 ↗
36. Réthoré J, Roux S, Hild F (2010) Mixed-mode crack propagation using a Hybrid Analytical and eXtended Finite Element Method. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 338(3):121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2010.03.00110.1016/j.crme.2010.03.001 ↗
37. Ruiz G, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2001) Three-dimensional cohesive modeling of dynamic mixed-mode fracture. Int J Numer Meth Eng 52(1–2):97–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.27310.1002/nme.273 ↗
38. Seleson P, Pasetto M, John Y, Trageser J, Reeve ST (2024) PDMATLAB2D: A Peridynamics MATLAB Two-dimensional Code. Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling 6(1):149–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-023-00104-w10.1007/s42102-023-00104-w ↗
39. Shojaei A, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U (2017) Coupling of 2D discretized Peridynamics with a meshless method based on classical elasticity using switching of nodal behaviour. Eng Comput 34(5):1334–1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-03-2016-007810.1108/EC-03-2016-0078 ↗
40. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
41. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83(17–18):1526–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.02610.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
42. Silling SA, Lehoucq RB (2008) Convergence of Peridynamics to Classical Elasticity Theory. J Elast 93(1):13–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-008-9163-310.1007/s10659-008-9163-3 ↗
43. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic States and Constitutive Modeling. J Elast 88(2):151–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9125-110.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
44. Silling SA (2003) Dynamic fracture modeling with a meshfree peridynamic code. Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, pp 641–644. Elsevier.10.1016/B978-008044046-0.50157-3 ↗
45. Unger JF, Eckardt S, Könke C (2007) Modelling of cohesive crack growth in concrete structures with the extended finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(41–44):4087–4100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.02310.1016/j.cma.2007.03.023 ↗
46. Weckner O, Abeyaratne R (2005) The effect of long-range forces on the dynamics of a bar. J Mech Phys Solids 53(3):705–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2004.08.00610.1016/j.jmps.2004.08.006 ↗
47. Zaccariotto M, Luongo F, Sarego G, Galvanetto U (2015) Examples of applications of the peridynamic theory to the solution of static equilibrium problems. The Aeronautical Journal 119(1216):677–700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000192400001077010.1017/S0001924000010770 ↗
48. Zaccariotto M, Tomasi D, Galvanetto U (2017) An enhanced coupling of PD grids to FE meshes. Mech Res Commun 84:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.06.01410.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.06.014 ↗
49. Zaccariotto M, Mudric T, Tomasi D, Shojaei A, Galvanetto U (2018) Coupling of FEM meshes with Peridynamic grids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:471–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.01110.1016/j.cma.2017.11.011 ↗